of     2   

#209338245Thursday, February 09, 2017 6:05 AM GMT

Yes, I know. This has been suggested before, but who cares? I would like to see it regardless of whether someone has already wanted it or not. Also, sorry to say it, but this is LONG. Expect to read for a few minutes at the most. ROBLOX wants us to give lots of explanation and details, so I gave them that here. Everyone here may not have had the best experience about most of the updates that came out on ROBLOX. But... What if we, as the community, could vote? What if ROBLOX came up with two or so updates that would improve the game, site, or both, and then allowed us to vote on which one we think is the best? How this would work is we would be able to either go to a different section of our site, or we would go somewhere on the ROBLOX blog, and ROBLOX would come up with some ideas for updates (And yes, they could throw in some of the best ideas from S&I in there as well, so don't worry about S&I becoming COMPLETELY irrelevant). These ideas would then be put in this "Voting" section, and, you guessed it, we would be able to choose what idea we feel is the best one. We would have... Say... At least a month, if not more time, for voting (Most likely, they would determine this time, not me, lol). And once again, you guessed it, the idea/updates with the most votes would be the next update that gets added to ROBLOX. Yes, it would take longer to add new updates, but in the long run, it would make users feel better about the ROBLOX updates by giving them a choice. You've probably thought "If we add this, EVERYONE would say "No" to EVERY update, and ROBLOX wouldn't go ANYWHERE, because the community won't want to go anywhere," right? Well, this will come as a surprise to some of you... But there would not be a "No" option to this voting system. Yes. You read that correctly. If we had a "No" option, we wouldn't be able to update the game much. Most likely, LOTS of users would choose this "No" option if we had it, because they either don't trust ROBLOX from previous mistakes, or they just don't want ROBLOX to try to branch out and improve. Our only choice would be to choose the idea we think is the best. There wouldn't be a "No" option. Also, you've probably thought "Well, people could use bots for unfair votes," right? Well, a CAPTCHA (Though it won't get rid of EVERY SINGLE bot and alt) will help with this issue. Users would have to go through a CAPTCHA before they can click the vote button, to reduce unfair votes. Also, only accounts with emails can vote (I know, it sounds horrible, but trust me, it would reduce the amount of unfair votes), to make sure that most ACTUAL accounts are voting, and not some alt made in seconds. There aren't many other solutions to unfair voting, since it would be difficult to keep alt accounts out, but other than that, only allowing users with emails to vote and a CAPTCHA should work fairly well (And maybe the CAPTCHA would slow down the people using alts, since they would have to fill it out EVERY SINGLE TIME they vote). We can't entirely get rid of alts and bots, but we can at least reduce the amount, which in turn will allow votes to be more fair. Lastly (This sort of goes with the second paragraph), you've probably thought "Well, can we trust ROBLOX to come up with good updates/ideas after some of their past mistakes? Would they come up with bad ones?" Well, I am sorry to say... But yes, it's possible for ROBLOX to think of bad ideas/updates. They aren't going to come up with the best ideas EVERY time. Which is exactly why they should come up with multiple ideas (And include a couple from S&I), to raise their chances of coming up with something that the community AND ROBLOX can benefit from. That is also exactly why we should be able to vote for ideas that we think are good, to simultaneously improve ROBLOX while also making the community feel like they matter here. Trust me, if ROBLOX allowed the community to engage in some of the new updates, the new updates would feel much better to the community, and it would probably allow us to set ROBLOX on a path that benefits both sides without praying for the one-in-a-million chance that a moderator will even see the ideas, let alone consider them. Yes, I know, there are still issues with this idea, even if you consider some of the solutions I have came up with (Such as the aforementioned alts issue. People would probably still be able to make alts, but it would be slow, since you would have to make new emails, and go through a CAPTCHA just to unfairly vote). But if this idea gets added, both the community AND ROBLOX would be able to benefit, since ROBLOX would be more likely to add ideas that the community would enjoy by allowing the community to choose the one they feel is the best.
#209340105Thursday, February 09, 2017 7:16 AM GMT

#209340811Thursday, February 09, 2017 7:53 AM GMT

I posted this before, but I lost it, so support, this one is more well written
#209341155Thursday, February 09, 2017 8:21 AM GMT

#209341168Thursday, February 09, 2017 8:22 AM GMT

TL;DR: Make a voting system for updates, Add captcha to prevent unfair votes. Support.
#209342409Thursday, February 09, 2017 9:44 AM GMT

#209343758Thursday, February 09, 2017 11:49 AM GMT

This would be a terrible voting system No support It's a goggle!
#209344058Thursday, February 09, 2017 12:12 PM GMT

This idea is great. To prevent alts almost entirely, a player voting would have to have played ROBLOX for at least a year. Other than that, support. OOF!
#209344119Thursday, February 09, 2017 12:15 PM GMT

No. Then they would say "yes" or "no" in the poll by using bots and alts, then that could be a problem if it stays there. Not happening. sincerely, roblox soldier (RAP: 7)
#209349744Thursday, February 09, 2017 3:56 PM GMT

@therobloxsoldier Obviously, you didn't read the whole thing, because you would have saw the parts where I said that there wouldn't be a "No" option, there would be a CAPTCHA, and only accounts with emails could vote.
#209349812Thursday, February 09, 2017 3:58 PM GMT

@stinkey Would you care to explain why this would be bad? The only flaw I saw (And I mentioned it in the post) is that people would still make alts (Which would take a long time for them to make, considering the fact that they have to make new emails as well as new accounts).
#209349896Thursday, February 09, 2017 4:00 PM GMT

"𝓣𝓛;𝓓𝓡" ...It's supposed to be long, dude. ROBLOX won't add it if I don't explain as much as I can. Also, if you really think about how much time it takes to read it, it would only take you a few minutes at the most. That's not really long.
#209350001Thursday, February 09, 2017 4:03 PM GMT

@slvd Thanks for making a shorter version for people who don't like reading essays, lol. @Everyone who supported Thanks, guys. I really hope this idea gets added.
#209350317Thursday, February 09, 2017 4:12 PM GMT

This would just end up with nothing changing, as many people would constantly vote against changes.
#209350372Thursday, February 09, 2017 4:14 PM GMT

This is the must happen update cause it was proven working on other games SUPPORT
#209350494Thursday, February 09, 2017 4:17 PM GMT

@Sir Like I said to therobloxsoldier, there wouldn't be a "No" option. Users would HAVE to choose which update/idea they feel is the best.
#209354111Thursday, February 09, 2017 5:51 PM GMT

@awesome this idea was proven working BUT, ONLY BC OR 1-2 YEAR OLD VETERANS SHOULD BE ABLE TO VOTE TO PREVENT ALTS
#209399134Friday, February 10, 2017 5:34 AM GMT

@fig That sounds like a nice way to deal with the alts. That could be a system they add along with this idea.
#209399893Friday, February 10, 2017 5:50 AM GMT

@figva, that's still not good enough. i may as well just use dozens of veteran accounts and bc alts to participate in polls if they ever become a thing!
#209400395Friday, February 10, 2017 5:59 AM GMT

@Time Yeah... But it would still reduce the amount of NEW alts being able to unfairly tip the votes over. Trust me, not a lot of people have a bunch of veteran accounts laying around (And even if they do, the owner might have just forgotten the information needed to use them, since they probably didn't even have much use for a few old alts, unless they existed during the time of Tix abuse).
#209407629Friday, February 10, 2017 10:12 AM GMT

"@therobloxsoldier Obviously, you didn't read the whole thing, because you would have saw the parts where I said that there wouldn't be a "No" option, there would be a CAPTCHA, and only accounts with emails could vote." Dude, they will bypass CAPTCHA. But there are so so many abusers that want something back. Even though they will still bot the posts, then it is already the problem. Accounts with emails will still bot the system with bots and alts to vote for the next update. Everyday, every single day, there are almost no updates coming to roblox. But I read and I do not support your idea. Please be guided accordingly. sincerely, roblox soldier (RAP: 7)
#209407830Friday, February 10, 2017 10:23 AM GMT

ROBLOX Is a large company, and it haves many exploiters in it ALOT. They probably have bots so they can cancel the update whenever they want or not. ROBLOX doesn't care about community.
#209410023Friday, February 10, 2017 12:00 PM GMT

If they have a voting event you should get a message from roblox [Insert Signature]
#209410205Friday, February 10, 2017 12:10 PM GMT

##### make it so the vote system only accepts one input per computer.
#209410327Friday, February 10, 2017 12:16 PM GMT

No support for the following reasons: As of the time people voted, the update may seem terrible, then end up being a really good update like the Price floor, which now allows for clothing businesses to succeed. Some updates aren't meant for the Majority of the community, they are meant for Developers tons of the time. TONS of people are completely uninformed on how ROBLOX works. So when we get the chance for an AWESOME update like new dynamic lighting, the little kids don't at all understand what that is so they may just vote no because why not?

    of     2