jmk2004
#212795851Saturday, March 25, 2017 11:29 PM GMT

And also, if you need Roblox to manage your child's screen time, put your child up for adoption, as you are not fit to be a parent with that sort of laziness. You need to manage your child's screen time your own. This post is likely just another soccer parent baiting for attention.
smashbros122
#212796148Saturday, March 25, 2017 11:34 PM GMT

I see your suggestion on health, so I'll give you that its better in activity. But come on, $50 for 4 hours in one day? That costs as much as a game. Also, games really shouldn't judge people on health loss. In fact, I'm gonna get all soccer moms to burn down ROBLOX HQ if this becomes a thing, stomp on the ashes, use a pitchfork on any of the survivors, and then dance in victory.
HttpFaithful
#212797881Sunday, March 26, 2017 12:03 AM GMT

People would literally play another game instead then. It should be the parents job to monitor their child's screen time, not ROBLOX's. I also feel like if they do come out with this feature people are going to be like "OH ROBLOX JUST WANTS EXTRA MONEY WOW ROBLOX POWERING OUR MONEY AMIRITE", so yeah...
RobloxCongressman
#212799580Sunday, March 26, 2017 12:29 AM GMT

How would you guys know ANY of these outcomes you proposed? Just give it a chance!
InterstellarSailor
#212799756Sunday, March 26, 2017 12:32 AM GMT

There goes internet neutrality.. Even though you are pointing out an epidemic of being addicted to the internet and ruining our eyes... That would just make roblox lose a lot of money and basically fail. Not the mention it will probably put Roblox on the news and probably not for a good thing...
RobloxCongressman
#212800383Sunday, March 26, 2017 12:41 AM GMT

"Roblox on the news and probably not for a good thing..." News Reporter: This just in! A kids mass multiplayer online site, ROBLOX, is working on fighting internet ######### among our younger community, they are making a good example on how important it is to get some good exercise! Ohh... the humanity (sarcasm)
Blueyii
#212801129Sunday, March 26, 2017 12:52 AM GMT

If you add amount of time for play time. Roblox can lose money because whats the point if you can't play Roblox for more then just a couple hours. then pay half of a ####### to a ####### dollars? that's a real high price and no one will pay for it. Witch makes Roblox lose money. I'm glad that you are concern about the amount of time kids go outside. also you didn't think about the weather. If its raining outside or to hot, cold, snowing, etc. It's a great idea to help kids to get outside more. Maybe come up with an idea that won't do bad on Roblox part? Just saying.
Blueyii
#212801227Sunday, March 26, 2017 12:53 AM GMT

I cant say ### ####### great.
LLGlo
#212802267Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:08 AM GMT

I understand where you are coming from but what about the people who don't care about exercise, or maybe the people who don't #### ## # ##### where they can really go outside safely. This might not matter though because almost anybody that has a computer can go outside. Also those people who physically can't. There was one guy who I didn't really know until I heard the news. He had some disability and sadly passed. I agree a lot with your reasons but I am speaking for the people who can't. Keep in mind I am speaking of a very small minority. Over 99% of "robloxians" can go outside. (This is a guess) I believe that in theory it sounds good but in practice it might not. G'day.
DR2D2
#212802380Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:10 AM GMT

┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐ thats bull #### and ## hippie ## bucks heck rather buy grand theft auto than extra time
DR2D2
#212802411Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:10 AM GMT

####
PhilCoke
#212802889Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:17 AM GMT

0/10 troll "I would never lie. I willfully participated in a campaign of misinformation." -- Fox Mulder
ui4c2004
#212802998Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:18 AM GMT

1. The parents should be able to set time. 2. If the time exceeds, it will do that to any account on the computer.
LOVEMEH133
#212803850Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:32 AM GMT

If this idea gets approved then Roblox may lose money because less people are playing because the time-limit because they don't want to pay. Also the weather is a real thing, what if it rains, its very cold or hot and other weather may happen and is forced to say inside what if they use all there time up and is not allowed to play anything else. the Short End sorry your idea is crushed maybe remember logic next time and the weather
RobloxCongressman
#212804195Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:37 AM GMT

"but what about the people who don't care about exercise" Well they should care.
LLGlo
#212804901Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:48 AM GMT

The only problem is you will not believe the number of the people who could care less about going outside and their parents also could care less.
pullman45
#212813067Sunday, March 26, 2017 3:34 AM GMT

Congressman is a legendary fisherman.
nicsena
#212818623Sunday, March 26, 2017 4:57 AM GMT

No Support! I think ROBLOX would give us Additional 12 hours for $5.95 (As cheap as Builders Club!) - Is anyone gonna support this! Additional 12 Hours for $5.95 2 Hours for $50 - No Support
theUTMdiamond
#212818653Sunday, March 26, 2017 4:57 AM GMT

Yes, I saw him making a tix post and: 1. He is a fisherman so he pretended to be a paranoid kid who thinks he always get supported. EXAMPLE: Someone: No support. Him: Thanks for your support(!!!). 2. He was actually a paranoid kid who thinks he always get supported. Then he was cured. Diamond Bloxxer.
McBlocko
#212818796Sunday, March 26, 2017 4:59 AM GMT

#### thanks for the information.
Eriksonchik
#212830915Sunday, March 26, 2017 8:56 AM GMT

No Support (Why?) Because If They Time Limit Ends They Can Play Minecraft Or Other Games
GoldenWolfDylan693
#212831825Sunday, March 26, 2017 9:19 AM GMT

How about you stop thinking that ROBLOX will just add what you want, and when someone disagrees you blame them for "not reading the comments", I disagree strongly with your idea and I have read the comments so don't bother getting any ideas of asking me to "read the comments".
Tacezz
#212832166Sunday, March 26, 2017 9:26 AM GMT

1st of all, screens will not do any dmg to ur eyes. 2nd of all, this is the worst idea for a feature.
MightyDantheman
#212832410Sunday, March 26, 2017 9:31 AM GMT

Tacezz, screens do actually damage your eyes. To be more exact, certain levels of blue light. Although this is an extremely slow process, your eyesight will be worse than someone who doesn't commonly use a computer at the age of 60 or so. But it's generally not something you need to worry about. Besides, you can correct your eyesight nowadays. As far as this thread goes, please stop baiting people. This is clearly a terrible idea in a ridiculous amount of ways. ~MightyDantheman~
Sceptihawk
#212835535Sunday, March 26, 2017 10:56 AM GMT

I'm late to this, so I'm only responding to the thread. It's people's choice to go outside or not. Why are you trying to control what people do? "If life knocks you unconscious, you're going to the hospital" - Sceptihawk