xjake99Join Date: 2010-10-09
Post Count: 6881 |
Boston should trade their #1 pick for PG13
makes perfect sense because Pacers need a PG and can get Fultz and celtics can beat cavs now |
|
|
WaxNewtonJoin Date: 2010-03-17
Post Count: 9209 |
yeah trade ur #1 overall which will develop a strong player for a pg13 thats past his prime... not to mention he has 2 years left on his contract...
good idea.. |
|
|
PG13 is nowhere near past his prime lmao |
|
|
The fact they are in win now mode, they don't need their draft pick unless they really don't care about a championship |
|
WaxNewtonJoin Date: 2010-03-17
Post Count: 9209 |
well boston is winning now, so trading for pg13 will just damage the chemistry and waste a potential franchise player |
|
|
they should definitely trade their #1 pick
this draft is loaded with guards and they don't need another guard
|
|
WaxNewtonJoin Date: 2010-03-17
Post Count: 9209 |
they should trade it, but for a developing player that's still young. |
|
|
like whats wrong with lonzo ball
|
|
|
|
Celtics would be unstoppable by the time then |
|
|
"they should trade it, but for a developing player that's still young."
PG is 27, if anything he is just hitting his prime.
No where near past it... He averaged 24, 7 and 3 last season with almost 2 steals a game while shooting about 40% from 3...
If you think PG is past his prime in anyway you dont know NBA basketball and shouldnt post anything about it again |
|
123yonndTop 100 PosterJoin Date: 2008-07-19
Post Count: 66637 |
I wouldn't trade for 1 year of PG13 when you can have a potential all-star in the making with most likely Fultz.
This Celtics team wasn't supposed to be this good this soon. They were blessed to get an elite scorer in IT4, and he is the perfect man to pass the torch being that they are both went to uni in Seattle for UofW. |
|
xjake99Join Date: 2010-10-09
Post Count: 6881 |
dont see how this is a bad trade considering that can win now with this trade |
|
|
Well since they are good now, it's a good idea to trade the pick |
|
|
rather get fultz or lonzo to play guard for celtics and have more firepower
sure PG-13 is alright, but if we get a younger, more flexible player, that we can lead and turn into a beast, i rather go with that plan
|
|
|
Why would you rather wait longer to win a championship then trade for a star to win next season? |
|
xjake99Join Date: 2010-10-09
Post Count: 6881 |
lol thats a risk thinking Fultz will be better then an all star in PG13
not saying he wont but ur getting a guaranteed Superstar entering his prime |
|
|
From my knowledge if im correct, the Celtics need someone who can rebound, and score inside. From the few times ive watched them and talked to Celtics fans, we both agree that they shoot too many 3s...in my way of thinking about it you can play Horford at C and George at PF...but hey another short SG will suit BOS well! |
|
|
And forgot to add about Lonzo: He isnt going to go to Boston, why would Boston even attempt to take someone who is not going to play for them |
|
|
we need rebounding and forwards not ####### GUARDS |
|
|
|
also another reason i'd rather have butter, he's under contract until 2019 and potentially 2020 if he accepts his player option |
|
xjake99Join Date: 2010-10-09
Post Count: 6881 |
since when is PG13 a guard |
|
|
he played shooting guard, small forward, and power forward
|
|