of     2   

#87379283Sunday, January 20, 2013 1:27 PM GMT

They're so pointless - and annoying! And a waste of time! What is the point in them?
#87379414Sunday, January 20, 2013 1:30 PM GMT

nop no way. ~PX3
#87379935Sunday, January 20, 2013 1:44 PM GMT

it should be added :P ~如果你的主意是可行的,我會給予支持。~ ^ My signature :P
#87389897Sunday, January 20, 2013 4:40 PM GMT

No. People can type signitures if they want. ~[ Content NOT Deleted ] ~
#87389968Sunday, January 20, 2013 4:41 PM GMT

To show creativity. And title fix ~Logic makes sense~
#87408033Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:24 PM GMT

no support players like to make them READ THE WNTS BEFORE POSTING
#87408162Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:25 PM GMT

Signatures don't even exist. They're user typed.
#87408382Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:28 PM GMT

Not in a life time. ~Pretty Committee Leader
#87408483Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:29 PM GMT

no. ~Just me, and my beans~
#87408587Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:30 PM GMT

Nada. ~All toasters toast toast~
#87408703Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:32 PM GMT

~Grammar comes from hatred, no one has discovered it's beauty~
#87408704Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:32 PM GMT

#87408897Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:34 PM GMT

NO! ~༄ When Knife makes orange juice, from one or more oranges, DRINK IT!༄~
#87409652Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:43 PM GMT

Lol almost everyone here has a siggy. ~If zombies chase us, I'm tripping you!~
#87409806Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:45 PM GMT

well, i believe people above said what i needed to say "The candles are lit, the end is near!"
#87410407Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:52 PM GMT

There is a reason that signatures aren't officially implemented, they're annoying.
#87410647Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:54 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
#87411161Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:00 PM GMT

I love signatures. I never really use mine but... ~I have a fish. You wish you had a fish.~
#87411715Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:07 PM GMT

1. No, it is never going to happen. 2. People like them. 3. They show creativity. 4. They are typed by the user so you can't get rid of it. 5. They are fun to think of even though I don't have one. 6. Oh I wanted 6 ...... Oh wait here is one get out.
#87412726Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:20 PM GMT

"Show creativity", you guys sound like hipsters.
#87413241Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:26 PM GMT

I am. I think. ~If zombies chase us, I'm tripping you!~
#87413448Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:28 PM GMT

No! I like my siggy! ~When Life Gives You Lemons, Squirt Them Into Your Eyes And Call Yourself A Man~
#87413526Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:29 PM GMT

Nope. No reason to do this. "Annoying" is an opinion. Somtimes I use mine somtimes I dont. "Flying, explosive heads," he muttered almost to himself, "Those rangers really are pecular"
#87413725Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:30 PM GMT

I still don't support this.
#87416130Sunday, January 20, 2013 10:00 PM GMT

I do not support this. I will give the reason. The signatures players make in they're posts are User-Typed, rather then a type of ROBLOX-made Signature bot to display a signature under each of your posts. To prevent spam, the mods already added a rule so sigs cannot be more then one line long, according to a pinned thread on the "Off Topic" forum. Yes, they could make this against the rules. But heres a reason why its pointless to make it against the rules: Signatures in no way cause any harm to the ROBLOX Community. Players would break the rule anyway, but this reason isn't exactly a good one for why its pointless. Signatures are just for players to have fun expressing themselves in each post they make. For example, lets use... watevs44's signature. His is something like The Dream Crusher or something, I haven't seen him post in a while. He uses that one, from my guess, is because when he does not support he always gives a good reason to not support it, therefore assisting his post. It should not be against the rules just because of some players not liking signatures or thinking "they're for nubs." If you do not like signatures, simply do not view peoples signatures, and do not make your own signature. Easy as that.

    of     2