Lilly_SForum ModeratorJoin Date: 2010-11-21
Post Count: 8363 |
We're changing up how we win wars now. No more of these raid-nullifying final battles.
It's a very simple system for anyone who knows basic addition and division or can operate a calculator.
Wars will last (default) 4 weeks.
Raid wins will be counted up each week.
At the end of the week, raid wins will be divided by 7.
At the end of the war, all of the weeks will be added up and averaged (divided by the amount of weeks.)
Example:
Week 1: 14 wins
Week 2: 7 wins
Week 3: 21 wins
Week 4: 7 wins
14/7 = 2
7/7 = 1
21/7 = 3
7/7 = 1
=7
7/4 = 1.75 win rate
The team who has the better rate at the end of the war will win the war.
Wars can be longer than 4 weeks if necessary, but 4 is the default. |
|
amoebaJoin Date: 2009-01-04
Post Count: 2709 |
Approved |
|
|
Legion1xJoin Date: 2012-04-22
Post Count: 4326 |
wtf |
|
|
Lilly_SForum ModeratorJoin Date: 2010-11-21
Post Count: 8363 |
this is basic math, sorry if its above your level of comprehension as it wasn't meant to be confusing. |
|
|
this is really dumb and over-complicated lol |
|
|
Lilly_SForum ModeratorJoin Date: 2010-11-21
Post Count: 8363 |
its not that complicated. |
|
davidsameJoin Date: 2012-09-16
Post Count: 977 |
That's...interesting. |
|
|
Hmm.
[:/Sirian Empire: Lieutenant Williams Sentinel\:] |
|
|
i'm not saying i don't understand it it's just that i think you're over-complicating the whole concept of war on this game |
|
Lilly_SForum ModeratorJoin Date: 2010-11-21
Post Count: 8363 |
it's not complicated at all though
maybe you should read it, or learn 5th grade math |
|
|
what if it is even when the war ends? Is there a final battle then, or continue the war. Or should there be a small margin to draw? |
|
|
UtsuroidoJoin Date: 2008-09-26
Post Count: 18402 |
I agree with LV, it's over complicating the whole concept of war on the game.. |
|
SlaychapJoin Date: 2013-04-13
Post Count: 2094 |
It's not complicated; but it's stupid.
One day of like 4 raid wins, could make a large difference on the war... |
|
AetheaJoin Date: 2008-12-12
Post Count: 9836 |
Yeah cause who ever has the most wins is insufficient. |
|
Theta0Join Date: 2011-02-09
Post Count: 40750 |
what is the point of this |
|
zman250Join Date: 2011-01-20
Post Count: 18410 |
Sounds cool, I like it. |
|
Lilly_SForum ModeratorJoin Date: 2010-11-21
Post Count: 8363 |
What's stupid is final battles.
Group A wins 30 raids in one week, Group B wins 5, they have a final battle and Group B wins.
^ That's stupid. |
|
|
Lilly
Own VS already
[Sloppeh] |
|
VictorlyJoin Date: 2013-05-05
Post Count: 6450 |
u use VS's money for ur own cause
|
|
SlaychapJoin Date: 2013-04-13
Post Count: 2094 |
@imnot,
they'd never have a final battle if that was the case, final battles are used when Group A has 20 wins, and Group B has 18, for example. But yea, I kind of agree, final battles are useless, people can just get people from their clan, who has been inactive during the war to come and fight, it's just who has the best 8-9 combatants in the group.
My suggestion for getting rid of final battles could be: You have the war go on for 1 more week, the group/clan who gets the most raid wins during that week, is considered the winner of the war. |
|
|
I thought she would forum something about the exploiters... |
|