of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

Shadowman104
#101047802Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:30 AM GMT

6/12/13 20:12 caleb10909 #RGRM Military Advisers caleb10909 changed the group status to: If anyone wishes to attend an offensive (Not representing RGRM) but if you want to help attack a failed copy verison of RGRM go here: http://www.roblox.com/RUC-Mygeeto-Outpost-place?id=68050223 ^ To start this off, Caleb10909 dislikes RUC, so he proposed an off duty raid. RGRM off-duty raided RUC, and won. We got into the RUC base more than twice, and passed through the raider bridge more than three times. Tony, angered about this, went to CV4 and exploited after threatening to set Coruscant on freemodels multiple times. Here is the direct quotes from him from the RGRM Wall: " tonymontananumber2 Caleb The video shows you guys never passed raider bridge on top of that In order for the Raid to EVEN count as stated in the Rules on descript SpectorEight MUST be present. 6/12/2013 8:59:42 PM" " tonymontananumber2 YOU WERE IN RGRM RAID UNIFORM THAT MEANS RGRM. 6/12/2013 8:58:41 PM " " tonymontananumber2 If you Raid RUC base once more you will regret it. We are STILL allies and if you wish not to lose your "Tech" to free models than I'd stop trying to bul [s] your way out of an obvious attack on an ally. 6/12/2013 8:57:48 PM" Now to combat all this, this was an off duty raid. Here is a direct quote from the shout; " If anyone wishes to attend an offensive (Not representing RGRM) " We used the RGRM raiding uniform due to it, being raiding. But we stated on the shout this was an off duty raid, Caleb had stated this during a briefing at Coruscant
Eltork
#101047853Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:30 AM GMT

Hi Shadowman104
Shadowman104
#101047919Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:31 AM GMT

Hi Travis. Also I forgot to state, we beat RUC in the raid, Tony crashed us all during it
Shadowman104
#101048330Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:34 AM GMT

Gotta show this to everyone (Basically bump)
Shadowman104
#101049556Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:43 AM GMT

Adventureee~
ITheNightI
#101052526Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:08 AM GMT

lol
Motivational
#101052582Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:09 AM GMT

hi
ImperatorChaos
#101052585Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:09 AM GMT

Shy
Dravum
#101052784Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:11 AM GMT

Just saying it doesn't represent you, while also noticing that this causes distrust is a nono. No matter what you say, it represented RGRM. lol
Shadowman104
#101052926Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:12 AM GMT

@aso, The fact we stated multiple times "WE WERE NOT REPRESENTING RGRM" means WE ARE NOT REPRESENTING RGRM Its like saying to Einstein 2+2=5
Shadowman104
#101053161Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:14 AM GMT

Your continuation to exploit Coruscant just shows immaturity, Tony. You and all your little exploiter kiddy friends are immature.
Dravum
#101053187Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:14 AM GMT

What group was the main raiding party from? What uniform were they wearing? Who were the HRs commanding from? Oh right. RGRM. IT REPRESENTED YOU.
Shadowman104
#101053329Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:16 AM GMT

Whilst we stated we weren't representing them, we needed a uniform to present we were allies to each other. Would you rather us run around in random uniforms, not recognize each other and be gunned down/tk'ed? Its pathetic I even have to argue on this, we weren't representing RGRM Also in C&G terms, RUC "got rekt"
Shadowman104
#101053498Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:17 AM GMT

RIGHTEOUSKILLER1 Shoguncross Think your exploiter buddies can hide from us, Tony?
Dravum
#101053720Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:19 AM GMT

Just because you believe it for you, doesn't mean others will. The HRs were RGRM; The members were RGRM; The shout was in the RGRM group; The uniforms were RGRM; That's four reasons why you ARE representing RGRM.
Shadowman104
#101053831Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:20 AM GMT

>3 HRs, all off duty >All off duty members >Off duty raid >Off duty raid in the raiding uniform, thus off duty raid I don't think you grasp the concept of an off duty raid
Dravum
#101054020Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:22 AM GMT

I don't think you grasp the fine line of "off duty". >Means you don't have the powers you have in the group when on duty. It was shouted, organized, and populated by the group RGRM. >Therefore, represents RGRM. gg no re
Shadowman104
#101054120Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:23 AM GMT

Organized as off duty, members didn't have to come if they didn't want to, all of them WILLINGLY came
Shadowman104
#101055601Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:35 AM GMT

[NEWS] SpectorEight, leader of RUC, is now threatening to sell RGRM Tech. Immaturity such as this will not be tolerated towards RGRM, all RUC are temporarily KOS under 401st orders and HRs are now proposing war to the Senate against RUC.
Shadowman104
#101055683Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:36 AM GMT

In other words, get "rekt", RUC.
chanomano
#101056071Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:39 AM GMT

You were in uniform, which means you were representing the clan. You should've known better, and RUC are at no fault. -- [HVN] Commander Adam Mephisto Marksworth --
Shadowman104
#101056174Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:40 AM GMT

No fault threatening to hack our tech? Their immaturity shows, plus we explained enough we were off duty. We organized an off duty raid explaining men did not have to go if they did not wished, many went, and many won.
Dravum
#101056382Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:42 AM GMT

"did not have to go if they did not wished" You realize they don't have to go to any raids if they did not wish?
Shadowman104
#101056543Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:43 AM GMT

Indeed, but many still went, showing they WANTED to go
Dravum
#101056679Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:44 AM GMT

They come if they want to "on duty", and represent the clan. They come if they want to "off duty", and do not represent the clan. How do you define when you're off duty/on duty?

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right