of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

iswearonmemum
#105377216Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:16 AM GMT

>to be killed without punishment >forgetting that OJ simpson killed two white people
NoobEra3
#105377502Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:19 AM GMT

Trayvon Martin is actually covered in tattoos
iswearonmemum
#105377802Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:21 AM GMT

doesn't matter what type of person he is
WaxNewton
#105377851Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:22 AM GMT

Shut your mouth pls.
iswearonmemum
#105378276Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:26 AM GMT

never if people are going to accuse the justice system of hating blacks (black victims aren't served justice,blacks being accused of crimes are automatically guilty), they're forgetting the fact that an actual black murderer got off on his case
WaxNewton
#105378969Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:33 AM GMT

i dont get u r u on zimmermans side or the treyvon
iswearonmemum
#105379125Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:35 AM GMT

i'm on no side i think the law is screwy, but zimmerman is innocent. i really hate how the world is reacting to it. they think it's an issue of race
alejandroJUGO
#105379399Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:38 AM GMT

should be convicted of manslaughter. not murder
WaxNewton
#105379779Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:41 AM GMT

Ale , no he shouldn't been convicted of anything. Its self defense.
alejandroJUGO
#105379820Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:42 AM GMT

Self defense? He wasn't attacked. Manslaughter means he didn't mean to kill him.
iswearonmemum
#105380057Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:44 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
KRSOne
#105380303Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:47 AM GMT

You're really acting suspect now, because he shot him, and that still counts as manslaughter since he felt no desire to kill him, but still did.
alejandroJUGO
#105380349Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:47 AM GMT

It couldve been self inflicted, Plus Zimmerman possibly attacked him first. George changed his case, several times.
johnman124
#105380433Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:48 AM GMT

@iswear Who's to say Zimmerman didn't point the gun at Martin before he was "attacked" that would mean trayvon Martin attacked in self defense and was killed because of it.
KRSOne
#105380439Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:48 AM GMT

Adding to my last post, that counts as manslaughter, which he should be charged for.
iswearonmemum
#105381458Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:58 AM GMT

"since he felt no desire to kill him, but still did." 1. that's not what manslaughter is. manslaughter is an unjustified killing without intentions of malice. ex: killing a person while shooting your gun off in public 2. you might want to kill the person who is attacking you and bashing your head against a sidewalk. "It couldve been self inflicted," i highly doubt people bash their heads against a sidewalk with pure intention to do so. there's also forensic evidence that martin was on top of zimmerman "Plus Zimmerman possibly attacked him first." speculation, not fact "George changed his case, several times." there's evidence besides his story. in the heat of the moment, facts get muddled "Who's to say Zimmerman didn't point the gun at Martin before he was "attacked" that would mean trayvon Martin attacked in self defense and was killed because of it." if you attack a person with fists when they have a gun, you have poor instincts. and if your silly hypothesis is true, martin would be dead before he laid a hand on zimmerman
alejandroJUGO
#105381613Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:00 AM GMT

" that would mean trayvon Martin attacked in self defense and was killed because of it." Then this trial would be silenced. Why did Zimmerman have the gun in the first place?
iswearonmemum
#105381782Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:02 AM GMT

"Then this trial would be silenced." no, it would be a guilty verdict "Why did Zimmerman have the gun in the first place?" because he's american, and it's legal to own one?
johnman124
#105381794Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:02 AM GMT

If he had the gun before hand and Martin didn't know of it then Zimmerman probably would have had intentions to kill before the attac otherwise he wouldn't have had the gun
KariLehtonen
#105382146Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:05 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
KRSOne
#105382178Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:06 AM GMT

@Iswear, Explain to me what you would do if a complete stranger was following you and you knew he was armed, please.
iswearonmemum
#105383348Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:21 AM GMT

"If he had the gun before hand and Martin didn't know of it then Zimmerman probably would have had intentions to kill before the attac" many people carry a gun for many different reasons. not all people who have guns are murderers waiting for an opprotunity. "otherwise he wouldn't have had the gun" self defence? the fact that it's legal to own one? it's part of his job? "Explain to me what you would do if a complete stranger was following you and you knew he was armed, please." 1. false assumption that martin knew zimmerman was armed 2. a) walk away b) try not to provoke anything c) keep walking d) call the police if i feel threatened
johnman124
#105383508Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:23 AM GMT

We have neighborhood watchmen and they defientley don't carry guns even though they own guns. Neighborhood watchme are supposed to call the police if they feel a crime is going to happen if they see someone suspicious. Not take the law into their own hands.
iswearonmemum
#105383626Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:25 AM GMT

"We have neighborhood watchmen and they defientley don't carry guns even though they own guns." zimmerman lived in a neighbourhood with a lot of break ins, so it's justified to have him carry one "Neighborhood watchme are supposed to call the police if they feel a crime is going to happen if they see someone suspicious." which he did "Not take the law into their own hands." zimmerman exited his car to confront martin. martin started the confrontation, and then zimmerman shot him in self defence. that's not vigilantism
alejandroJUGO
#105383676Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:25 AM GMT

all you do is argue tato -_-

    of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right