|
Lots of players have ideas that is breaking the WNTS. We seriously want to stop telling them.
~GreatAdventures |
|
|
Jtmt88Join Date: 2008-06-07
Post Count: 4346 |
Agreed. Especially the font idea. |
|
XandalfJoin Date: 2011-07-18
Post Count: 4416 |
No support, they can just say they already read it. There is no exact way for them to be forced to read it. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
@Xandalf:
If it's someone's first time on S&I or if the WNTS is updated, they get redirected to the WNTS and can't advance to S&I for 30 seconds.
There you go.
Banning violators/CD'ing violations is another option.
@OP:
Support. |
|
XandalfJoin Date: 2011-07-18
Post Count: 4416 |
'There you go'. No, it they'd skip it too. Everyone would skip it. It'll be like that thing that was made like, a year ago saying 'Hey Builder! We've improved your toolbox.' That shows up every time you build. Still no support. |
|
|
@frozen What about one minute?
Support
~ Do you want to see the Rabbits David? ~ |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
If you read my post-
Well, interpreted it properly, mweh.
Same thing in the end.
You'd notice I mentioned a 30 second delay.
So they have to be on the WNTS for 30 seconds if they want to advance to S&I.
There you go.
And who's to say it'll appear every time?
Don't be such a pessimist. >:U
Mweh. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
And one full floodcheck is a little long Poke, but what am I saying.
A minute or 30 seconds. Either works. |
|
XandalfJoin Date: 2011-07-18
Post Count: 4416 |
People will have to wait 30 seconds every time they go on the S&I forum? :O |
|
|
|
@Xandalf Let's go to Walmart and buy you some glasses OR get an upgrade.
~ Do you want to see the Rabbits David? ~ |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
:/
"If it's someone's first time on S&I or if the WNTS is updated, they get redirected to the WNTS and can't advance to S&I for 30 seconds."
>"someone's first time on S&I or if the WNTS is updated,"
:\ |
|
XandalfJoin Date: 2011-07-18
Post Count: 4416 |
:/
But guess what? The WNTS are worthless. They say you can't do stuff that gives NBCs or BCs privileges, make pets, (Even though they have pet gear, so they broke their own rules) ect.
:/ |
|
MrBossManJoin Date: 2008-04-10
Post Count: 7206 |
@Xandalf: They say not to suggest pets, likely because they already know we want them and are working on them. And yes, people *shouldn't* ask for more NBC privileges. They'll decide what to give them. Citing a few rules you don't agree with doesn't invalidate the whole list.
I support frozengaia's idea. That's what I was thinking when I saw the title, too--sort of like a Terms of Service agreement. The problem is that they'd have to do a good deal of coding, and they've already stated that it's hard to change one section of the forums without changing them all. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
But guess what?
Let's make the violation of the WNTS a bannable offence, like I said.
You ARE talking to the person who made the WNTS, after all. (Hi!)
Also, they didn't break thier own rules.
The WNTS bans posts that are not going to happen and are oversuggested.
Pets were considered oversuggested.
Should have mentioned the WNTS being a bannable offence when I suggested it... ¬_¬ |
|
|
|
Lots of supports...
~GreatAdventures |
|
tamotiJoin Date: 2009-03-22
Post Count: 707 |
Yeah why not,
it won't stop (all) WNTS posts but maybe at least it will stop the "what is a WNTS" posts.
Quick, don't think about cats! |
|
|