Espithel
#114032252Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:39 PM GMT

Then try to turn that anger into construction Blox. I will not hide that I dislike the idea. But I know that if we go and hate and flame them that it will not work. Simple. Construction will help everyone. Destruction helps no one. And a bug is stopping me from reading Meta's post.
Espithel
#114035499Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:12 PM GMT

Oh well. Bumping time. This rant will fall.
Tesouro
#114036633Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:23 PM GMT

Nice post. Well, what most users don't know is that people behind this kewl website there are employees, that they need to compete with other websites, that they work everyday to fix bugs and create stuff, that they deal with REAL money. The main problem is: this is a free game. Since it's free, people are anonymous, there is no way to control millions of players correctly. They release BC, nice, an upgrade to your game is a simple and efficient way to get money, real money. But the game is still free. If people don't pay, they don't have rights to complain about the product, because they don't buy, but roblox gives the oportunity of giving feedback and community ruin it...
Tesouro
#114037441Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:32 PM GMT

But the solution of roblox economy is not cutting website features and selling them in boxes, using "increase stuff quality" as an excuse. If bad people that copy and scam are a problem, the solution is breaking their legs, it's not too hard and they have authority to do that.
KT13Conversation
#114037890Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:36 PM GMT

Yeah, hope has been lost indeed. Doesn't matter since I don't care 2 cents' worth about this mish-mash of morons called a "community" anymore. There will always be idiots in each sector of the internet. I'll support, though. Doesn't matter if it's rejected, ignored, or accepted anyway.
TheoDel
#114037964Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:37 PM GMT

I enjoyed reading this. Your rant amused me in so many ways...Because it's so dayum true. Can't help but to agree fully with this.
Espithel
#114041762Friday, September 27, 2013 12:18 AM GMT

My thank you mr. Tes, mr. KT13 and mr. Theo. I am suprised this thread is working tbh. Well, bit by bit. Bump
GoodJake00
#114042395Friday, September 27, 2013 12:24 AM GMT

yawn. this is so boring topic.
Tesouro
#114044991Friday, September 27, 2013 12:46 AM GMT

Yeah, Goodjake00, your joke is the essence of entertainment. Useless trolls...
yoshdude44
#114045627Friday, September 27, 2013 12:52 AM GMT

All hope is lost. Our legs are so stiff, we can't move very far. So why is it that we still exist? Maybe having faith, is still on our list. I wanna throw it all away. So I never have to remember, what it did to cause me so much pain. Support.
Tesouro
#114046985Friday, September 27, 2013 1:03 AM GMT

xD nice. The same thing I said in the other reply happens to games, it's not inserting paid access that will remove these "SuddenRush12G" "janlari" "juststeven" that spoil roblox.
Espithel
#114048364Friday, September 27, 2013 1:15 AM GMT

My thank you mr. Yosh. And thanks for bumping my thread whilst I temporarily forgot it existed Tesouro.
Espithel
#114051369Friday, September 27, 2013 1:39 AM GMT

Bump.
Espithel
#114213408Sunday, September 29, 2013 12:53 AM GMT

Bump 3.0... :/
MunimR
#114213869Sunday, September 29, 2013 12:58 AM GMT

Another quality post by frozengaia ;-) But yea, we all get sick of the money hogging updates and no work on getting rid of idiotic games on the front page.
MunimR
#114214744Sunday, September 29, 2013 1:07 AM GMT

Reply to suggestion #0 I personally don't have much say into these price rages, but if roblox wants it like that. Then fine, but they themselves will notice a dip in buying clothing... so instead of raging on the forums I suggest people to just stop buying clothing. Reply to suggestion #1 Yea I like this idea... I'll talk to AcesWayUpHigh and Tone about this idea (Yes I do chat with them every workday, so post quality ideas and I can get them heard.) Reply to suggestion #2 Yea this is a no brainer, and I believe it's planned (Takes a while to format website and databases, so be patient!) Reply to suggestion #3 We all wish it was this easy, but this can't happen... the game online needs to get data for a Shirt to apply it to the character... So... if there is no template link then, no online characters? I assume there are ways, but it aint a top priority of roblox Reply to suggestion #4 I don't get what your saying please elaborate or rephrase?
Espithel
#114215949Sunday, September 29, 2013 1:19 AM GMT

Well, if they can't remove that template link, Can't they just hide the link and make it inaccessible? And for suggestion #4, They want to make buying robux more appealing. The problem is, If you compare robux prices for BC prices, Nearly always you get a similar amount of robux with BC AND other features, compared to just straight up using the money to buy. So basically, give us more robux for buying robux then we would get for BC. "As a rule of thumb: I'd say that for any price of robux you give us, give us 5% more roblox than the nearest BC price that's lower than or equal to the robux price in question overall." There's also a fifth and sixth feature I suggested later on- The fifth is pretty simple- Allow us to sell items for free if we wish, and allow groups to sell for a discounted rate. The sixth is discounting: Basically, each shirt/t-shirt/pant has this thing called three "discount slots"; Basically, you can set a requirement for your item, and anyone who meets the requirement gets a discount. You can make three discounts, all visible to the consumer. And you can discount for: A certain rank in a group, A certain group, A certain person, Friends, Best friends, Has one of your game passes. Just to make things nicer.
Nikola7007
#114216678Sunday, September 29, 2013 1:27 AM GMT

support
Espithel
#114301929Sunday, September 29, 2013 9:24 PM GMT

I'm going to have to bump this. :/ Well, my thanks for the support mr. Nik. Bwamp.
mikeyman12ash
#114302946Sunday, September 29, 2013 9:35 PM GMT

I don't love the idea. One of the solutions would be to lower the price floor to something more reasonable, maybe around 100, which is more than cutting it in half. Another solution would be to provide more up-to-date lua tutorials. The wiki becomes outdated with every lua update and sometimes these things aren't fixed for a while, so employees should take it into their own hands to make sure these tutorials up-to-date. This solution ensures that every user has a fair chance to be successful if they put effort into it, but the thing is, not everyone is willing to put enough effort into it. However, those who are willing will be successful and be largely unchanged by the update "Please do NOT land flying ice cream trucks on the bathers!"
yoshdude44
#114303093Sunday, September 29, 2013 9:37 PM GMT

@mikeyman12ash wdf, i thought you supported this?
mikeyman12ash
#114303328Sunday, September 29, 2013 9:40 PM GMT

@yosh I meant the idea of the price floor meant to type update but sometimes my fingers get ahead of my brain. "Please do NOT land flying ice cream trucks on the bathers!"
Espithel
#114303461Sunday, September 29, 2013 9:42 PM GMT

Well, I did suggest to make it 50 tix, so :/.
Espithel
#114304386Sunday, September 29, 2013 9:51 PM GMT

Needs a bump.
mikeyman12ash
#114304408Sunday, September 29, 2013 9:52 PM GMT

I think 50 is a little low. Cutting it in half would probably still receive hate even though it's 150 at that point I thought finding a number right in the middle of those two would be reasonable so I chose 100 "Please do NOT land flying ice cream trucks on the bathers!"