of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

jimbobucky
Top 100 Poster
#125960469Monday, February 17, 2014 4:58 AM GMT

There are 10 seats. They will fill up. Then, I will proceed to :ff random and the 6/10 ff'ed will play the game. With this way, it rewards people looking out for game threads by getting a 60% chance to play, and it rewards those that don't always get to play with 10 seats rather than 6. Of course, if everyone agrees with this 10-seat rule, then I will ask if we'd rather have 2 seats that GUARANTEE you play, and then 4/8 will play with them, or a 6/10 chance for everyone. If you are not fond of the rule, please by respectful and tell me why.
nintendo566
#125960532Monday, February 17, 2014 4:59 AM GMT

JIM YOU FAT IDIOT OMG DISRESEPCT. like the idea
FIRECAKE
#125960545Monday, February 17, 2014 4:59 AM GMT

do 4 seats that guarantee and 6 wildcard seats wildcard seats are captain's seats
CheeseyMacral
#125960567Monday, February 17, 2014 4:59 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
jimbobucky
Top 100 Poster
#125961101Monday, February 17, 2014 5:06 AM GMT

@fire So you like the overall basis of the idea though? @Cheesey Dude you know I'm against that, but I'm guessing you think that it's still a good idea?
CheeseyMacral
#125961154Monday, February 17, 2014 5:06 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
FIRECAKE
#125961192Monday, February 17, 2014 5:07 AM GMT

yes
nintendo566
#125961225Monday, February 17, 2014 5:07 AM GMT

do 3 game rule not 2.
jimbobucky
Top 100 Poster
#125966418Monday, February 17, 2014 6:19 AM GMT

b
jimbobucky
Top 100 Poster
#125967209Monday, February 17, 2014 6:34 AM GMT

Well if nobody has anything to say
jimbobucky
Top 100 Poster
#126035896Monday, February 17, 2014 11:58 PM GMT

bump
DeadMan253
#126036021Monday, February 17, 2014 11:59 PM GMT

so remind me how is this going to fix the problem other than people getting screwed by a randomizer.
Romoism
#126036136Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:00 AM GMT

^^^^^^
UglyMoose
#126037373Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:13 AM GMT

Just wait for lots of people to get here and then FF random. No seats, or obbys or anything required.
DeadMan253
#126037524Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:14 AM GMT

FF random like, 10 people if they show up, no one can play 3 games in a row. Ta-da.
EastCoastXI
#126037707Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:16 AM GMT

That's a dumb idea it ruin a the season.
tgross25
#126037789Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:17 AM GMT

"That's a dumb idea it ruin a the season."
vikingsfan397
#126037868Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:17 AM GMT

i like this, but you should have a better chance of getting on a seat if you haven't made it on before, rather than people who get it every time who will then get a worse chance
jimbobucky
Top 100 Poster
#126037898Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:18 AM GMT

"so remind me how is this going to fix the problem other than people getting screwed by a randomizer. " You guys complain about the same people playing over and over again right? How the current system favors faster computers and campers? The 10-seat rule doesn't totally favor the campers, and doesn't guarantee them a spot. 10 seats is also enough for people just lurking on the SF. And please go into further detail on how they would get "screwed" by the randomizer. A 60% chance of getting through is pretty good, and better than say, a 40% chance if I had more than 10 seats. It's also better than a 0% chance of never playing because you can never get a seat...Such as someone like yourself.
jimbobucky
Top 100 Poster
#126038287Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:21 AM GMT

So now I will wait for a response, I really do hope you have one. It seems as though this will never be solved because nobody can agree on just one thing.
DeadMan253
#126038523Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:23 AM GMT

So now I will wait for a response, I really do hope you have one. It seems as though this will never be solved because nobody can agree on just one thing. kinda what i've been getting at for awhile now.
jimbobucky
Top 100 Poster
#126038812Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:26 AM GMT

A response about the randomizer maybe? "FF random like, 10 people if they show up, no one can play 3 games in a row. Ta-da." in depth pls?
DeadMan253
#126038915Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:27 AM GMT

your idea of FFing random people, but a limit on how many games someone may play in a row, no person may play 3 games in a row, 2 games is fine, but must sit the next game IF they show up, if a game is played and they don't show, then they can play the next game.
koolboy123
#126039121Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:28 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
jimbobucky
Top 100 Poster
#126039419Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:31 AM GMT

@Sens I want to give the people who actually wait and care for games an advantage though, hence the seats. Waiting for people and :ff random would give everyone a roughly 40% chance of playing, even the people who were waiting for the game for a while, compared to those who are just looking to play a "ro-hockey scrimmage". @Moldy I thought you were over the loss @Vikings noted. But remember that this league isn't always about "equal playing time" anymore, it's about competing for spots and trying to make the final (which really isn't THAT hard). This new idea is opening the doors for more playing time for others though, so I'm glad you're on par with it.

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right