|
the siggy auto-typer or whatever, seems to be removed . . . ? |
|
EchoitJoin Date: 2011-10-31
Post Count: 17577 |
Yes.
That's the rule! |
|
|
i can PM you the link to siggy automator
riggy sucks
getting banned? >first world problems< | @Growlithe99 |
|
EchoitJoin Date: 2011-10-31
Post Count: 17577 |
@Growlithe
What's so bad about Riggy?
That's the rule! |
|
|
It seems to be working fine.
Even better than the siggy auto-typer did.
- [Qué una carga pesada es un nombre que ha llegado a ser demasiado famoso.] - |
|
|
say you get floodchecked
normally, you can press back and your text will be there
but with riggy,
when you press back, your siggy deletes the text you previously had
getting banned? >first world problems< | @Growlithe99 |
|
thergomasJoin Date: 2008-09-16
Post Count: 3823 |
[rfa#purgedbyauthor] |
|
EchoitJoin Date: 2011-10-31
Post Count: 17577 |
oh gosh yes pls link me 2 dat
That's the rule! |
|
|
just got it
The man is a woman. |
|
|
@tiger.
I do think that may be a downfall of riggy.
But it is the ONLY available siggy-typer.
- [Yo quería tener éxito, no famosa] - |
|
|
@thelone
no it isn't
i still use it
for some reason, it doesn't show up in the chrome store when you search for it
but when you go to the link it still works
getting banned? >first world problems< | @Growlithe99 |
|
|
Oh.
Mind giving me a link?
Try linking a twitter link leading to a post containing the link to the page, so you don't get banned for off-site link.
- [Yo quería tener éxito, no famosa] - |
|
|
k
https://twitter.com/Growlithe99/status/464172576042807296
getting banned? >first world problems< | @Growlithe99 |
|
|
Thank you, tiger.
-[Yo quería tener éxito, no famosa]- |
|