of     1   

ShawnGalamer
#135951624Wednesday, June 04, 2014 3:49 AM GMT

I comment i read said "good economies shouldn't be fair so the better people raise to the top and the losers stay losers" i agree i think the go-getters shouldn't be penalized because of scrubs. The economy should be survival of the fittest. You have to do whatever it takes to raise to the top. Scamming is never scamming because if the trader is stupid its called sharking its taking advantage of scrubs which i do sometimes.
XxspetnazerxX
#135954141Wednesday, June 04, 2014 4:21 AM GMT

No... Apparantly, those who couldn't buy BC would be eaten by the predators.
lottery248
#135955009Wednesday, June 04, 2014 4:34 AM GMT

^
BIoodIusts
#135961796Wednesday, June 04, 2014 7:00 AM GMT

It kind of already is this policy. If you change the meaning of survival to "having more robux" or "lots of stuff" And if you change the meaning of fittest to "everyone with a type of membership". It is already happening.
Naruto9200
#135961997Wednesday, June 04, 2014 7:05 AM GMT

Do you know what the phrase "survival of the fittest" means?

    of     1