Funnypauljohn321New
#138729358Monday, June 30, 2014 11:18 AM GMT

400th poster
Jascha
#138729383Monday, June 30, 2014 11:19 AM GMT

@SuperHero12346 Ohh my godliness Lmmfao!!! This thread just got better! Genius ideas, cool people, and the Sunday morning entertainment! Never seen someone control a troll before :P "Yeah you better leave!" was all he could sayyyy! XD
Lacryma
#138729464Monday, June 30, 2014 11:21 AM GMT

@jas hey 0d'er how about u go ahead and red more i just crashed this op's idea i think roblocks will be nice though and will give him a roblocks lollipop 4 effort
Jascha
#138729570Monday, June 30, 2014 11:23 AM GMT

@duelingwarlord You call that a flaw? Places open from the website; they're not ON the website. That makes no sense. Nice try, though. But the fish is still smarter than you.
Lacryma
#138729767Monday, June 30, 2014 11:28 AM GMT

and when i went on the site, you had to be logged into ROBLOCKS, so the idea is still bust. u r an idiot so i know that u wont get it
Jascha
#138730034Monday, June 30, 2014 11:33 AM GMT

@duelingwarlord Wow, you really didn't read it did you? <:o "- Now whenever someone's Place becomes a Bought Place, the Place disappears from the developer's Place list, and it remains on the page. If the Bought Place is sold to a website it still appears on the Games page, but clicking it links to the website that it has been sold to. It has the same page layout on that specific webpage, but the background and style design is the same as the new website it is on. The Online tab (with Party and Player chat) remains as well as the toolbars at the top of the actual ROBLOX website but it disappears when you go to a part of that website that doesn't have a ROBLOX Place. The creator of the Place is still shown, but the Bought Place moves to the Bought Places game page and it is removed from their profile to show that ROBLOX has full rights to it now. ROBLOX is basically expanding to other sites with this update." -- you're still logged in, bro. Should've done your homework. Now you can't play ball. Quit tripping over yourself and read the idea you're trying to poke holes in. -the "0der"
Lacryma
#138730213Monday, June 30, 2014 11:37 AM GMT

" but clicking it links to the website that it has been sold to. It has the same page layout on that specific webpage, but the background and style design is the same as the new website it is on. The Online tab (with Party and Player chat) remains as well as the toolbars at the top of the actual ROBLOX website but it disappears when you go to a part of that website that doesn't have a ROBLOX Place. The creator of the Place is still shown, but the Bought Place moves to the Bought Places game page and it is removed from their profile to show that ROBLOX has full rights to it now. ROBLOX is basically expanding to other sites with this update." not only is that stupid but no companies would do dis. if i am a company that bought the game, I don't want it "owned to roblox", i bought all commercial rights and I want it on MY WEBSITE WHERE PEOPLE WILL CLICK NOW. this is what a good company would think. so stay in school and learn more about business before you try to act the expert.
Jascha
#138730489Monday, June 30, 2014 11:43 AM GMT

/e shakes head Any company would reason enough to allow people to PLAY THE GAME. ROBLOX gives ad rights and game rights to them so they get everything. Businesses know it's all about the money. Why do you think they do what they do? What that does doesn't hurt them at all. It actually helps them so more than just guests can play, and the players will be their starting income and traffic which they build on. Publicity, money, endorsements, fame, without work Why would they say no? See you should really read the idea. You'd be better at poking holes in something you know about.
Lacryma
#138730648Monday, June 30, 2014 11:47 AM GMT

what if the company does not want it to be free
Lucario1236
#138730782Monday, June 30, 2014 11:50 AM GMT

You should join our cause duelingwarlord. Right now you're making us look really good :) And I don't think you really believe in your side anymore. Forget about ruin3ds he was just mad man. We could use another supporter.
Jascha
#138730947Monday, June 30, 2014 11:53 AM GMT

@duelingwarlord May I ask what you mean by free? If you mean if they don't want the visits to be free then I would say they wouldn't want them to cost anything. They need the traffic that's how websites mainly make money. Making it free to play would garuntee more players. I'm sure that websites could do what they want with their new places, though.
Lacryma
#138731342Monday, June 30, 2014 12:03 PM GMT

this idea is so stupid, since i am supr famus i will talK with my admin frends, they will all think ur idea is stuped. dont worry i woll tell them to give u roblocks lollipop 4 effort
Jascha
#138731462Monday, June 30, 2014 12:05 PM GMT

Fine Anakin, wander into the troll side. Have your fun. I'm going to bed because I'm tired and this is now a waste of my time. I'm sure someone else will show up shortly to entertain you. Good night.
Lacryma
#138731504Monday, June 30, 2014 12:06 PM GMT

oh i c, u finally c that i am superior in smartness and given up, this idea is a fail and will not werk NO SUPPORT
Jascha
#138731510Monday, June 30, 2014 12:07 PM GMT

Person below me is a troll (unless they're not duelingwarlord) >:3
Lacryma
#138731566Monday, June 30, 2014 12:08 PM GMT

dude ur fre modle comments won't werk on m3 use that for that 10 robux hat u cant afford
CVW
#138731603Monday, June 30, 2014 12:09 PM GMT

Again I would like to state that this idea overcomplicates a fairly straightforward process.
Lacryma
#138731702Monday, June 30, 2014 12:11 PM GMT

most of the posters/OP should take a business class after they finish elementary school
Thane_1
#138732056Monday, June 30, 2014 12:19 PM GMT

TL;DW the TL:DR.
deathmorge
#138734679Monday, June 30, 2014 1:10 PM GMT

I'm liking the concept of this..
bloppers912
#138740913Monday, June 30, 2014 2:51 PM GMT

this will literally never happen even if this thread gets like millions of supports roblox won't apply it gg
0_0
#138744646Monday, June 30, 2014 3:42 PM GMT

Yeah this is never going to happen. People will continue to buy BC and robux for a long time. Especially since a lot of new good games are coming out, I'm not sure if you've seen "Silence" that was released around a week ago but that has some interesting gameplay. Also, I don't think businesses will pay $10,000-$25,000 for a game that was made on ROBLOX. I could be wrong here of course, you would have to have a extremely good game and probably would have to spend like a year working on it. ROBLOX makes money from advertisements on here anyway, if you're not a builders club member then there's around two advertisements on every page you go on - millions of robloxians on ROBLOX.com makes money. Some developers are making more than $1000 anyway (10% cut of $10,000) if you've read the blog TheGamer101 made $10,000 in a single month. I don't see your idea happening any time soon, sorry.
goldfishmemories
#138771798Monday, June 30, 2014 8:04 PM GMT

Lol my thread when I'm asleep am I right? I think it's time that the "stupid" "elementary school" OP defends his own thread, if only for a minute. First off I would like to thank everyone who supported while I left. I'd also like to thank the thread defenders who defended the thread while I was gone; I couldn't have handled it any better myself. And now I'd like to argue for my idea: @CVW I understand what you're saying, and I've noticed you've repeated yourself a lot. I guess I'll grant you a direct response: 1) The only ROBLOX system removed in this update is buying BC and R$. Everything else is still there. This update changes a lot, but at the same time not really. It changes a lot of a certain aspect of ROBLOX, which is its main source of profit. 2) The system becomes more complicated in its mechanisms, but how it plays out is actually very, very simple. So simple I could summarize it in a paragraph: - Someone builds good game - ROBLOX sees good game - ROBLOX offers the BC exchange agreement in exchange for that place - ROBLOX sells that game to another website - That website gets garunteed profit due to the amount of players already playing and linking and the amount of players to come. - It starts over You could still not accept the BC exchange, but you end up making more money with it. Not to mention the DevEx is there no matter what you do (Yeah it will be different; probably higher). @Kingstarwest This was an interesting spin-off of a point that is already contradicted. By this link: www.addictinggames.com/shooting-games/roblox-game.jsp And yes this link is entirely legit. ROBLOX is interested in at least partnering with other websites brought their own places. And I have a polished system to this, that not only FIXES INFLATION, And MAKES ROBLOX MORE MONEY, but also GIVES THE PLAYERS A BETTER EXPERIENCE. And let me point out that this is an optional path; an encouraged pay, but optional. You'd actually be better off with this money-wise than anything else. People like TheGamer101 probably used DevEx to make their money, which by the way, will still exist and fully function with this update no matter what. R$ and BC purchases cause inflation (read my long post on page 2 or my question and answer post on page 1), which is why I provided substitute purchases, which in my opinion is a better system, because ROBLOX won't and will not need to continue to need money from purchases with this update so effects will be permanent to your account. And it allows more currency circulation into ROBLOX because inflation won't exist, and therefore more freedom. Places can make that much. That is the same average that any flash game would make if sold, even one not many play. And places are garunteed money makers because of the ads and player traffic that come with it. They'll make whatever money they spend on it back. And this update will increase ROBLOX players and accounts by a big margin, which will help the system work in itself. @duelingwarlord Maybe try? @bloppers912 You've said that so many times and it has been countered and negated already. Sorry if it got a little long.
bloppers912
#138779126Monday, June 30, 2014 9:07 PM GMT

"@bloppers912 You've said that so many times and it has been countered and negated already." but its true??
marc12267
#138785783Monday, June 30, 2014 10:06 PM GMT

Remember when I sent that to Sorcus? He said no. :(