[RHL] qualifications for goalie of the year need to go down

Join Date: 2010-04-20
Post Count: 61665

#139701576Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:14 AM GMT

as of now, you must have 200 shots against by the end of the season to qualify however, i feel this eliminates goalies on defensive teams that only face 5 or 6 shots a game, but save them all i believe the requirement to qualify for goalie of the year should be 150 shots against Iᴛ ᴀɪɴᴛ ᴇᴀsʏ, ʙᴇɪɴɢ Cʜᴇᴇsᴇʏ.

habs100

Join Date: 2010-09-01
Post Count: 5475

#139701757Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:16 AM GMT

If you get 5 or 6 shots per game, chances are none of them were REALLY good shots... The minimum should be kept at 200, the limit also eliminates goalies that are inactive, but played well for the 4 games that they showed up to.

EastCoastXI

Join Date: 2012-02-10
Post Count: 14262

#139701854Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:17 AM GMT

You won't get to 150 in 4 games.

CheeseyMacral

Join Date: 2010-04-20
Post Count: 61665

#139701884Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:17 AM GMT

except often times teams like the dolans are up against teams like phoenix, and we score 8 goals, and they get like 4 SOG because they suck so bad the goalie can't do anything about that Iᴛ ᴀɪɴᴛ ᴇᴀsʏ, ʙᴇɪɴɢ Cʜᴇᴇsᴇʏ.

habs100

Join Date: 2010-09-01
Post Count: 5475

#139702134Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:19 AM GMT

@Moldy That's what I'm saying. If the limit were taken down, then goalies that show up to like 4 games could still win the Vezina.

habs100

Join Date: 2010-09-01
Post Count: 5475

#139702299Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:21 AM GMT

Also without the limit, it would make goalies on teams like the Dolans auto-win the Vezina, while goalies like myself being on Montreal, have no shot at all

cat14414

Join Date: 2010-11-03
Post Count: 1090

#139702339Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:21 AM GMT

175?

cat14414

Join Date: 2010-11-03
Post Count: 1090

#139702475Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:22 AM GMT

I would make it at least near 160

tgross25

Join Date: 2009-10-26
Post Count: 37268

#139702497Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:22 AM GMT

It should be games played not shots against Like 12 games played or something

FIRECAKE

Join Date: 2009-02-28
Post Count: 25167

#139702583Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:23 AM GMT

why are you doing shots against when it should obviously be games played

HFCLeftRobloxKTHX

Join Date: 2011-07-21
Post Count: 4505

#139704781Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:43 AM GMT

There shouldnt be a shots against limit. It should be determined by gking stats "IDC WHY ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT THIS AND NOT GETTING ME UNSUSPENDED CMON I HAVE ASSBURGERS!?" Mr. Recon responded.

coolhockeyplayer8

Join Date: 2012-07-10
Post Count: 1523

#139707927Wednesday, July 09, 2014 1:10 AM GMT

"There shouldnt be a shots against limit. It should be determined by gking stats" Ok, so lets say I am a back-up GK for my team and I have to play 5 minutes in the 3rd period. I face 2 shots on goal and save them both. I now have a 1.0% Save percentage with tops everyone below me. Is that fair to a GK who has allowed 1 goal on 200 shots faced who has a .995% save percentage? "BeMad"~AAA

cat14414

Join Date: 2010-11-03
Post Count: 1090

#139708411Wednesday, July 09, 2014 1:14 AM GMT

I once had 1.000% lol in s11

TinyBerry3

Join Date: 2008-06-07
Post Count: 30001

#139709374Wednesday, July 09, 2014 1:24 AM GMT

If the goalkeeper is not tested he can't prove that he's good. iSS had the same issue, but he lived with it. We all know Comic is one of the best goalies in the league, and he could very well win the most SO's award anyway.