iGhostpelt
#145839471Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:23 PM GMT

i can continue... but from the court cases i gave... im "10 points ahead" and if you read my original post it says that you must follow all rules of copyright and in those rules... the government does have a section that says that authors/creators can give permissions and make rules on what people can do with their works as long as it follows the rules of copyright... which all of mine do. want me to post as much of the copyright laws as possible (some parts are blocked by roblox which is why i did say in my last post where to go to find the rules.
DieSoft
#145839542Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:26 PM GMT

Pretty sure I'm 11 steps ahead, since I clearly hold copyrights for the name. :o
iGhostpelt
#145839559Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:26 PM GMT

§ 106 . Exclusive rights in copyrighted works38 Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly; (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission. § 106A . Rights of certain authors to attribution and integrity39 (a) Rights of Attribution and Integrity.—Subject to section 107 and independent of the exclusive rights provided in section 106, the author of a work of visual art— (1) shall have the right— (A) to claim authorship of that work, and (B) to prevent the use of his or her name as the author of any work of visual art which he or she did not create; (2) shall have the right to prevent the use of his or her name as the author of the work of visual art in the event of a distortion, mutilation, or other modification of the work which would be prejudicial to his or her honor or reputation; and (3) subject to the limitations set forth in section 113(d), shall have the right— (A) to prevent any intentional distortion, mutilation, or other modification of that work which would be prejudicial to his or her honor or reputation, and any intentional distortion, mutilation, or modification of that work is a violation of that right, and (B) to prevent any destruction of a work of recognized stature, and any intentional or grossly negligent destruction of that work is a violation of that right. (b) Scope and Exercise of Rights.—Only the author of a work of visual art has the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work, whether or not the author is the copyright owner. The authors of a joint work of visual art are coowners of the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work. (c) Exceptions.—(1) The modification of a work of visual art which is the result of the passage of time or the inherent nature of the materials is not a distortion, mutilation, or other modification described in subsection (a)(3)(A). (2) The modification of a work of visual art which is the result of conservation, or of the public presentation, including lighting and placement, of the work is not a destruction, distortion, mutilation, or other modification described in subsection (a)(3) unless the modification is caused by gross negligence. (3) The rights described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) shall not apply to any reproduction, depiction, portrayal, or other use of a work in, upon, or in any connection with any item described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of the definition of “work of visual art” in section 101, and any such reproduction, depiction, portrayal, or other use of a work is not a destruction, distortion, mutilation, or other modification described in paragraph (3) of subsection (a). (d) Duration of Rights.—(1) With respect to works of visual art created on or after the effective date set forth in section 610(a) of the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990, the rights conferred by subsection (a) shall endure for a term consisting of the life of the author. (2) With respect to works of visual art created before the effective date set forth in section 610(a) of the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990, but title to which has not, as of such effective date, been transferred from the author, the rights conferred by subsection (a) shall be coextensive with, and shall expire at the same time as, the rights conferred by section 106. (3) In the case of a joint work prepared by two or more authors, the rights conferred by subsection (a) shall endure for a term consisting of the life of the last surviving author. (4) All terms of the rights conferred by subsection (a) run to the end of the calendar year in which they would otherwise expire. (e) Transfer and Waiver.—(1) The rights conferred by subsection (a) may not be transferred, but those rights may be waived if the author expressly agrees to such waiver in a written instrument signed by the author. Such instrument shall specifically identify the work, and uses of that work, to which the waiver applies, and the waiver shall apply only to the work and uses so identified. In the case of a joint work prepared by two or more authors, a waiver of rights under this paragraph made by one such author waives such rights for all such authors. (2) Ownership of the rights conferred by subsection (a) with respect to a work of visual art is distinct from ownership of any copy of that work, or of a copyright or any exclusive right under a copyright in that work. Transfer of ownership of any copy of a work of visual art, or of a copyright or any exclusive right under a copyright, shall not constitute a waiver of the rights conferred by subsection (a). Except as may otherwise be agreed by the author in a written instrument signed by the author, a waiver of the rights conferred by subsection (a) with respect to a work of visual art shall not constitute a transfer of ownership of any copy of that work, or of ownership of a copyright or of any exclusive right under a copyright in that work. § 107 . Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
iGhostpelt
#145839674Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:30 PM GMT

want to keep trying? or do i have to post more rules and regulations all which will support me and my side. if need be ill send in a cease and desist letter (properly written and signed by the proper authorities)
Insangelous
#145839727Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:32 PM GMT

heh
DieSoft
#145839768Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:33 PM GMT

Not to be rude or anything, but you do realise that no one cares about your copyright talk since it isn't legit? It doesn't matter how many sections of the copyright laws you copy and paste, no one will read them and no one will believe nor really care about how you got "copyrights" for "Soulclan", whatever that is supposed to be. :|
SoulSpin
#145839794Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:34 PM GMT

copying and pasting irrelevant laws aren't helping you at all 1v1 me league: charly9011 | rip c&g - 7/2/2014
iGhostpelt
#145840101Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:44 PM GMT

as written in the original post there is instruction on how to get to the copyright links and codes. if you think they are not legitimate, please fill out the proper paper work and file a report. ty for all your worthless and illegitimate posts. if you would like to continue to harass me, try to commit libel, slander, defamation, or infringe on my copyrights, please contact your family lawyer if you have one, give them the link to this forum, and then kindly back off before I sue you. here are 2 sets of lawyers u can contact if you dont have a lawyer Copyright infringement attorney Dana LeJune Simmons Hanly Conroy good luck morons
DonFeskeral
#145840192Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:46 PM GMT

Soulclan is my copyrighted property If you dont stop attempting to take my IP I will give out yours, 165.23.56.286
DieSoft
#145840202Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:46 PM GMT

There is absolutely no one who cares enough about this to actually do anything of that. It is only you who act like if this was an actual think, we all are literally having a laugh at you. :|
SoulSpin
#145840208Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:47 PM GMT

pretty sure he's been flame baiting now 1v1 me league: charly9011 | rip c&g - 7/2/2014
SoulSpin
#145840240Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:47 PM GMT

i don't think anyone could be this much of an idiot 1v1 me league: charly9011 | rip c&g - 7/2/2014
iGhostpelt
#145840273Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:48 PM GMT

https://en.help.roblox.com/entries/31328550 any other questions about roblox's stance on copyright infringment go to the link above
DonFeskeral
#145840298Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:49 PM GMT

diesoft is right just checked a IP lookup site and found nothing
DonFeskeral
#145840365Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:51 PM GMT

0oh nooess op is gonna cease and desist me!
iGhostpelt
#145840435Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:53 PM GMT

IP look up sites only look for IP addresses noob. and under TOS you cant stalk me
DonFeskeral
#145840463Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:54 PM GMT

you idiot I mean intellectual property LOL there is no copyrighted "Soulclan" matter a fact I think I'll buy it myself
Bredf
#145840625Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:00 PM GMT

ok so with don's post i guess the argument is ended is C&G's favor
DieSoft
#145840694Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:01 PM GMT

If it isn't too expensive buy it and contact the ROBLOX support and have them shut his group down, it would be a legendary moment in the history of C&G. No idea how much these things cost tho, never really looked into it. :o
DonFeskeral
#145840730Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:03 PM GMT

its gonna be a lotta work but I think I am gonna go try to buy it LOL
iGhostpelt
#145842644Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:57 PM GMT

to buy it you first need to buy a copy from the author... and im not selling, then you would have to try to copyright it, which would send up red flags. and finally you would message roblox, they would find you in the process of a criminal action and your account would be banned... so good luck trying to buy it btw... to copyright every bit of it, you would need over $500 since each form is $55 and you would need to submit a lot of forms for all of soulclan
PastorCond
#145842963Thursday, September 11, 2014 7:05 PM GMT

lol at first I thought this was a troll now I realize this for the stupid it is
EmperorRyzoft
#145843190Thursday, September 11, 2014 7:10 PM GMT

Once, there was a clan named Soulclan, I emperorryzoft was the founder of the clan, I then came onto make it a free name for all. I made Soulclan! It's for the free soul's of the universe.
Bredf
#145843252Thursday, September 11, 2014 7:12 PM GMT

I thought this guy actually was a bit smart, but after that last post, I can say my idiocy meter completely broke.
DarknessRepeats
#145843265Thursday, September 11, 2014 7:12 PM GMT

oh my god this kid