of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

Total_Anger
#141816650Monday, July 28, 2014 6:22 AM GMT

Hi, my name is TheAsphaltDevll, and i am very much into groups. My roblox life is pretty much entirely group centered. I don't know why but groups are a lot of fun, and it also is for many other robloxians and of course the leaders of those groups. When i create my own group, i ALWAYS establish the idea with one of my friends, never alone. That makes us co founders. However, the roblox system prevents us from my friend and i equally sharing authority like we want to. Roblox only lets there be one technical leader in a group at a time. Of course, there is the alternative, which is to give the next rank below all the permissions and call it a co founder or something along those lines. But lets compare it to if there were multiple group leaders. ----By the way, this whole feature will be optional.---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To begin: the standard way. Im going to use my group "T - Create" as an example. in T - Create, sergentawesome21, shreck1254, and i co created it. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group owner: TheAsphaltDevll Ranks- Co founder Asphalt (rank 255) Co founders Serg and Shreck (rank 254) (other rank) (rank 13) (other rank) (rank 3) To me, and probably a lot of other people, that just doesn't feel right. It feels like even though we're all co founders, that i have more authority over the other two co founders. But i shouldn't. The way roblox groups are set up makes it sort of biased, and lower ranked members will not respect shreck or serg as much as they respect me, even though we are all supposed to be equal. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now lets look at what it would be like if there were multiple group leaders. Group owners: TheAsphaltDevll, Shreck1254, sergentawesome21 Ranks- Co founders (rank 255) (other rank) (rank 254) (other rank) (rank 253) This already looks much better. Regular members are going to immediately know there is more than one leader, base on the context of the group page. There is no more bias. All co leaders will be respected equally and there will be no bickering about who gets the top spot. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So, in conclusion, you could see why having the option of multiple group leaders could greatly improve the world of groups and helps reduce bias, not getting proper respect, fighting amongst leaders, etc. By replying to this thread you support the idea of having the option to have multiple group leaders. Thanks for reading Signed, TheAsphaltDevll -i apologize ahead of time for typos.
Total_Anger
#141848339Monday, July 28, 2014 5:02 PM GMT

Bump
ragemagick
#141850224Monday, July 28, 2014 5:25 PM GMT

nl;er (Not long; easy read) If you trust people to be responsible enough then sure. Support. They'll probably make it cost something though. Probably same cost as it costs to make a rank.
KasangaROBLOX
#141850329Monday, July 28, 2014 5:26 PM GMT

Nice! Support.
Tigeon
#141850524Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28 PM GMT

like clash of clans leader co leader high blab and that
Tigeon
#141850660Monday, July 28, 2014 5:30 PM GMT

and yes support
CactusLuvsYou
#141850935Monday, July 28, 2014 5:33 PM GMT

There should always be one leader who owns the group If you have multiple leaders, who have the authorization to alter the group, just imagine. | ~ Did you know there 626 species of Cactus? ~ |
nathan15051
#141853245Monday, July 28, 2014 6:03 PM GMT

@Cactus People, like me, could put their alts as the same rank as their main.
Total_Anger
#142021285Wednesday, July 30, 2014 12:55 AM GMT

bump
HollieSparkles
#142021443Wednesday, July 30, 2014 12:57 AM GMT

CLANSCRUB
Total_Anger
#142049071Wednesday, July 30, 2014 6:07 AM GMT

Remember hollie, by replying to this thread you are supporting my idea. Did you read the thread carefully?
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#142050320Wednesday, July 30, 2014 6:26 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Maliciously_Intended
#142051875Wednesday, July 30, 2014 6:53 AM GMT

Support, there is no major flaw to this idea. How about checking out my idea? http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=21
HollieSparkles
#142062430Wednesday, July 30, 2014 11:20 AM GMT

no. now that you think you can do it that way. get out
CoolBraham_Lincoln
#142062477Wednesday, July 30, 2014 11:22 AM GMT

Wnts no support kill yourselves
Freindlyguestnoob
#142062726Wednesday, July 30, 2014 11:28 AM GMT

no support. People could get killed
xThisIsUltraPwning
#142065157Wednesday, July 30, 2014 12:25 PM GMT

why not making 3 leader ranks
Total_Anger
#142202387Thursday, July 31, 2014 7:14 PM GMT

How is this a wnts?
Total_Anger
#142401501Saturday, August 02, 2014 8:05 PM GMT

Please remember this feature is optional, if you do not tust the other co founders, just disable the feature.
CometTheDarkLord
#142401886Saturday, August 02, 2014 8:09 PM GMT

So many clan haters lel. I support this idea completely. This also gives more room for other ranks. Is it possible that if you want to co own a group you can pitch in to creating the group? like, if 4 people co own a group could they split it to everyone pays 25? Also, if you do co-own do you have to have BC? `Bow down to my siggy`
Total_Anger
#142483981Sunday, August 03, 2014 4:48 PM GMT

@comet, i didn't think about spliting robux to buy the group. that is a good idea. Also, atleast one co founder must have builders club.
Total_Anger
#142578079Monday, August 04, 2014 2:47 PM GMT

bump
grantox
#142578169Monday, August 04, 2014 2:48 PM GMT

Support.
mikkjal134
#142578352Monday, August 04, 2014 2:51 PM GMT

posting on a thread doesn't mean you automatically support an idea. Just saying. I however, do support this. If say your example, this would be needed. If I were to make a group with my rl friend he would have less authority even if we said we have the same. This is one of the best ideas I have seen today.
Total_Anger
#142578868Monday, August 04, 2014 3:00 PM GMT

Thank you! By the way, i said that so posts like hollies are useless.

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right