|
It shouldnt have any copy right issues from ANYONE if I got permisson+put name somewhere on it.
So I should have a right to upload this.
Even if it is minecraft, Im not doing anything to revoke its copyright. |
|
|
#BringBackrevenge I support this.... |
|
|
What I/we meant was, the issue probably has little to do with copyright and more to do with business rivalries. |
|
|
@King
Lol, Roblox is rivaled with Minecraft.
They are two different games. Nothing is really the same. Plus they are too different.
As in rivals they both do the same thing, but try to be better.
This isnt Roblox and Minecraft.
More like Blockland and Minecraft. |
|
|
I don't control what Roblox does. We used to not even be allowed to even say "Minecraft". |
|
|
Plus minecraft doesnt own the song. Jordon/CaptainSparklez does. |
|
|
"No support
Copy right here is also against the rules."
It's called fair use, idiot. |
|
|
|
Waste of an L4D[2]
burn in jigoku, then get killed by konngara!11 | OT/RTer Zvar, the evil magic 8 ball | /ERogXTo |
|
|
support
for the record if you upload anything similar to roblox such as minecraft and yes,
even lego
(not to say anything about their hypocritical little disclaimer. ahem. "ROBLOX, "Online Building Toy", characters, logos, names, and all related indicia are trademarks of ROBLOX Corporation, ©2014. Patents pending. ROBLOX is not sponsored, authorized or endorsed by any producer of plastic building bricks, including The LEGO Group, MEGA Brands, and K'Nex, and no resemblance to the products of these companies is intended. Use of this site signifies your acceptance of the Terms and Conditions.")
but uh, they go totally ape sht. |
|
level44Join Date: 2012-05-05
Post Count: 4 |
Ok ok I understand the reason why this was deleted and it's a valid reason, Any company can charge ROBLOX at any time for copyright infringement, Because about 5 audios a day are copyrighted songs, ROBLOX is also forced to pay the US government for this reason, But minecraft is so popular, The copyright charge could be anywhere around thousands of dollars, ROBLOX is already spending a lot of money for taxes, they can't afford to lose anymore money. |
|
|
Supporters are no lives who play minecraft 24/7 |
|
|
|
moon1141Join Date: 2013-05-04
Post Count: 16 |
i thing read desc to runtrune this has a swear word in it or some thing gross that not allowed |
|
marshsayJoin Date: 2008-07-21
Post Count: 25199 |
You don't have a "right" to upload anything here. This is their site and they are under no obligation to allow you to upload anything you want. They've got rules written and unwritten, and they are the ones with rights here, not you, in this case, their right to enforce the rules of the site that THEY own and run. |
|
|
Revenge is so awesome. go captainsparklez!
And like people have said before, ROBLOX is getting all nuts with this copyright crud and deleting minecraft clothing, places, and audio.
I lost 200 tix thanks to it :(
It only would've been 10 IF IT WEREN'T for the price floor. stupid updates
ANYWAYS
BACK TO THE TOPIC
i support dis message
#MianiteHelp ~rekting nubs since January 2013~
im gona have to agree with that its like roblox does not care about us roblox i dont care about u im still not gona even care about u if u even die exept erik erik died :( i was a hacker on roblox i would probily hack the whole website of roblox so i can mess up everything so they cant fix it but doing that is impossible :P i just hate roblox also roblox just has terrible terrible TERRIBLE TERRIBLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE UPDATES roblox go home U R D#UNK -.- this is y i hate roblox >:o |
|
|
videofindersTV and hearsay foro has the right to upload this fgtish idiot |
|
marshsayJoin Date: 2008-07-21
Post Count: 25199 |
have fun being banned logan |
|
|
I support it's so unfair to have it deleted! |
|
|
Common misunderstandings
Acknowledgment of the source makes a use fair.
Giving the name of the photographer or author may help, but it is not sufficient on its own. While plagiarism and copyright violation are related matters—-both can, at times, involve failure to properly credit sources—-they are not identical. Plagiarism—using someone's words, ideas, images, etc. without acknowledgment—is a matter of professional ethics. Copyright is a matter of law, and protects exact expression, not ideas. One can plagiarize even a work that is not protected by copyright, such as trying to pass off a line from Shakespeare as one's own. On the other hand, citing sources generally prevents accusations of plagiarism, but is an insufficient defense against copyright violations. For example, reprinting a copyrighted book without permission, while citing the original author, would be copyright infringement but not plagiarism. |
|
iwuvepicJoin Date: 2013-04-02
Post Count: 11 |
I guess i support it |
|
|
|
|