|
"Hi, I'm Rikaius, a ten-year old gamer who lives in Canada." >Good for you
"Today, I've inspected several servers of games, and about a third of them had messed up baseplates, types of editing, un-expected admin abuse, and others."
• No complaints, except for your grammar.
"Today, I would like to tell you how ROBLOX may be able to revert hacking into its normal state, added fun."
• It is called exploiting, not hacking.
• Sometimes "added fun" can be irritating for the users who are not exploiting.
• Are you saying that exploiters do not exploit for fun anymore?
"Now, I must tell you I am addicted to ROBLOX." >Good for you [2]
"But for several years I was broken by many friendships by hackers."
• What?
"They always disrupt gaming, in hope to get the game shut down. (Or so I've been told.)"
• Not always.
• You literally just said that exploiting is just added fun.
"In this process, developers could make their game unavailable to people with certain type of cheats, which could disrupt the game if possible."
• How is this related to the above sentence?
• How exactly do you propose that ROBLOX stop these exploits? Are you implying that ROBLOX does not already try to stop exploits?
"There is also known to be good hackers, who share their overpowered weapons to people to need them, and have a strong-typed normal battle."
• Not always good in the eyes of, say, the developer, who wants ROBLOXians to purchase overpowered weapons.
"However, you can always be annoyed by one."
• You don't say?
"Anti-exploits could sometimes be decoded by Inspect Element, and hackers would continue reeking upon ROBLOX."
• What? You mean exploiters can use Inspect Element to look at a game's workspace...?
"This is also a kids game. Why would children need to know about hacking?"
• Because they whine about an FPS being unfair, they Google "ROBLOX game hacks" and exploit a game, all the while laughing at everyone who is cursing them.
"It gives viruses to their computer, and it makes parents poor."
• What? [2]
• What? [3]
• Both of these statements are wrong.
"That's the problem here. I have seen several thousands of dollars go to waste on new computers over the past few weeks. This is because of the infamous device known as the Cheat Engine."
• Cheat Engine does not cost money, and does not implant viruses into computers. Get your facts straight.
"To me, several cheat engines have some type of a virus that corrupts your computer in choice to find out secret commands that are not revealed to the public, and this has happened on different games, too."
• What? [4]
• So Microsoft has given their computers admin commands?
"Hackers aren't really banned or anything after they ruin up a game, which makes it totally no fun for a really fun game."
• You literally just said that exploiting is for added fun. [2]
• It is hard to catch exploiters, especially since most of them use their alternative accounts, and it requires evidence. Moderators simply do not have the time to sift through this.
"My friend, markthesuperboy, being himself, is a hacker."
• Personal attack (in a sense)
• And?
"However, he only uses it for fun purposes, but sometimes to me I think its wrong, and I sometimes imagine why hacking was invented, and what could stop it on several sites?"
• You literally just said that exploiting is used for added fun. [3]
• You said that exploiting for fun was a good thing.
• Hacking was invented for military purposes, I would imagine.
• Gee, none of us wonder how to stop hacking. Thanks for being the only one who ever tried to stop hacking! [Blatant sarcasm is blatant.]
"I would dream about what it would be like if I was a hacker, and I see ROBLOX comments being 'Too many hackers, crappy game.' and stuff like that." >Good for you [3]
"I think ROBLOX would have a terrible future in front of them because of hacking. This could lead to a possible shutdown."
• I doubt ROBLOX would shut down.
• Just because the minority of ROBLOXians exploit does not mean ROBLOX will be beaten bloody by a six-year-old who wants to walk thru a virtual wall.
"ROBLOX should not be shut down."
• You don't say? [2]
"It should remain a fun game over the years, with tons of new ideas to come in the future."
• You don't say? [3]
"Hacking has to come to a stop!"
• You don't say? [4]
• IMPOSSIBRU
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Systems
REGENERATION
"You know when you would want to continue your game after it is ruined, because you've worked hard on it?"
• Because there has been even once instance in ROBLOX history where a single exploiter on a single server did any substantial damage to the entire game.
"The owner could be informed if online, or possibly be E-Mail'ed about it."
• How would this help, if the owner already knows about the exploiting?
• This would require ROBLOX knowing that the game has been exploited. If they had this omniscient intuitive insight, there would be no exploiting.
"Then, with a several processing notices, there could be an option to recover the server, without losing data. It would warn the users, reload the server, and have them right off where they were."
• So a glorified version of a server shut down?
"The only con I could see to this is that the hackers would perform it on the same server again and again."
• "Hackers hack more than once." You don't say? [5]
"However, I cannot think of a Pro to it. This could lead to very disturbed gameplay, since the process takes a few minutes."
• Great statistical knowledge you got there.
• If the cons outweigh the pros, why are you even posting this thread?
"This could combine with anti-exploits, because if someone breaks the barrier, the developer would know."
• How so?
"This idea is because of hacked servers on games like 2 Player Gun Factory Tycoon by berezaa, and possibly others."
• Good job. You took a great mental step by discovering and acknowledging the fact that popular games do get exploited.
ANTI-EXPLOIT
"This plan may successfully work to get rid of hackers on a server."
• Said ROBLOX and Developers on every anti-exploit update, ever. Exploiters will always find a new way to breach security.
"To process, an AI exploiter that uses tools for good and eliminate hackers would come to the server, and alerting players thirty seconds earlier."
• What? [5] What? [6] What? [7]
• If ROBLOX and Developers cannot successfully identify every anti-exploit on the server, what makes you think that they can script and AI that can?
• How do you know the AI will not be exploited?
"After process, the user would be banned for the game for several days and could not hack there for a while. It would be like a security system, but possibly more brutal."
• As if this does not already happen when an exploiter is caught
"However, an alternate plan for this function is having a team of anti-exploiters could differ from every game to check it out."
• So volunteer moderators?
"It would warn them what server they were in, and stay in a corner of their screen. It could show players, for easy access, and names, and also to see if it is full or not."
• What? [8]
THREAT
"You know that idiot threatens you that he'll hack your account for nothing? Well, the user could get a warning that he could excuse himself or get kicked."
• >Report abuse
"This is commonly used for trolling, and trolling is annoying towards me, and it makes me angry due to autistic emotions."
• You don't say? [6]
• I did not know that emotions could be autistic. We must raise awareness by dumping buckets of hot lava on us.
"This may not anger other people, but towards young children, it's frightening."
• >Nice statistical knowledge you got there. [2]
Usually, when I am in a server, and a person if posting threats like that, it goes like this:
FakeHacker: "OMG YOU ####### #### I WILL #### YOUR ####### AND TAKE ALL YOUR ROBUX"
Noob11111123: "haha shut uo you idiot you shove your moues up yuor nose" *Kills FakeHacker*
FakeHacker: "YOU ####### NOOB STOP KILLING ME I AM NOT JK I WILL LEAVE THIS GAME AND HACK YO"
Noob2323: "omg guise stop fighting this is like roblox we should love eacho hter guise plz"
Noob11111123: "dei b*ch" *Kills FakeHacker*
FakeHacker: "ynkpprtmbwrbr'tb'lqet'b;e;bt'le'r;'br;le;bl;re'b;lrl''lr'fsdlbrll;rtl;"
FakeHacker: "rodgoergoersg're;'"
FakeHacker: "fgb"
Noob2323: "pls stahp spamming"
FakeHacker: "rwgwrpgwpmppwm"
Noob11111123: "aww baby spamming, baby wanna hug from mommy who i ###### last night hahahh"
FakeHacker: *Kills Noob11111123*
Noob11111123: "NO U HACKERS I SHOT U IN FACE HOW ####### HOW U USE AIMBOT YOU #### #### ######## ## # # ## "
FakeHacker: "YES! YES! HAHHAHH I KILLE DYOU YOU SUCK JUST LIKE YOU MOM DID HAHA NOOB"
Noob11111123: *kills FakeHacker*
Do you get the point? Usually a person is not believed when they rant above hacking an account.
"This could give the user a in-game penalty, disabling him from doing actions in the game for five minutes or so, only being able to spectate."
• Could ruin games
• How does the game know when a person exploits / trolls?
"In my opinion, this could be a new kind of report system, since it takes a while for the user to get a punishment."
• Haz idea: "let's replace an already bad system with an even worse system because it will improve games and roblox"
....No.
• What? [9]
LIFE
"You're getting loopkilled, without a way to survive." >Good for you [4]
"This is annoying to various users, and if you're trying to get a combat badge like Bloxxer, and you've got lots of data, the developer/owner of the game could enable or disable certain commands, which prevents them from abusing."
• *All users
• If you are trying to get a badge, just leave the game before you get loop-killed too much.
• How does disabling a game's command stop the exploitation of them?
"It would give the user a message 'Due to the developer's choice, you cannot use this command.'. If continued, like THREAT, it could give the user a permanent spectating."
• What? [10]
• If what is continued?
• Permanent spectating? What? [11] What? [12]
VERIFICATIONAL PUNISHMENT
"Without verification, I think the user could not be able to hack, and forced to use a parent's E-Mail."
• If ROBLOX and Developers had the omniscient intuitive insight to detect exploitation, there would be not exploits. [2]
"If so, when the user has hacked, the parent would be sent a message saying that 'This user has hacked the following game : (GameHere). Would you like to give a 3-Day ban?'"
• How would this help?
"and it could give an option. This prevents the user from future hacking, and watching out for young ones."
• What? [13]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Thoughts
"I must tell you for one thing that ROBLOX is a bit of a hacking magnet, with very few (Around 2,500) hackers on ROBLOX."
• Nice statistical knowledge you got there. [3]
• >Says that ROBLOX is a hotspot for hacking. >Immediate after that proclaims that ROBLOX has a very small amount of hackers.
• What? [14]
"With reekers everywhere, and scriptable things, we could up our security with these ideas, preventing users to
constantly ruin gameplay."
• What do you mean scriptable things?
"Children should not be victims to this spreading disease. Support this in the name of safety of ROBLOX."
• What? [15]
• Now we are talking about diseases?
No support.
Also, WNTS, because you never stated loud and clear, except for one sub-idea, how to stop exploiting.
Tl;DR
Get out, this post is more flawed that the United States Welfare system.
>I will rip out your duodenum |