jjblox26Join Date: 2012-09-29
Post Count: 4941 |
now before i get little kids screaing at me "ZOMG ALL PLACES WOULD BE UNCOPYLOCKED THEN!" i never said make all places uncopylocked> i said to add a button near the "play button" called the solo mode button. this lets pepole choese if the want to play any place in solo or mutiplayer mode, and here is whats good about it
.pepole can play apocalypse rising in solo mode without worrying about exploiters
.famous place owners can test out there place alone with out the worry of stalkers
so what do you guys think?
support? thanks it helps alot
no support? please give critizsim about why it would eb a bad idea |
|
xlfJoin Date: 2010-06-17
Post Count: 980 |
No. If the creator(s) had wished to design their game so it'd be single-player, they would've limited the server quantity to 1. That's their sole decision; Roblox has no right to interfere with that. |
|
dustbiteJoin Date: 2014-08-22
Post Count: 178 |
@xlf
The minimum server quantity is 6... |
|
|
you're always suggesting this. |
|
xlfJoin Date: 2010-06-17
Post Count: 980 |
|
|
dustbiteJoin Date: 2014-08-22
Post Count: 178 |
@xlf
Either it's BC only or it's changed since they added the new developer page. So, yeah. |
|
xlfJoin Date: 2010-06-17
Post Count: 980 |
"Either it's BC only or it's changed since they added the new developer page. So, yeah."
It's not BC-restricted.
My argument still stands. |
|
VirtusIIJoin Date: 2011-01-25
Post Count: 988 |
Support
d-_-b - Stay Frosty |
|
jjblox26Join Date: 2012-09-29
Post Count: 4941 |
@XLF i said it was a choice for the player. so that way the creator wont worry about th place haivng to be uncopylocked |
|
xlfJoin Date: 2010-06-17
Post Count: 980 |
"i said it was a choice for the player. so that way the creator wont worry about th place haivng to be uncopylocked"
Yes, and I'm arguing that it isn't the player's--or ROBLOX's--place to determine if a game that isn't their own have a customary single-player option. Let the creator choose. |
|
zeeky9Join Date: 2010-03-12
Post Count: 7219 |
i hat how you spam this thread 24-7 seriously, its getting annoying, well atleast you dont have caps lock on |
|
jjblox26Join Date: 2012-09-29
Post Count: 4941 |
@cmark1 i do it to gte a mod to notice this |
|
jjblox26Join Date: 2012-09-29
Post Count: 4941 |
@xlf NO IT SHOULDNT BE THE CREATORS CHOICE WHY CAUSE IAM TIRED OF PLAYING WIHT EXPLOITERS IN APOC BUT GUS WONT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT SO WHY SHOULD IT BE THE CREATORS CHOICE |
|
zeeky9Join Date: 2010-03-12
Post Count: 7219 |
@jjblox they sure do notice it |
|
|
Why would you want to play Apoc in single player? Just calm down, drink ajuice box, and change servers. |
|
jjblox26Join Date: 2012-09-29
Post Count: 4941 |
@cold BECAUSE EVEYR SERVER I GO TO IN APOC HAS EXPLOITERS |
|
jjblox26Join Date: 2012-09-29
Post Count: 4941 |
@xlf and plus roblox mods own the site> they can do want they want |
|
|
jjblox26Join Date: 2012-09-29
Post Count: 4941 |
hello |
|
|
Many games run on the ability to have multiple people.
You going to Sword Fight on the Heights solo?
Apoc Rising has some badges that can only be obtained with other people. Like the ones that require you to KILL people.
In general, no support. |
|
jjblox26Join Date: 2012-09-29
Post Count: 4941 |
@tz I SAID IT WAS ACHOICE YOU DUMMY! DID YOU EVEN READ THE WHOLE FOURM!? |
|
SulfoneJoin Date: 2010-08-19
Post Count: 8046 |
I'll quote what I said on a similar thread:
"Just have the game owner make it a 1-player game. If the game isn't supposed to be played with several people, it would be that or have some sort of single-payer mode (using universes)." |
|
jjblox26Join Date: 2012-09-29
Post Count: 4941 |
@roblox THEN THEIR WOULDNT BE ANY MUTIPLAYER MODE> SO THATS WHY IAM SUGGESTING TO AMKE A BUTTON ALLOWING YANY PLAYER TO PLAY ANY PLACE IN SOLO MODE. g0d you big dummy |
|
xlfJoin Date: 2010-06-17
Post Count: 980 |
jjblox, are you daft? We're saying no the the publicly-enforced choice. I don't care if the games are run on the ROBLOX platform, the creators should have absolute control over the player limit of their servers.
I don't care if you're irate that someone killed you in Apocalypse Rising or whatever; the fact still stands that it should be to the sole discretion of the creator of said game to determine whether or not their game is apt for a single-player function or a multi-player function. |
|
|
Support
This would be an AWESOME feature for the "serious" players who don't like noobs, idiots, and trolls in their game. There are times that I won't even TRY playing games with people because I know that idiots will ruin it for me (*cough cough* Roblox High School *cough*). And it's really hard to have a decent conversation without having it buried in the chat log by a flame war and gibberish. When I started playing Roblox back in 2009, I was too scared to talk to anybody, and just HEARING what people said made me quit playing all together. Now I'm back, with a little courage and better social skills... and I hate the players even more. If I'd had a Solo Mode option in 2009, I never would have left.
And if I have a Solo Mode soon in an update, I probably won't be driven away.
Also, this DOES NOT have to be REQUIRED for EVERY game! There are games that NEED other players (EX: War games, team-based games, two-player tycoon games, ect), and having a Solo Mode would be useless. This is why there should be some kind of check box for the CREATOR to click if they feel that a Solo Mode could be useful. The creator of the game knows very well if the game would need a Solo Mode or not. And if it has one and it is still a team-based game of some sort, then you DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT! Solo Mode is an OPTION, whether or not it is actually needed for a particular game.
So yeah... Solo Mode would be nice. :) |
|