of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

Dharma3
#14761532Monday, September 28, 2009 9:58 PM GMT

Countries, every country in the world WANTS and I will say this again WANTS a nuke! The resaon why is because a nukular missile is a symbol of national pride. 100 years ago a battleship was a symol or national pride. Today, if you want to be a "great" country all you seem to need is a NUKE! The end :)
patsfan07
#14761630Monday, September 28, 2009 9:59 PM GMT

They want a nuke so they can threaten people with it. MAD does many things.
OrcSlayer9
#14762276Monday, September 28, 2009 10:11 PM GMT

You stole my thread that i didnt do today If i could i would sue you!!!
dude33333
#14762947Monday, September 28, 2009 10:21 PM GMT

What about an H-bomb?
Kronos115
#14764771Monday, September 28, 2009 10:49 PM GMT

Or a Neutron bomb, that'd be just as bad.
Dharma3
#14767436Monday, September 28, 2009 11:35 PM GMT

-_- They are the same thing, they just work defferently THEY BOTH MAKE A BIG BOOM1
dude33333
#14767534Monday, September 28, 2009 11:37 PM GMT

Neutron bombs are perfect for taking over cities, cause they kill people but don't destroy buildings.
dude33333
#14767570Monday, September 28, 2009 11:38 PM GMT

H-bombs are about 100 times more powerful than nukes. Go figure.
BioIron
#14767951Monday, September 28, 2009 11:45 PM GMT

Canada doesnt want a nuke, yet we could make plenty. Why? because you dont belive in war as a main way to slove conflitcs, others, such as United States · Russia United Kingdom · France China · India · Israel Pakistan · North Korea South Africa · Iran Intresting list?
BioIron
#14768006Monday, September 28, 2009 11:46 PM GMT

wrong dude, It would topel MANY buildings, a Biological bomb could suffice
Dharma3
#14768246Monday, September 28, 2009 11:51 PM GMT

Canadia dose not go to war because they only country around you is the USA. And your people know we can pwn you in war.
Kronos115
#14768331Monday, September 28, 2009 11:52 PM GMT

Well, what about an E-Bomb, or like an EMP, fries all Electronics!
BioIron
#14768458Monday, September 28, 2009 11:54 PM GMT

So? being far away doesnt mean you cant fight a war. We are already in afganistan. BTW, Canada could win a war with US, if it was us being invaded
BioIron
#14768499Monday, September 28, 2009 11:55 PM GMT

the EMP bomb is simply a nuke without skin firising radiation and explosions
BioIron
#14768619Monday, September 28, 2009 11:57 PM GMT

I mean firing
dude33333
#14769056Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:04 AM GMT

Well, yes...a neutron would topple weak buildings, but not all buildings...
BioIron
#14769690Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:14 AM GMT

Then why not save TIME AND MOENY and use a biological weapon?
OrcSlayer9
#14770002Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:20 AM GMT

biological weapon would not level building but possible damage the population more. Biological weapons are against the Geneva Conference though.
BioIron
#14770451Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:27 AM GMT

So are N-bombs
OrcSlayer9
#14770518Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:28 AM GMT

true.
BioIron
#14770614Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:30 AM GMT

So my point is, its better to use a bio bomb.
OrcSlayer9
#14770723Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:31 AM GMT

back to topic, most nations have nukes to scare there no nukes neighbors.
BioIron
#14771661Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:49 AM GMT

Then why deos Usa have nukes?
Hihibob
#14772215Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:59 AM GMT

The age of battleships have ended. Now wars at sea are fought by aircraft carriers. The USA has the most in the world with 11. The second most are 2 which are owned by Britain. All the other countries that have them have 1 and not that many countries do.
dude33333
#14773849Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:30 AM GMT

USA promised not to use nukes, but the tech is there.

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right