of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

SmokingTheReefer
#147802930Sunday, October 12, 2014 12:49 PM GMT

This should prove Roger is the best in game, even today. Not only did he get by Djokovic without much trouble, he won a big Masters 1000 tournament and continues to climb the rankings. All while Nadal has an awful year.
xtomtom75
#147806162Sunday, October 12, 2014 2:18 PM GMT

Fed is the best tennis player of all time <333
xtomtom75
#147806180Sunday, October 12, 2014 2:19 PM GMT

Raonic and bouchard own almost everyone when they're at their best <333
BMLGUY
#147806191Sunday, October 12, 2014 2:19 PM GMT

WOw. Hey Did You KNow That LiterAly NoBODy On THiS FOruM CarS ABout TeNniS??? This is my siggy. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
SmokingTheReefer
#147807464Sunday, October 12, 2014 2:50 PM GMT

Ranoic couldn't beat Fed lol
xtomtom75
#147843563Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:04 PM GMT

Ik, but he almost beat djokovic few times. And he will be a top 10 for few years. BML, me and icy love tennis. so GG.
padam11
#147843694Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:06 PM GMT

one year he is up in the rankings and he's the best in the game? "A lion doesn't concern himself with the opinions of a sheep." - Tywin Lannister | Former 12'er
SmokingTheReefer
#147843935Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:09 PM GMT

^clearly doesnt watch tennis activly
xtomtom75
#147843957Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:09 PM GMT

I didn't see he's the best, I said he can almost beat everyone (except people like nadal, fed, and djoko.) but he will stay in the top 10 for few years I think. And pospisil will be to watch, if he gets a little better.
padam11
#147844071Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:11 PM GMT

icy, you said that "this should prove roger is the best in the game", and you said because he went up in the rankings and won a masters 1000. "A lion doesn't concern himself with the opinions of a sheep." - Tywin Lannister | Former 12'er
SmokingTheReefer
#147844088Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:11 PM GMT

I meant padam, I know you watch tennis.
xtomtom75
#147844154Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:12 PM GMT

rofl. He has a good ranking since 2002... He's clearly the best in term of skills (look his trick shots on YT, like the tweener) and he's one of the best player, if not the best, in modern tennis history.
SmokingTheReefer
#147844165Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:12 PM GMT

AND he has been thew only consistent player on the tour. This isn't all of the reason. Do your research before posting about a topic you clearly have sub-par knowledge in.
xtomtom75
#147844311Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:14 PM GMT

fed ftw lol. He went down to 7th, but now he is 2nd and will stay for like a year.
padam11
#147844379Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:15 PM GMT

he's actually 3rd behind novak and nadal. "A lion doesn't concern himself with the opinions of a sheep." - Tywin Lannister | Former 12'er
SmokingTheReefer
#147844389Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:15 PM GMT

He will go up to one and stay there for 2 years :)
padam11
#147844413Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:16 PM GMT

no he wont "A lion doesn't concern himself with the opinions of a sheep." - Tywin Lannister | Former 12'er
SmokingTheReefer
#147844429Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:16 PM GMT

Proof padam knows nothing about tennis, after today when the rankings are posted tomorrow he will be #2. There is my proof he is just looking stiff up on the computer.
xtomtom75
#147844438Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:16 PM GMT

padam, by winning shangai, he is now 2nd. Well tommorow he will be ranked 2nd. So yea. Learn ur facts -..-
padam11
#147844513Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:17 PM GMT

novak > federer "A lion doesn't concern himself with the opinions of a sheep." - Tywin Lannister | Former 12'er
SmokingTheReefer
#147844525Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:17 PM GMT

Good job snipe, we proved padam was looking stuff up and knows nothing.
SmokingTheReefer
#147844584Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:18 PM GMT

And Padam, 2 days ago Federer beat Novak pretty badly, lol.
SmokingTheReefer
#147844648Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:19 PM GMT

#owned
padam11
#147844751Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:21 PM GMT

yes because 1 game domination = federer is better also, nadal always beats federer when they play against each other, 23-10. "A lion doesn't concern himself with the opinions of a sheep." - Tywin Lannister | Former 12'er
SmokingTheReefer
#147844990Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:24 PM GMT

Yes but that is the only thing Nadal has on Federer. 17 Slams > 14 slams 302 weeks at #1 > 141 weeks at #1 237 consecutive weeks at #1 > 56 consecutive weeks at #1 6 ATP World Tour Finals wins > 0 ATP World Tour Finals Wins 4 year end number 1 > 3 year end number 1

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right