of     1   

AX94
#148796959Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:08 PM GMT

I think TrussParts should be union-able. What do you guys think? I knoweth thee wanteth what's on mine mind, I knoweth thee like what's on mine mind, I knoweth t consumeth thee up inside! I knoweth, thee knoweth, thee knoweth, thee knoweth!
AX94
#148817503Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:33 PM GMT

Bump I knoweth thee wanteth what's on mine mind, I knoweth thee like what's on mine mind, I knoweth t consumeth thee up inside! I knoweth, thee knoweth, thee knoweth, thee knoweth!
AX94
#148820328Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:18 PM GMT

Gonna bump this until someone responds.
ElectrifiedAssassin
#148820977Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:29 PM GMT

um that would be pointless nobody builds structures with trussparts ᕦ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ᕤ rip le b1tsh1ftᕦ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ᕤ
AX94
#148821390Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:37 PM GMT

It would not be pointless.. it would allow for unclimbable truss designs and fences without using too many parts.
ElectrifiedAssassin
#148822868Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:00 AM GMT

well trussparts arent meant to be union. since trustbars are stamper, they cant be edited with c-frame data, etc. ᕦ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ᕤ rip le b1tsh1ftᕦ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ᕤ
Udoxas
#148823125Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:04 AM GMT

truss parts weren't made for stamper, they were just put in stamper and they can be edited like a regular part... Error 404 - Siggy Not Found
ElectrifiedAssassin
#148828460Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:22 AM GMT

indeed but there not meant for unions, or designing there meant for basic climbing ᕦ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ᕤ rip le b1tsh1ftᕦ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ᕤ
GenericallyNamed
#148829047Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:30 AM GMT

So what? If they are made for climbing, their used for climbing! If they aren't and are just for decorations and making cool designs, then the are for decoration and making cool designs!
filiptibell
#148829490Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:36 AM GMT

The problem is the complex mesh/ amount of vertices of a truss; it would be hard to implement, and if implemented, not many people would even use the feature. It's simply not worth it. ~The herp lerped a derp~
AX94
#148835632Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:20 AM GMT

"The problem is the complex mesh/ amount of vertices of a truss; it would be hard to implement, and if implemented, not many people would even use the feature. It's simply not worth it." That's true, I hadn't thought about that. Still, it'd be damn nice to have. I knoweth thee wanteth what's on mine mind, I knoweth thee like what's on mine mind, I knoweth t consumeth thee up inside! I knoweth, thee knoweth, thee knoweth, thee knoweth!
DerProgrammierer
#148837326Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:56 AM GMT

"The problem is the complex mesh/ amount of vertices of a truss; it would be hard to implement, and if implemented, not many people would even use the feature. It's simply not worth it." It's a square for the most part. It wouldn't be must different than a brick, or a thousand bricks.
AX94
#148838990Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:58 AM GMT

Also true, DerProgrammierer. It's really just a climbable mesh, not like it's actually hollow or anything like that. I knoweth thee wanteth what's on mine mind, I knoweth thee like what's on mine mind, I knoweth t consumeth thee up inside! I knoweth, thee knoweth, thee knoweth, thee knoweth!

    of     1