of     1   

shikaro510
#155553943Sunday, February 08, 2015 7:26 AM GMT

Example the is group pm'ing and add more options I let the people decide to messaging
Combustage
#155553975Sunday, February 08, 2015 7:27 AM GMT

I could see this as something I support. But, wouldn't it be the same as party chats?
shikaro510
#155556501Sunday, February 08, 2015 8:55 AM GMT

It may be similar dear user, But it's not. In group you can send messages to people who are in the group, This one can be sended even if he/she isn't in the group and is offline.
SirGordonBrown
#155556661Sunday, February 08, 2015 9:02 AM GMT

Support. ~Now get out.
shikaro510
#155556748Sunday, February 08, 2015 9:06 AM GMT

Bump.
SirGordonBrown
#155556851Sunday, February 08, 2015 9:11 AM GMT

Free Bump. Now get out.
shikaro510
#155601472Sunday, February 08, 2015 11:26 PM GMT

Bump
Blackstride
#155601886Sunday, February 08, 2015 11:31 PM GMT

Support, maybe tag messaging. You can attach multiple names to one message. In the "To" bar it would say To: Player1, Player2, etc.
shikaro510
#155602197Sunday, February 08, 2015 11:35 PM GMT

And being able to put emoticons and attachments
shikaro510
#155602332Sunday, February 08, 2015 11:37 PM GMT

Bump
Blackstride
#155604773Monday, February 09, 2015 12:10 AM GMT

@shikaro A little too far e_e this isn't Outlook.
shikaro510
#155606084Monday, February 09, 2015 12:30 AM GMT

Alright I think your suggestion will do then
sxbrina
#155606211Monday, February 09, 2015 12:32 AM GMT

This could be abused and used as spam.
stickpick123
#155607991Monday, February 09, 2015 12:55 AM GMT

Like mass pm'ing for a group? Incase of raids and wars maybe
shikaro510
#155620925Monday, February 09, 2015 4:06 AM GMT

@stick could be. @ others it's a freewill everyone can do what they want to do

    of     1