|
set up a fb
if vak wins you all get to play in varcia
if void wins vak is forced to raid labs
????????????????????????????????????????????????? |
|
RaethyrJoin Date: 2008-03-08 Post Count: 20527 |
[ Content Deleted ] |
|
|
rae shhhhhhhh
fkin shhhhhhhhhhhhh
i'm trying to make you guys have a war don't fkin ruin it |
|
|
support this for a good war where you'll have popcorn and watch flame wars pop up every 10 seconds
come on guys it's great!!!!!!!!!! |
|
RaethyrJoin Date: 2008-03-08 Post Count: 20527 |
[ Content Deleted ] |
|
|
|
FlammavirJoin Date: 2010-01-28 Post Count: 18607 |
but isn't it really all against us
i mean labs is unfair for vak
and varcia is fair on both sides
so win or lose, void doesn't lose much
SALAM. |
|
|
'so win or lose, void doesn't lose much"
from what i've seen, iso is stubborn and doesn't want to drop labs
this is something to encourage him and to put each clan's fb team to the test
|
|
ZanziberJoin Date: 2008-12-08 Post Count: 5088 |
VAK already suggested this but VOID declined- too fair for them, why fight for a win and risk losing, when you can just claim an autowin? |
|
ZapoleanJoin Date: 2012-04-05 Post Count: 9217 |
why should we accept the war when they checked out our base before the war and said it was ok
zap zap |
|
ZanziberJoin Date: 2008-12-08 Post Count: 5088 |
because you want to find who the real winner is and not just win by squabbles |
|
underbookJoin Date: 2010-03-16 Post Count: 11592 |
smo isnt the fairest base out there either, and somehow void gets wins there yet vak complains about labs. i dont get it.
~LE |
|
|
i'd say just do it. if >*NFC*< can do well against VAK at Varcia, V O I D can smash them.
but this is honestly a good idea. sigh. |
|
OppiusJoin Date: 2012-01-15 Post Count: 7731 |
"VAK already suggested this but VOID declined- too fair for them, why fight for a win and risk losing, when you can just claim an autowin?"
+ SMO is more fair than LABs.
|
|
|
|
|