of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

martinluther123
#15851796Sunday, October 25, 2009 7:23 PM GMT

should we end the war or let more american soldiers die in the heat of the iraq sun or be tortured to death or get blown up by bombs and shot by ak47s? this has been a thread by martinluther123 thank you
patsfan07
#15856329Sunday, October 25, 2009 8:51 PM GMT

You obviously think we should leave. I am not sure what we should do. On one hand if the Iraqi government has become capable enough to control the area we should leave. If not we should stay.
meatbridge1
#15857273Sunday, October 25, 2009 9:09 PM GMT

Yes. Nah, I don't really care to elaborate.
rapscallion945
#15863009Sunday, October 25, 2009 10:47 PM GMT

That Iraqis seem to be under control. We should leave.
TheSquirrel
#15864410Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:08 PM GMT

More Iraqi innocent have died than American soldiers. The Iraq war was started because of oil. A despicable reason. No one should ever have invaded and everyone should get out now.
son54123
#15865314Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:22 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
TheSquirrel
#15865539Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:26 PM GMT

There are still soldiers in Iraq, so it doesn't really matter if it's technically a war or not. And don't give me that crap about Saddam Hussein and "weapons of mass destruction". If that were the case, you would be on Zimbabwe like flies to honey.
prokiller2
#15865596Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:27 PM GMT

Wasn't it about finding al queda and taking the tablian out.
TheSquirrel
#15866319Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:38 PM GMT

The Taliban are in Afghanistan.
patsfan07
#15866585Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:41 PM GMT

The Taliban are also in Iraq. The number of innocents killed is highly exaggerated because most people that are terrorists are considered civilians. That means that most non innocent deaths count as civilian deaths. YOu just interchanged the word civilian with innocent.
son54123
#15866875Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:46 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
TheSquirrel
#15866889Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:46 PM GMT

So I suppose that the 100 000 dead civilians deserved to die because they were all packing AK-47s in their houses.
TheSquirrel
#15866977Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:47 PM GMT

@son The F-16 is an extremely versatile fighter and can be equipped with all manor of weapons, including bombs.
meatbridge1
#15866997Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:48 PM GMT

Twice as many people die of peanut allergies a year than terrorism.
son54123
#15867041Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:48 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
patsfan07
#15867049Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:48 PM GMT

US combat regulations are too strict. US soldiers have died because they didn't kill a questionable civilian.
son54123
#15867079Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:49 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
meatbridge1
#15867098Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:49 PM GMT

There would be so much peace in the world if we just nuked everyone that wasn't in the U.S. military.
patsfan07
#15867123Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:49 PM GMT

More people die from the flu yearly than fighting in Iraq.
son54123
#15867194Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:50 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Peppsi101
#15867231Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:51 PM GMT

I agree with patsfan, TS this is hwta I was trying to explain to you, before you overreacted when I said "Most of those innocent civilians aren't that innocent".
meatbridge1
#15867268Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:51 PM GMT

I was joking. How bout if I said du bullets instead?
patsfan07
#15867303Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:52 PM GMT

ALso many of the civilian deaths are caused by IEDs from terrorists.
son54123
#15867334Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:52 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
martinluther123
#15871968Monday, October 26, 2009 1:04 AM GMT

i agree with patsman07 becuase we are infected and iraq will have 2/4 of population in 10 years this has been a post by martinluther123

    of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right