0_0Join Date: 2010-08-15
Post Count: 1197 |
I propose a gr8 8/8 system to b8n h4xers.
This idea Is kind of similar to how OverWatch is done in Counterstrike, and it's proven to not ban innocent players and catch cheaters.
Only players that have a 13+ account, have been a member for more than 3 years, not banned from overwatch, have no recent moderation history and have builders club get given a sort of "overwatch download file" where they can watch a player that was reported by more than around 5 players in a short time frame(5 mins?)in on a player and spectate him. They have to spectate him for around 5-10 minutes and at the end of the spectate they're given 5 R$? This could be abused with people clicking the overwatch button and going AFK so to make sure that don't happen, the overwatch money is "pending" for 3 days and you only get the money if the player was suspected in cheating and you can get thrown out of the overwatch program if what you specified wasn't even close to what the player was doing (for example if he the player was hacking and you said he wasn't to like 3 overwatches but the majority of players did, you would be given a timeout from overwatch and your money will be denied. I think this is a good system in place because It allows players to get R$ while keeping the bad players away.
I could probably add onto this more and explain it better but the mods will probably never read this thread so I'm not going to spend longer than 10 minutes on this post :P
Feel free to add onto it though if you can spare the time and if you want, describe how Overwatch is done on counterstrike. |
|
0_0Join Date: 2010-08-15
Post Count: 1197 |
Wow, I should of done paragraphs and added a tl;dr but the moderators will probably never see this anyway so meh ;p |
|
|
How would moderators know that they are telling the truth about the said exploiter? |
|
ExirtJoin Date: 2010-10-07
Post Count: 4580 |
No support.
This can be very bad.
1. How do we know the player is trustworthy? The amount of bans does not make them trustworthy?
2. The majority of people have been warned and banned once. It would be super hard to find a person that did not get banned.
3. The majority of people that have not gotten banned or warned for 3 years are inactive. They can't do the job.
4. It would be very inefficient and slow.
5.Reports are caused by 9 year olds mad at people who are raging at the game. Imagine watching a person for no reason!
6. The robux reward does nothing.
7. Although Counter Strike did it efficiently, the ROBLOX Community and moderators are so bad, they just can't do it. You need a trustworthy community to do this.
0/10 would not suggest. not even the reward could save this one |
|
0_0Join Date: 2010-08-15
Post Count: 1197 |
1) Well, they
2) I said recent moderation history (within 3 months or so)
3) ^
4) Propose a more efficient idea then :P
5) Well if you watched a player and he did nothing wrong then if the majority of players said he did nothing wrong then nothing will be done to the player and you'll be given 5R$ still.
6) What do you mean the robux reward does nothing? You get 5 R$? for only watching someone 10 mins while doing w/e you want :P
7) That's true, but a single player will probably be watched from around 500+ players on overwatch and I'm pretty sure the majority of the players will do it correctly and if they don't then they'll get kicked from the overwatch system. |
|
0_0Join Date: 2010-08-15
Post Count: 1197 |
Woops forgot to fill out the first one lol
1) "Only players that have a 13+ account, have been a member for more than 3 years, not banned from overwatch, have no recent moderation history and have builders club"
The player has a 13+ account so It's probably not some 9 year old rager, they've been a member for more than 3 years so they're not just some alt account trolling, no moderation history within 3 months so they haven't been up to no good recently and have builders club (to prevent alts from messing around with the overwatch system). |
|
|
You have gotta be joking... No support. The report system is not a rewarding system, and could be easily exploitable if it was that way.
alfalfa | R$45 |
|
ExirtJoin Date: 2010-10-07
Post Count: 4580 |
@king
People fake their age in ROBLOX. Did you know that? |
|
BloxksJoin Date: 2013-12-03
Post Count: 1631 |
yeah im going to download a backdoor virus from roblox |
|
|
|
L( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)_{
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
lenny centipede supports too. |
|
QefoJoin Date: 2014-01-25
Post Count: 399 |
You need to show the Admins proof. |
|
0_0Join Date: 2010-08-15
Post Count: 1197 |
Yeah, people fake their age but most 9 year olds are probably not intelligent enough to not put their real age and a lot of parents moderate over what a 9 year old would do online so they might create their account for them and not lie about their age. |
|
nova981Join Date: 2012-09-15
Post Count: 6274 |
Exploiters* |
|
0_0Join Date: 2010-08-15
Post Count: 1197 |
Oh yeah, exploiters. Whatever lel :P |
|
|
Support, but pretty much all 3-yearers have some moderation history.
:^) everyday |
|
0_0Join Date: 2010-08-15
Post Count: 1197 |
^
That's true but that's why I said moderation history within 3 months :')
|
|
|
So it's like counter strike overwatch system but without a group of other overwatches?
[Apieceofabrick120 riplol] [ https://twitter.com/Apieceofabrick/status/543975042736848897 ] |
|
0_0Join Date: 2010-08-15
Post Count: 1197 |
Well 500+ would have to review a certain player for 10 minutes that's a suspect of exploiting and if the majority vote to ban the exploiter then he'll be banned ;P If the majority said the suspected player wasn't exploiting but someone in the overwatch said that the suspected player was exploiting then he/she would be given 2 more chances and if they run out of chances, they'll be kicked out of the overwatch program for at least 3 months, this is to prevent players from overwatching a player and then going AFK and getting a bot or something to vote for them. |
|
pyvzJoin Date: 2012-05-05
Post Count: 70823 |
No support... |
|