|
|
NickyJ3Join Date: 2011-12-23 Post Count: 3563 |
It takes 2 to have an alliance.
You cannot solely blame one side.
Just my opinion. |
|
TriedenJoin Date: 2011-11-01 Post Count: 7503 |
ye |
|
LetsBetJoin Date: 2010-07-24 Post Count: 7043 |
ehh who cares it was eventually gonna happen
|
|
|
RilievoIVJoin Date: 2012-02-20 Post Count: 166 |
nice. |
|
CrixianXJoin Date: 2014-03-01 Post Count: 5198 |
FEAR is bad, good choice.
-Unknown |
|
|
testmef00Join Date: 2011-08-14 Post Count: 732 |
so you ask for help >one time< and it goes unanswered and you respond by alliance termination
apparently you were raised a spoiled bigot. |
|
|
well sorry dude i just hope we don't go to ###. |
|
|
shraugerJoin Date: 2011-11-08 Post Count: 10573 |
Wait what was I doing a week ago... |
|
|
FEAR never helped anyone, lmao. |
|
shraugerJoin Date: 2011-11-08 Post Count: 10573 |
Your going to still accept our help correct? |
|
|
Please reconsider. As Dertexz was saying we weren't able to launch the raid. We have some rule sets that aren't always the best in every situation. |
|
|
|
My question is, why did you even ally them in the first place? Good choice to unally them though. |
|
|
Sonic: *exiles all HRs*
The Zentinel Legion | Interfice illos in viis nostris. |
|
beloxyJoin Date: 2010-08-14 Post Count: 2800 |
Hey paul, apologies for the slow process of accepting raids. Sadly, the procedure for raiding requires an approval by our DoW (from what it seems). I know I reached out to ask if you've needed anything in the past, but I'm sorry we weren't able to provide. Could you send Sick, iMcm, or I a PM with more detail about how the alliance has leaned over time? We can do our best to improve our alliances through this.
Thank you, and deep apologies,
-EA Delegate Beloxy
|
|
|
Beloxy reminds me of the guy at the hotel that tries to apologies and mints as compensation for your overpriced but crappy stay. |
|
ZapoleanJoin Date: 2012-04-05 Post Count: 9217 |
Look at all the FEAR on their knees begging to be accepted back.
zap zap |
|
|
|
The raiding system is ridiculous, we should be able to raid freely without approval directly from the DoW. If they insisted on a approval process, they have have Advisers so when they are offline, raids can still be approved.
There should be a different system anyway.
I sencerely apologize to SF, because they were forced to unally is because of outdated procedures.
I understand why SF did this. The blame falls upon FEAR for not updating it's procedures. |
|
|
lol you tried to get FEAR to help you raid FC lol done |
|