of     1   

golfgames1
#161243817Thursday, April 30, 2015 2:56 AM GMT

Marinio's impeachment trial was illegal and against constitutional law on impeachments. Any crimes proposed in the unlawful impeachment are forgiven due to lack of evidence and legal means of proposing such terms. All campaigning aside, really, guys? Marinio's trial was clearly unconstitutional just like Majestik's impeachment. We can't continue to let this happen. We have to stop it in its tracks before someone else, an innocent gets blamed again. More proof of this "impeachment trial" being conducted all wrong: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHCy-vDb6l4 No Chief Justice. The Chief Justice is the presiding officer for the President, but hey, he wasn't there! No charges. How are you going to impeach someone without any liable charges? No defense. How can Marinio defend himself? We understand now? - Senator Franklin D. Roosevelt
ForeverTaIl
#161245125Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:17 AM GMT

#truth signed
Marinio
#161245163Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:18 AM GMT

Yea - Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA)
kach
#161245401Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:23 AM GMT

Sigh ~senator kach
theEastCoastTurtle
#161245832Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:31 AM GMT

Signed, Senator theEastCoastTurtle
nativeshift
#161246094Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:36 AM GMT

that impeachment trial was like 2 years ago
soviet510
#161250327Thursday, April 30, 2015 5:24 AM GMT

Signed
NorthFuze
#161250354Thursday, April 30, 2015 5:25 AM GMT

Signed Senator Halo
Zak_Pak
#161250373Thursday, April 30, 2015 5:25 AM GMT

am sign
mohamed122601
#161261831Thursday, April 30, 2015 2:44 PM GMT

#truth signed, representative moh
Matimilion
#161271682Thursday, April 30, 2015 7:27 PM GMT

Signed, House Majority Leader Matimilion [R]
BonnieSBennett
#161401277Saturday, May 02, 2015 4:33 PM GMT

1) The Chief Justice was C8K, and we all know that C8K went inactive right after taking office. A sit-in Supreme Court Justice presided over the trial in absence of the CJ. 2) The charges were written down on a forum thread which was deleted but reposted on December 30: http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=121706286 3) He actually did defend himself; if you watched the video, you would see that Marinio refused to attend, but he sent in a formal testimony. (AKA it's an "in absentia" trial). 4) This is a Bill of Attainder and hence unconstitutional, so this bill doesn't work anyway. ~watch out for slithery slimy snakes~
golfgames1
#161401631Saturday, May 02, 2015 4:38 PM GMT

well too bad you're not congress but the senate are voting on it r/n
BonnieSBennett
#161403401Saturday, May 02, 2015 5:04 PM GMT

Continuing on the point of C8K, when he was the Chief Justice, inactivity wasn't a crime, so they couldn't impeach him. So yes, while the Chief Justice wasn't there, they had to manage with what they had. C8K ruined the supreme court for the longest time, and Congress wasn't going to sit around with someone ruining the executive branch. They had a sit-in Supreme Court Justice preside instead. Which is worse, having a sit-in Supreme Court Justice fill in for an inactive CJ, or a president who demands nudes and illegally passes his insane Constitutions? Think about that one. ~watch out for slithery slimy snakes~
Marinio
#161405180Saturday, May 02, 2015 5:32 PM GMT

or a president who demands nudes and illegally passes his insane Constitutions? 1. Demands Nudes: You are believing WandaCU's story but I never asked for them. I fired her for sending them. She went off all butthurt to try to get revenge. But I am glad you support that with zero evidence. 2. Illegally Passes Insane Constitutions: I only wrote one constitution. I wrote it because Nightgaladeld asked me to write it. Night established it, not me. It is literally a word for word copy of the RL one, substituting term lengths for the ones Night established, and taking out the parts discussing product trade and so forth. So it'd be a lie to say you never struck me as someone who saw the United States as an "insane" country. - Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA)
DeviousQueen
#161408018Saturday, May 02, 2015 6:15 PM GMT

Congress can actually vote on amnesty for people. This is fully constitutional. Once this passes, Marinio is free from a trial and can run freely. Although to be honest, even without this, he would still probably win the court case considering no LEGAL Chief Justice was there, and only the House of Representatives only voted, and not the Senate. Plus, the charges back then were so crappy lol
JacobKirkman
#161509685Monday, May 04, 2015 12:24 AM GMT

Signed to never put Marinio on watchlist, Signed, The Grand Duke of The Netherlands, Jacob Alan Henson
MarcoMonopoly
#161802187Saturday, May 09, 2015 5:42 AM GMT

Signed, Supported, MarcoVicario

    of     1