according to c&g, 1400<800

Join Date: 2009-07-02
Post Count: 1990

#161554419Monday, May 04, 2015 8:35 PM GMT

Don't ask why, but that's how I saw it.

Join Date: 2009-07-02
Post Count: 1990

#161579205Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:29 AM GMT

No joke

Join Date: 2014-11-07
Post Count: 11323

#161579258Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:30 AM GMT

How

Join Date: 2010-08-13
Post Count: 3642

#161579498Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:34 AM GMT

its true

Join Date: 2013-09-24
Post Count: 21684

#161579521Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:35 AM GMT

in what form

Join Date: 2009-07-02
Post Count: 1990

#161579954Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:43 AM GMT

They literally though 800 was greater than 1400 and that I was stupid for saying otherwise.

Join Date: 2010-07-04
Post Count: 34279

#161580014Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:44 AM GMT

well, they must have been referring to something if they said that c&g has dumbasses, but they cannot be that dumb chicken nuggets

Join Date: 2009-07-02
Post Count: 1990

#161581163Tuesday, May 05, 2015 3:04 AM GMT

Ooo, yes they are. I guess there's a difference in numerical quantity when it comes to post number

Join Date: 2010-07-04
Post Count: 34279

#161581512Tuesday, May 05, 2015 3:09 AM GMT

may i see this thread where someone said 1400<800