MarinioJoin Date: 2010-03-28
Post Count: 2314 |
Wait, so if the Constitution decides what law is, why do we have a Congress?
I mean, in that sense, we would then have to let people murder, steal, bomb, kidnap, gta, etc... and basically every other crime besides treason and war crimes, because...
The Constitution says NOTHING about those.
- Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA) |
|
soviet510Join Date: 2012-09-17
Post Count: 2705 |
Most of the people who were fped were either posting exploits like that cops guy or spammed.
Got a problem with that? Go talk to Night |
|
MarinioJoin Date: 2010-03-28
Post Count: 2314 |
That I can agree to. There are reasons to demote people to FP. There is no reason to neglect your job for another none USA group though, and lie saying that you had no internet. He said 2 days ago he had no wifi yet has been inactive for roughly 3.5 months. No excuse for that.
- Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA) |
|
|
The constitution lacks a definition of what 'other high crime or misdemeanor' is. Therefore, it is up to the Congress to define the charges they wish to lay out in the event of an impeachment. Impeachment is not limited to Treason or Bribery. Twice have judges been impeached of drnkeness, a Supreme Court Justice has been impeached of political bias.
These are not crimes specified by the Constitution, so when determining the impeachability (is that a word?) of a person (in this case, Zeyad), one would need to use the logic surrounding the irl impeachments I mentioned.
I will say that someone other than Ichigo should handle impeachments because
1) 'Impeachigo' is a word
2) He tends to lose cases
3) He has a new impeachment on the floor every other week |
|
|
The constitution doesn't need to define it since the constitution clearly states that the Supreme Court interpets the law, not Congress. |
|
|
The Supreme Court (irl) has ruled that the Federal judiciary is not permitted to oversee or review impeachment. There is no law outside of the Constitution regarding impeachment, so the Supreme Court really shouldn't even be a factor in the impeachment process. |
|
MarinioJoin Date: 2010-03-28
Post Count: 2314 |
There are only 2 times the slightest bit of the Supreme Court has anything to do with an impeachment trial.
1. The Chief Justice oversees a Presidential impeachment.
2. The Supreme Court can rule for a revote if the impeachment process was done illegal, which it hasn't.
We warned him of this. Then the House proposed a bill. It's about to pass. Next the Senate will vote. After the Senate favors, he will be removed.
- Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA) |
|
|
Oh
~[X ᴀ ʟ ᴇ ᴜ ᴍ] "Wᴇ ғɪɢʜᴛ ᴀs ᴏɴᴇ!"~ |
|
|
Except, you know, the Supreme Court can rule the impeachment as constitutional and revert it, lol. |
|
|
Da_masJoin Date: 2009-03-08
Post Count: 829 |
Aye. |
|
|
if I still count as a rep,
aye.
if not, then whatever. |
|
LolrothicJoin Date: 2013-08-24
Post Count: 260 |
Aye |
|
|
|
no, you need like 16 or 17
you have 11 atm |
|
|
MarinioJoin Date: 2010-03-28
Post Count: 2314 |
^ there isnt a slight statement wrong in that post
- Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA) |
|
|
|
MarinioJoin Date: 2010-03-28
Post Count: 2314 |
Current Votes Required to Pass: 12 (11 to Count Speaker iBuz's vote)
9-5-2
The Aye's
------------
Rep. Lolrothic
Rep. Damas1
Rep. Skeletonkid
Rep. Dralian
Rep. OwneD1991
Rep. Frosty4560
Rep. Ichigo5Kurosaki
Rep. LvkeHD
Rep. Queenbatoul
The Nay's
-------------
Rep. Aeokieek
Rep. Soviet510
Rep. Fruitsz
Rep. iComrade
Rep. DequanMcB
Vote to be Absent (Abstain)
------------------------------------
Rep. LadyVictoriaII
Rep. BodyRipped
- Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA) |
|
MarinioJoin Date: 2010-03-28
Post Count: 2314 |
Current Votes Required to Pass: 12 (11 to Count Speaker iBuz's vote)
10-5-2
The Aye's
------------
Rep. Lolrothic
Rep. Damas1
Rep. Skeletonkid
Rep. Dralian
Rep. Qyrn
Rep. OwneD1991
Rep. Frosty4560
Rep. Ichigo5Kurosaki
Rep. LvkeHD
Rep. Queenbatoul
The Nay's
-------------
Rep. Aeokieek
Rep. Soviet510
Rep. Fruitsz
Rep. iComrade
Rep. DequanMcB
Vote to be Absent (Abstain)
------------------------------------
Rep. LadyVictoriaII
Rep. BodyRipped
- Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA) |
|
meto02Join Date: 2008-12-17
Post Count: 11373 |
With great sorrow, my mind say to Aye this.
- House Majority Whip |
|
MarinioJoin Date: 2010-03-28
Post Count: 2314 |
11-4-2
No matter what the rest of the House votes, Zeyad is impeached.
- Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA) |
|
FamionJoin Date: 2008-11-29
Post Count: 1537 |
Who impeaches someone because they have no internet? It isn't his fault, he can't control that... |
|
|
Nay.
This pathetic and stupid. Zeyad has done nothing wrong, and you're accusing him for crimes he's done while he is barely online. Stop wasting people's time, Ichigao, and actually do something productive as a Representative instead of accusing people all the time.
Signed,
- Federal Worker, Elan |
|