|
Someone mentioned we declined war with TRA recently. That was due to king saying that movement of the spawns would break the base, after we had offered to reduce the health on our generator. Also because of kings attitude at the time towards us, which in my personal opinion, based solely on this thread, has not improved. |
|
|
|
>suggesting 99% of VS didn't want the TRA war
We voted for it, and it came out on top. The reason we didn't do it is because our old Deputy Head of War got angry with the leader and decided he couldn't be bothered to war TRA due to his anger. Not our fault.
|
|
YETIbotJoin Date: 2010-12-20 Post Count: 1215 |
This war heavily depends on TRA's HiCom and there's two ways they could decide this:
If they say yes to the 2v2 war they will contradict the whole "WE DON'T WAR POWER CLANS" and once the war is over, whatever the outcome, they will be questioned by power clans:
"Oh so what you were saying was an entire lie NOT to war us and yet you accept their war declaration, okay accept our war then."
TRA will then receive tons of war declarations.
If they say no it will leave their allies to a 2v1 and this will create a lot of external problems too; if TRA decide to back out, it will damage their alliance, then leaving UCR too ask the same question, do you 2v1 or back out like your allies and sort them out?
Just like any clan that backs out of a declaration of war they will tirelessly be criticized in c&g for as long as TRA stands...
Yes or no?
Le clock ticks. :) |
|
UtsuroidoJoin Date: 2008-09-26 Post Count: 18402 |
LMAO KING
|
|
Theta0Join Date: 2011-02-09 Post Count: 40750 |
>That was due to king saying that movement of the spawns would break the base,
he's an idiot
learn cframe
or matrices |
|
|
UCR is still holding on but with this war they shall also be humiliated.
---
What? |
|
|
Thea just be quiet and go reuse WIJ scripts or whatever it is you do. |
|
|
I like SF, they're a good clan |
|
MetricalsJoin Date: 2013-02-21 Post Count: 7334 |
HERE GOES VS DECLARING WAR WHEN THEY HAVE A TOP 5 CLAN TO CARRY THEM BUT NOT WHEN TRA WANTS WAR YUP |
|
|
kolwalskiJoin Date: 2009-05-01 Post Count: 7750 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kppx4bzfAaE |
|
VastspeedJoin Date: 2011-03-23 Post Count: 77 |
For honor and glory, strong we stand! |
|
JaylWNLJoin Date: 2015-03-31 Post Count: 4679 |
bump |
|
|
|
|
|
"TRA SCARED AF"
what the hell
we've already asked for the terms meeting we haven't even declined we're pushing for the war too as long as vs actually doesn't sit on their arses throughout the whole war while sf carries them |
|
TippeeJoin Date: 2010-12-21 Post Count: 768 |
So, it's pretty much Solitude Force pulling VS a win? |
|
ywisJoin Date: 2014-08-08 Post Count: 12931 |
Soticule*
And yes. |
|
CelestusJoin Date: 2011-08-15 Post Count: 14873 |
In other words TRA v SF since UCR and VS are inactive |
|
|
|
UCR isn't inactive, TRA can rally over 30+ war time. |
|
OriyanaJoin Date: 2013-02-16 Post Count: 285 |
uaf master race |
|
JaylWNLJoin Date: 2015-03-31 Post Count: 4679 |
The war will be close. UCR & TRA have very hard forts to win at & TRA will dominate in GMT timezone. |
|