|
"Sounds like someone doesn't watch hockey."
>thinks tampa will beat the Rangers
|
|
|
gabejossJoin Date: 2013-07-05
Post Count: 399 |
bruins won't win |
|
|
I see Tampa winning because they are a faster team and have a better offense and also have a decent enough defense to not lag behind. And Bishop can cause the Rangers some problems if he is able to stay as hot as he has been since the end of the first round. |
|
|
"I see Tampa winning because they are a faster team and have a better offense and also have a decent enough defense to not lag behind. And Bishop can cause the Rangers some problems if he is able to stay as hot as he has been since the end of the first round."
First of all, there is no team faster then the Rangers. Game 1 clearly proved the Rangers to be a faster team then Tampa due to all the races Tampa lost and what not. Second, your offense has been trash in the play-offs and let me remind you who you're facing. A team that has defensively shutdown Crosby and Malkin AND Ovechkin and Backstrom, this years best offensive duo. I highly doubt that Tyler Johnson, Nikita Kucherov, and a struggling Steven Stamkos will break the iron wall the Rangers have on the backend. Bishop will not cause the Rangers ANY sort of trouble lmao. Holtby was and will be the hardest goalie the Rangers will face in the play-offs this year. Why? This is Bishop's first time EVER being in the play-offs. Congrats he played good against Detroit, a team that had to fight for a play-offs spot, and Montreal, a rival team that had some of the worst offense all year. What's really going to kill Tampa is who the Rangers have in front of the net. Not someone who is 6'7" and who covers the entire net on his knee's but an absolute beast who is one of the best goalies to play in this day in age. Lundqvist as of right now, has the best stats out of any goaltender that is still alive in the post-season and continues to only give up 1 goal a game. There is just no way to compare Lundqvist to Bishop at this point. |
|
|
Head-to-Head in 2015: Lightning beat Rangers in all three meetings by a score of 5-1, 4-3, and 6-3.
I think the Lightning are very capable of getting through the Ranger defense and Lundqvist. |
|
NYY2Join Date: 2012-08-26
Post Count: 85 |
all i have to say is its gonna be a great series. |
|
NYY2Join Date: 2012-08-26
Post Count: 85 |
tbl!1!11!1
"Please Sir that is my dream to be a New York Ranger. I don't care how bad the team is or how good the team is I jast what to be a New York Ranger." |
|
|
Keep dreaming backup
They just got lucky
I've got to concentrate concentrate concentrate... |
|
|
And guess where that "luck" has put them at. :) |
|
|
Ok last night was 6-5
Like I said lucky
I've got to concentrate concentrate concentrate... |
|
|
NYY2Join Date: 2012-08-26
Post Count: 85 |
wow what... not luck at all |
|
|
Yesterday was game 3 my friend
Which was 6-5
I've got to concentrate concentrate concentrate... |
|
|
Monday was Game 2. And that was 6-2. |
|
|
And yesterday was game 3
I've got to concentrate concentrate concentrate... |
|
|
The Lightning didn't get this 2-1 series lead through 100% luck. |
|
|
Yeah they did
I don't believe in luck but they did
I've got to concentrate concentrate concentrate... |
|
|
So, because your oh-so precious Rangers got beat, it's luck? Because the Lightning totally haven't been proving why they're the highest scoring team in the playoffs. That's just absurd. |
|
|
I don't care to be honest
I've got to concentrate concentrate concentrate... |
|
NYY2Join Date: 2012-08-26
Post Count: 85 |
kay |
|
|
tbh stanley cup is like last year, whoever wins WCF wins everything |
|