Crook
#165742930Saturday, June 27, 2015 3:17 PM GMT

what if inactive guy comes back and he doesnt have an email
barbiegirl123123123
#165747875Saturday, June 27, 2015 4:19 PM GMT

support i seen so many old people get hacked oml
TheKillerEcho
#165779280Saturday, June 27, 2015 10:11 PM GMT

I think it's pretty stupid that ROBLOX shouldn't do something about PGing simply because someone had a weak pass. Not all players who get PGed have weak passes, you'd be surprised how good some people are are PGing.
TheKillerEcho
#165779368Saturday, June 27, 2015 10:12 PM GMT

And honestly, the ONLY reason that I can think of for why you WOULDN'T want ROBLOX to do something about PGing is if you're a PGer yourself.
stormguy890
#165780723Saturday, June 27, 2015 10:29 PM GMT

NO SUPPORT LET PG'ing GO ON ROBLOX Stormguy890 is an All-Subforumer
trainyay
#165794900Sunday, June 28, 2015 1:08 AM GMT

'And honestly, the ONLY reason that I can think of for why you WOULDN'T want ROBLOX to do something about PGing is if you're a PGer yourself.' Why should ROBLOX do something about PGing when they should instead focus on updating the site?
seal154
#165798267Sunday, June 28, 2015 1:47 AM GMT

Lol trainyay what the hell do you think this PG update would be doing?
sharpshot327
#165798613Sunday, June 28, 2015 1:51 AM GMT

I like it.
trainyay
#165800261Sunday, June 28, 2015 2:10 AM GMT

'Lol trainyay what the hell do you think this PG update would be doing?' All I know is that there is no way whatsoever to stop PGing completely, and even if there is one, ROBLOX should focus on updating the site properly instead.
TheKillerEcho
#166382166Friday, July 03, 2015 9:55 AM GMT

Bump.
Jorm12
#166383174Friday, July 03, 2015 10:25 AM GMT

Half support. But what if that user's account is not verified? What would be the other option? Forumer | Average PC Gamer | GabeNist | Hated by foul and ignorant Turds
nate979o
#166384303Friday, July 03, 2015 11:00 AM GMT

support
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#166414927Friday, July 03, 2015 6:38 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
TheKillerEcho
#166534647Saturday, July 04, 2015 9:28 PM GMT

@Jorm12: That's why I was asking for more suggestions. There are plenty of ways to protect accounts from PGing, it's just a matter of discovering them.
Caroling
#166535111Saturday, July 04, 2015 9:34 PM GMT

No Support If someone guesses the ow they deserve the account
TheKillerEcho
#166535175Saturday, July 04, 2015 9:35 PM GMT

Just because they have a weak pass doesn't mean they deserve to be PGed. Stealing accounts is against the rules, no ifs, no buts.
CorpseStacker
#166535336Saturday, July 04, 2015 9:36 PM GMT

bump
seal154
#166571856Sunday, July 05, 2015 5:20 AM GMT

Support bump.
glurbman
#166576669Sunday, July 05, 2015 6:33 AM GMT

i totally support --but i also support op
TheKillerEcho
#166642145Sunday, July 05, 2015 11:41 PM GMT

Bump.
seal154
#166798811Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:33 AM GMT

Bump.
Miven
#166802436Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:09 PM GMT

This sounds like a terribly... great idea! Support, but the first idea should only be implemented if a user is verified, for logical reasons.
seal154
#166903602Wednesday, July 08, 2015 7:49 AM GMT

Bampity.
mathsman49
#167032215Thursday, July 09, 2015 3:04 PM GMT

If an account was PGed, it's the owner's fault for choosing an easy PW.
FunificationAlt
#167034724Thursday, July 09, 2015 3:39 PM GMT

about to make a thread about it