of     1   

killer9094
#165189644Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:50 PM GMT

wasn't VAK losing miserably to FC in the old times? so doesnt that make old FC > old VAK and didnt gannex... well gannex the negotiations the 3rd time?
TheMedievalist
#165189722Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:51 PM GMT

no clan is #1, its only a perspective.
smithClock
#165189725Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:51 PM GMT

vak was winning the 2nd vak-fc good so
Zanziber
#165189753Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:51 PM GMT

well it destroyed v o i d and alot thought v o i d was #1 so..
killer9094
#165189757Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:51 PM GMT

wasn't the 2nd war by like 2 wins or 1 win?
zeus022
#165189801Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:52 PM GMT

nice b8 zanziber
HighSparrows
#165189959Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:53 PM GMT

vak was winning the 2nd one 12-7 or something But over all it was losing like 12-40
killer9094
#165190041Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:54 PM GMT

way I hear it, VAK vs FC still hasn't ended and its on a cease fire :-I
Antagonise
#165190279Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:57 PM GMT

systems like top 10 dont work imo because it will always be debated plus theres loads of things that make a good clan for example rat is quite a bit more active than fc but that doesnt automatically make fc worse i prefer the tier system really because you can group clans together like that it caters well to my ocd and my nostalgia of playing games like need for speed carbon where the cars were in tiers
SparrowSkorzeny
#165190300Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:57 PM GMT

vak was barely winning the second
sDiablo
#165190356Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:58 PM GMT

you forgot that FC always has unfair bases, while VAK give an easy base to win but they put up a fight
killer9094
#165190357Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:58 PM GMT

you put it nicely, antagonise, good job.
Antagonise
#165190550Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:00 PM GMT

you should take a look at this if you think the tier system works http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=165086361 whether or not its accurate is debatable but its definitely a good way of doing it
ida
#165190616Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:01 PM GMT

nobody labels vak as #1 anymore its between sf and void now
Antagonise
#165190706Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:03 PM GMT

i know nothing about sf like at all mind you i just came back after not logging on for 3 months but before that i remember you guys becoming relevant never seen you in action though i would assume youre good
SparrowSkorzeny
#165190851Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:04 PM GMT

yeah fc had the unfair base FC: 20 minute flag 30 players 5 FC for official Even spawning VAK: 30 minute flag 20 players 5 VAK for official - VAC/Dominion didn't count Uneven spawning. VAK gets better weps. Giant flying robot that VAK could use to shoot missles and spawnkill raiders with.
Nederlandz
#165190882Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:04 PM GMT

did teo just say vak has had fair bases
ida
#165191004Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:06 PM GMT

@ned recruitment center was fair kaznan was fair pyro was fair
SparrowSkorzeny
#165191236Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:09 PM GMT

lol
Nederlandz
#165191376Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:10 PM GMT

hmm its on the tip of my tongue begins with an a ends with c maybe ta in the middle
Utsuroido
#165191616Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:13 PM GMT

"while VAK give an easy base to win but they put up a fight" nice kissup m8 trying to get into vac i see O_o
SavannahN1998
#165191861Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:16 PM GMT

" while VAK give an easy base to win but they put up a fight" lol atac officer pistol dropship base updates
TheStalinator
#165191886Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:16 PM GMT

no clan is #1 no one claims vak is #1
HighSparrows
#165191904Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:16 PM GMT

And no Back in the day VAK didn't have 30 minutes Nor 20 players Not 5 for official It had 0 for official 20-30 players depends on the date we are talking and flag was 20 minutes
Expleo
#165192071Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:18 PM GMT

i consider vak still #1. when you can maintain a group for that long, and half the time without a leader on, on a regular basis, you're #1 in MY books. this is my opinion though.

    of     1