|
High:
Listen man, if you're from Russia/China, cool.
You guys kick ass too you know.
But come on, you can't just invade the United States lol. We can't invade you either.
the prick waiving stopped many years ago, so there's really no reason to try and revive it. |
|
|
Your forgetting the fact that the Chineese and Russia run on satelites which would be blown out of the sky within minutes of their attack and we'd be defending our satelites since we have the technology to do so. China doesn't have that technology why do you think they hacked the Pentagon? Their out of ideas and needed to steal some. |
|
Cart_rJoin Date: 2010-04-09
Post Count: 4280 |
there wouldn't just be a "US vs. Russia and China" war. it would become ww3. |
|
|
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." ~ Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto |
|
|
No response from HighSparrows.
I hope he accepted the reality of the situation. |
|
|
The only war that we will see like in 5 years maybe, it's a war in Europe against the muslims. |
|
|
You want to know the real way to wage war on a State?
You corrupt the State.
You take control of education, especially at college/university levels.
You teach people that the f-e (tus) doesn't have a heart beat early in the (pre)gnancy, you teach economics based on an extremist take on Marxism. You teach people that morality is subjective and can be overlooked for convenience.
Then you just let the wheels spin. A few decades of deteriorating standards and morality, and you've got yourself a recipe for civil unrest.
You let the people burn the State.
but what do I know anyway. |
|
|
I was raiding.
And no China+Russian navy>>
Also south Americans hate north americans it will be a secure landing + Support from locals.
Alaskas conditions are perfect for russians, maybe not so for chinese.
"China doesnt have the technology"
Ignorant child |
|
|
HighSparrows:
You basically skipped the entire Pacific ocean and said that South Americans would basically support invading forces.
The problem is you can't skip the Pacific. It's not like they'll just have a merry landing in South American.
And again, wrong Chinese+Russians having a more powerful navy.
And once we have NATO on our side forget it.
And then you still ignored the argument about Alaskan-invasion supplying...
Even if invasion forces could live off the land, you have plenty of opportunity for their forces to be bombarded in their encampment.
It is a hard terrain, and Russians are definitely suited for it, maybe more so than the US, but it's a home field advantage.
There are far too many points of conflict in the idea of Russian/Chinese combined invasion on the US.
> Incapable of carrying resources (man, machine, or otherwise)
> Incapable of defending carriers/transports
> Inadequate training across the board
> Difficult deployment strategies
> Incapable of holding/sustaining ground forces or conquered territories
It's just not happening man. |
|
|
Hacker, I hope you understand that NATO won't blindly follow the US if they are the aggressor. It all comes down to who is defender and who is attacker. For example, UN will support the defender, NATO probably won't help the US if they are the attackers, and really, pretty much no country likes the US. Spying on all of your allies is hardly a way to make friends.
Even then it wouldn't matter, because then NK would attack SK, the industry of the world would die, and Russia+US would nuke each other until the earth splits in half.. |
|
|
"And once we have NATO on our side forget it."
This was a Russia+China scenario if you Add allies the US is doomed.
Also nope China+Russia navy is superior maybe US beats them individually but not together. And Russia would need one of them artillery they are producing in 2016 to be landed and the US won't have a chance to bombard the supplies. |
|
|
They don't have a superior navy, even combined -.-
|
|
|
yup they do
Russias subs + Destroyers + Chinas navy is quite new recently updated> |
|
|
2uoJoin Date: 2013-10-27
Post Count: 6874 |
No one, because all three can use nuclear warfare. |
|
|
Anyone that thinks RUSSIA, CHINA or even both combined can beat the US is a real idiot. |
|
|
"Anyone that thinks RUSSIA, CHINA or even both combined can beat the US is a real idiot."
You are the idiot if you think the US can beat China and Russia... Like I said, all depends who attacks and who defends. Both would starve each other of resources and all three countries would die if it ever happened. |
|