of     1   

ChefBuckeye
#165487403Thursday, June 25, 2015 12:56 AM GMT

Make the maximum rank limit to 36 maximum ranks other than currently 19 which is about twice as many ranks.
ChefBuckeye
#165487464Thursday, June 25, 2015 12:57 AM GMT

Group related, forgot to add that on.
Maritusa_NneCharzaar
#165490462Thursday, June 25, 2015 1:29 AM GMT

Whoa, whoa, whoa. 36 is probably WAYYYYY too strong. We need a divisions tab, nonetheless.
Qyme
#165490719Thursday, June 25, 2015 1:32 AM GMT

Whoa, whoa, whoa. 36 is probably WAYYYYY too strong. [2]
iiDarkRoar
#165495214Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:22 AM GMT

I'd say make it unlimited. If you want, say 100 ranks, I say go for it. It's your decision. - Sir Decaying of the Souls
TheForumingForumer2
#165498581Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:01 AM GMT

idk why there is a limit its stupid someone tell me why there is a limit the second one
Wahhhy
#165498658Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:02 AM GMT

Whoa, whoa, whoa. 36 is probably WAYYYYY too strong. [3] You should make a new group for that.
Maritusa_NneCharzaar
#165561259Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:28 PM GMT

36 Maximum Ranks would normally trump most modern armies and corporations. A chain of command usually keeps simple with between 8-10 ranks. In fact, the modern US Army has currently 19 ranks, from E-1 to E-9, and O-1 to O-10.
Wahhhy
#167094466Friday, July 10, 2015 2:43 AM GMT

@Dynerov He's trying to make a rank for every job possible.
zombieslayer9901
#167095021Friday, July 10, 2015 2:48 AM GMT

Most USM groups replace the ranks from simply E-1 to E-1/E-2
Gregtracy35094
#167095629Friday, July 10, 2015 2:54 AM GMT

then war clannies will get stronger
Insomnian
#167100604Friday, July 10, 2015 3:47 AM GMT

I saw someone's suggestion on this. I think making a division would be good, maybe be able to make some ranks in those divisions, but I think 36 ranks could possibly be a bit too much. However, change it up a bit and I support.

    of     1