|
This feature was removed a few years ago due to inflation.
I propose that it is amended so that it can be brought back into the game.
My proposal:
Just to clarify, at a maximum,
BC can receive 25 ROBUX
TBC can receive 45 ROBUX
OBC can receive 70 ROBUX.
I propose that over a period of a month, an implementation of 1 ROBUX be added onto the value a user obtains a day. This would mean it would take ten months to achieve the maximum values, and would only be available to users who purchase the annually recurring membership, or at least ten months of monthly recurring membership.
These values can be modify to suit the current state of the economy, and can be used as a way to stimulate/slow down the economy, (what I'm saying is ROBLOX can change the maximum value whenever they want to match the current economy).
Not only that, but users are less likely to obtain the current maximum as a result of the removal of the lifetime option and six month recurring membership, making inflation a lot less likely scenario.
This will also give players a reason to keep paying for a recurring membership, as they will want the additional ROBUX (most likely?).
Also, to prevent any automatic issues, I also propose that BC users who have had membership prior to the update, should have to wait ten months after the update to receive said maximum values.
Hopefully you will understand what I have said and if disagreed with a formidable criticism with the reasons it is a generally bad idea should be included, to prevent any misunderstandings. |
|
|
So...You want to get more than what you paid for? |
|
|
But of course, a bigger reason to support is that inflation is still quite bad, this would only harm it a lot more. |
|
|
|
Let me clarify that point before anyone continues
This is included with what you pay for.
It will be stated in the terms. |
|
|
ROBUX value is a lot higher than TIX in this past year.
This would likely help it because an increase in ROBUX in the economy would slightly inflate ROBUX so it would match what it was prior to this inflation nonsense (1 ROBUX = 10 TIX) rather than (1 ROBUX = 22 TIX) |
|
|
"It will be stated in the terms."
But it's not, right now, meaning you're wanting more than what you paid for. |
|
|
There are users who purchased BC when this was a feature? |
|
|
(and continue to have it to this day?) |
|
|
"This would likely help it because an increase in ROBUX in the economy would slightly inflate ROBUX so it would match what it was prior to this inflation nonsense (1 ROBUX = 10 TIX) rather than (1 ROBUX = 22 TIX)"
And that's not something we'd like to risk now, is it? It'd be quite bad if it became even less valuable.
There are a lot more people who have BC now than they did back when this was a feature, so just because it was fine back then, doesn't mean it'll be fine now.
"There are users who purchased BC when this was a feature?"
And there are more who purchased when it was removed. |
|
|
Your argument about me wanting more than what I paid for is invalid, because I bought my membership when this was a feature, almost specifically for this feature.
Additionally, I must be a bit rusty on the economy if 1 ROBUX == 10 TIX is bad, because I remember it being there and people saying ROBUX is just fine.
|
|
|
"Your argument about me wanting more than what I paid for is invalid, because I bought my membership when this was a feature, almost specifically for this feature."
...But, there are a lot more who didn't. They never paid for that, so they shouldn't get it.
Giving it to people who got it previously would make it unfair.
Of course, due to how things turn out, ROBUX is probably worth almost double the amount it was when you bought this.
1 R$ tends to be equiavelent to somewhere between 16 and 22 Tix.
Therefore, there's no need for it.
"Additionally, I must be a bit rusty on the economy if 1 ROBUX == 10 TIX is bad, because I remember it being there and people saying ROBUX is just fine."
I was meaning there's a huge risk of it going down to 1 R$ equalling less than 10 Tix, especially when everyone who has BC currently earns 10 R$ more than they do now.
I do wonder how this would turn out if I posted this but asking for NBC Loyalty Bonus. |
|
|
In 2008, 1 ROBUX = 8 TIX. (but that's then, when there were less than a million players, so that doesn't really matter)
Also, users who bought that feature paid exactly the same as users who did not, so it would be okay to allow users who hadn't paid for it to receive it.
And, this feature wasn't added at the same time as BC originally, so does that mean that when ROBLOX implemented the feature, all the current memberships should've been cancelled/ didn't deserve the feature? |
|
|
As for the NBC feature, if you really wanted to make ROBUX == more TIX, you could base the amount of TIX made by NBC users increase by the amount of days they have been actively playing ROBLOX. (Include maximum values as well //probably 20-25 tix?) |
|
|
You could have a NBC Loyalty Bonus to balance the ROBUX to TIX values if you like? |
|
|
"In 2008, 1 ROBUX = 8 TIX. (but that's then, when there were less than a million players, so that doesn't really matter)"
But now there's more than a million players, so I think it does quite matter.
"Also, users who bought that feature paid exactly the same as users who did not, so it would be okay to allow users who hadn't paid for it to receive it."
But then that's asking for more rights for BC other than bringing back a feature, which we all know is quite ridiculous to request.
"And, this feature wasn't added at the same time as BC originally, so does that mean that when ROBLOX implemented the feature, all the current memberships should've been cancelled/ didn't deserve the feature?"
Did they pay for it? No? Then no, they shouldn't of deserved the feature.
Was it paid for? Yes? Then they deserve the feature.
Of course, this feature is years old, and I'm sure it was removed for good reasons. It would cause problems being re-added. |
|
|
"You could have a NBC Loyalty Bonus to balance the ROBUX to TIX values if you like?"
Then what's the point in having BC loyalty if it's all going to end up the same? |
|
|
What I meant by 1 ROBUX = 8 TIX not mattering is the fact that there were a lot less players, so ROBUX to TIX values would be a bit more balanced, so it is understandable the values are higher. |
|
|
"What's the point in having BC loyalty if it ends up all the same?"
What do you mean?
What I meant is NBC players get increases in the TIX made every day, not the amount of ROBUX made. |
|
|
"You could have a NBC Loyalty Bonus to balance the ROBUX to TIX values if you like?"
If in the end it just balances it out, there'd be no point in it.
Anyway, the 15 R$ from back when this was a feature is now worth between 25 and 30 R$, today. Really no point in risking it all going to crap. |
|
|
|
@ Legendary
Very helpful response.
(not.) |
|