|
I have had countless times tried to make a very long response to a forum post. But, uh oh, something in the message is against the rules! The thing is, I don't exactly LIKE spending hours trying to find what is wrong with the very long post. So perhaps there could be a way to see what parts in your response/message break what rules and why. It would be very helpful for fixing the messages quickly instead of having to basically rewrite it. |
|
|
|
guess I get no support :c but also another bump c: |
|
|
penapoxJoin Date: 2014-07-05
Post Count: 1597 |
Support
liar liar pants on fire hanging from an electric wire |
|
|
|
:D My dreams have come true. Thx 4 support. I really hope this does happen cause I've written some really good long messages, and this has happened way too many times. Plus it could help people understand warnings or bans better if they expanded on why and where they broke a rule, instead of throwing text at you and saying you broke a rule. |
|
gmixerJoin Date: 2010-07-28
Post Count: 14246 |
support
|
|
|
New ways to filterpass.
No support |
|
|
How would this create filter passing? How would that even work anyway, trying to pass filters is against the rules so you'll just get reported if you try to filter pass. |
|
|
Because most of the words censored are bad or they just don't want you saying it, but knowing exactly which word it is will immediately allow you to self-censor it and effortlessly bypass the filter. For example, I know the word "pass.word" is banned, and because of that I know to immediately censor it and ignore the filter on it. |
|
|
What wonderful72pike said. |
|
|
Well then it would be good to have some kind of list of what words are banned, but that would also cause filter pass from what you're saying I guess. But still, I shouldn't have to rewrite a whole post just to fix something breaking the rules. If someone filter passes, they will get reported then, I have no intention of filter passing with this being a thing, if something breaks the rules I will reword it to be more appropriate or remove it entirely. |
|
|
If you're not allowed to post because of the filter, you should probably know what you're doing wrong. If you're questioning something before posting it, you know there's a problem.
In simpler terms: you should know. |
|
|
The point is this will make it a hundred times easier to do. Whether you intended for it to happen or not, it's a consequence of the idea that I can't support. Again, most words that are censored are somewhat obvious. Just think of which words in your post you don't usually use, or think of which ones can cause controversy for some reason. There's always a substitute word for it. |
|
|
The post I made that really got me thinking about this had nothing inapp I could think of in it. I said kill a few times, but murder is allowed on ROBLOX, so that isn't really inappropriate, nor was really anything in my post. So I disagree, I really shouldn't "know" |
|
|
0nesh0tJoin Date: 2012-03-24
Post Count: 15845 |
support
Checkmate. |
|
|
@cyber
Pretty sure any ROBLOX problem could be considered a first world problem. Or are there actual ROBLOXians starving and dying of thirst and hunger? |
|
|
|