|
The title was an example of smallcaps. You can use them to filterpass and say vulgar words.
There are a ton of generators online so its not hard to find one and filterpass.
It would only make sense to filter all the symbols smallcaps can create so no-one could filterpass with them.
Bump |
|
|
Tʜᴇʀᴇ ᴀʀᴇ ɢᴇɴᴇʀᴀᴛᴏʀs ғᴏʀ ᴛʜɪs ᴋɪɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴏɴʟɪɴᴇ, sᴏ ɪᴛ's ɴᴏᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴛʜɪs ɪs ʜᴀʀᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴅᴏ ᴇɪᴛʜᴇʀ. sᴜᴘᴘᴏʀᴛ. |
|
ArenemiusJoin Date: 2010-11-03
Post Count: 11941 |
sᴜᴘᴘᴏʀᴛ. |
|
|
|
SUPPORT. THERE’S NO REASON FOR IT.
GG |
|
|
tried small caps on Word.
didn't work.
gg |
|
|
|
They're just gonna find another way to bypass the filter
it's no use |
|
cooper135Join Date: 2011-01-29
Post Count: 10780 |
Support |
|
|
No support
it looks cool. |
|
|
but some people will use it to be cool
for sigs and things
people will be complaining and there would still be ways to filterpass
no suppot
Well howdy-ho, everybody! |
|
cooper135Join Date: 2011-01-29
Post Count: 10780 |
So you only care about it looking cool? Think about the children!
Bump |
|
austint30Join Date: 2010-03-20
Post Count: 1482 |
s��ᴘᴘᴏʀᴛ! |
|
|
No support.
I understand that you would block them to take another step towards a working filter, but smallcap symbols are kinda cool and can make text more interesting if used it.
Instead, you should suggest that they be treated by the filter system as a normal letter.
So, if the word 'cucumber' was blocked and you wrote: 'ᴄUCUᴍʙᴇʀ', the system would see it as 'cUCUmber' and block it. |
|
cooper135Join Date: 2011-01-29
Post Count: 10780 |
That's going to be pretty hard to do.
Bump |
|
|
What is? My suggestion?
If you mean mine, you are mistaken. I am a programmer, and I can say with full confidence it is not very difficult to implement, and would cause miniscule lag between submitting a message, processing it in the filter, and then displaying it. |
|
cooper135Join Date: 2011-01-29
Post Count: 10780 |
Ok thanks
I didn't know that was possible to do.
I wish there was an edit button.
Bump |
|