Okay we should not call this a ro-war

Join Date: 2012-09-15
Post Count: 23091

#180885641Saturday, January 02, 2016 4:21 AM GMT

Since it's not like other ro wars apparently (I wasn't there so i wouldn't know.) And some people seem to be having a problem with it. Just call it something else lol. Like Coalition War or something.

jack705

Join Date: 2008-06-27
Post Count: 6400

#180885681Saturday, January 02, 2016 4:22 AM GMT

Works with me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Theta0

Join Date: 2011-02-09
Post Count: 40750

#180885690Saturday, January 02, 2016 4:22 AM GMT

its a coalition war yes, but i havent seen a conflict of this size in in two years or so ribbit

lionbaita

Join Date: 2012-09-15
Post Count: 23091

#180885883Saturday, January 02, 2016 4:26 AM GMT

Im fine with anything as long as it's a war. My point was for those vets who find calling it a ro war offensive I wonder which group to join for it though.

Poorlawn

Join Date: 2013-05-30
Post Count: 12372

#180885957Saturday, January 02, 2016 4:27 AM GMT

this is basically what the entire argument is us ro-war vets say that this shouldn't be called a ro-war because it aint and everyone else is like "woo it a ro-war!!!" just call it a large war or a coalition war or come up with your own term this isnt a ro-war

jack705

Join Date: 2008-06-27
Post Count: 6400

#180885993Saturday, January 02, 2016 4:27 AM GMT

@Poorlawn x2