of     1   

Romeeeo
#182732323Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:27 AM GMT

Are they connected? It's interesting to think about.. if there is a ratio between natural intelligence and your athletic ability. I mean, would someone who's really smart be not naturally as athletic, and vice versa? What do you think? It's all in your psychology
Fractionalist
#182732543Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:31 AM GMT

Romeeeo, I think you're probably one of the best oters you've always got a topic that can make you really think about it some real things that need to be discussed, and it isn't just random poo or bait
Romeeeo
#182732790Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:36 AM GMT

@Queen Thanks! Just naturally curious about the topic, so I wanted to hear the views that others held. It's all in your psychology
Slydexia
#182732795Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:36 AM GMT

yes because smart people can decipher, understand, and control athletic people can only muscle and cardio
MakeUrDreamsComeTrue
#182732852Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:37 AM GMT

Well, my older brother is really smart and he's pretty athletic, although he doesn't do sports, he can run a really fast mile times and such.
Negativize
#182732920Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:39 AM GMT

I am VERY smart but I'm like the weakest person in PE lol Middle click a tab to duplicate it!
MakeUrDreamsComeTrue
#182733028Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:41 AM GMT

It kind of just depends on the person, some people are smart, some are athletic, some are both. Kind of like right hand, left hand, and ambidextrous if you think about it like that.
Slydexia
#182733121Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:43 AM GMT

i've never met anyone who was both athletic and smart but that's only because i've never met anyone who was smart
Romeeeo
#182733602Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:53 AM GMT

True, but I agree that both can be strengthed. You can obviously advance as a professional rocket scientist while being a great player at every sport, but the main idea is if one of these things were just naturally higher for you. It might be, from an evolutionary standpoint, that humans had two versions (similar to night-owl and early-bird theory), that maybe some humans were the ones who had to help the entire group as in where to travel and gaining food + resources, and another group to help with the actual labor. Just an idea. It's all in your psychology

    of     1