|
I aye for the 22nd Amendment, however, I would like for the 23rd amendment to be re-presented with more clarification just to prevent any future legal issues. Therefore, I will be naying the 23rd. I understand what KOT is saying in the comments but what he is saying is not going to be in the amendment which will lead to confusion and loopholes in the future.
t l ; d r
22nd - Aye
23rd - Nay
@KOT, read the whole thing
(Ret.) Admiral,
- Trump
|
|
ArpycJoin Date: 2014-07-21
Post Count: 1788 |
Senate needs 5 more ayes on the 22nd
6 more ayes on the 23rd
House needs 14 more ayes on both i believe |
|
ArpycJoin Date: 2014-07-21
Post Count: 1788 |
House needs 14 more ayes on 22nd
15 more ayes on 23rd |
|
ArpycJoin Date: 2014-07-21
Post Count: 1788 |
Forgot acid was a rep now qq
so Senate needs 6 more ayes on 22nd
7 more ayes on 23rd
House needs 13 more ayes on 22nd
14 more ayes on 23rd |
|
|
BakerleyJoin Date: 2009-10-12
Post Count: 12011 |
Aye to both. |
|
|
MeraxJoin Date: 2012-09-30
Post Count: 757 |
aye to both |
|
|
iRealizmJoin Date: 2012-01-31
Post Count: 621 |
Aye |
|
|
Aye for both
Senator JackRockwell
|
|
|
ArpycJoin Date: 2014-07-21
Post Count: 1788 |
so Senate needs 1 more ayes on 22nd
2 more ayes on 23rd
House needs 11 more ayes on 22nd
13 more ayes on 23rd |
|
|
soviet510Join Date: 2012-09-17
Post Count: 2705 |
Aye-22nd amendment
Nay-23rd amendment |
|
AeokieekJoin Date: 2011-09-21
Post Count: 2219 |
aye
|
|
|
the 23rd amendment allows the sc to check if things are constution all without having to be given a case be submitted
This completely destroys a reason to have a sc if we are even going to be realistic and gives them more power
Untop of that it says congress and president can deny it anymore which makes this useless, nay! |
|
XxEminemJoin Date: 2011-11-05
Post Count: 203 |
Aye - Both
House of Representative |
|
|
Fruits,
As the author of the Constitution, you must know you already gave the Supreme Court the power to do that with the Anytime Review Clause. If you're interpreting this as a Supreme Court power-grab, you're gravely mistaken.
What this will do:
- Establish a *crisis resolution system*; as the Amendment implies, this is not for use in addressing trivial matters, like the constitutionality of an Act of Congress - issues like that should be addressed by the judiciary, and through a case. For issues in which all three branches play a *major* role in, all three branches should reach a solution together. This Amendment establishes a system for doing so, thus the power of Congress to regulate the implementation of the resolution, and the power of the President and of Congress to veto the resolution, should the Supreme Court attempt to make a decision about a major crisis without including the other branches.
- Increase cooperation between the branches; we need this to be able to make true progress. The branches shouldn't throw obstacles in front of each other, they should work together to get things done.
I hope you can take these points into consideration and support this Amendment.
|
|
|
RichCloutJoin Date: 2010-08-01
Post Count: 580 |
Nay.
Senate Majority Leader, James R. Clapper |
|
ArpycJoin Date: 2014-07-21
Post Count: 1788 |
Change 23rd to nay
seems useless if it can be overturned with a simple note from the POTUS or Congress |
|
RichCloutJoin Date: 2010-08-01
Post Count: 580 |
Aye - 22nd
Nay - 23rd
Senate Majority Leader, James R. Clapper |
|
ArpycJoin Date: 2014-07-21
Post Count: 1788 |
change back to aye |
|
|
aye both
Representative LittleSized (R/Michigan) |
|