|
No support because of WNTS. Aka removing an entire update. And who just plays roller coaster games on Roblox anyways? You are a loser. Without the physics update games like Suspension Testing by geico480 and such wouldn't be possible. Idiots. |
|
|
"No support because of WNTS. Aka removing an entire update."
We don't want the update to be entirely removed (that would be just as stupid as removing the old physics)
"And who just plays roller coaster games on Roblox anyways? You are a loser."
Lots of people. Just look at the log-in page for example-- people love them.
"Without the physics update games like Suspension Testing by geico480 and such wouldn't be possible. Idiots."
We don't want the update to be entirely removed [2]
Also, roller coasters and lots of other things (including certain cars) aren't possible with the physics update
Are you always like this or are you just having a bad day |
|
|
"they just wont do things that are on WNTS (which is what everyone suggests these days...)"
That sounds like a cop out to me...
"You have a good suggested idea that many people agree with? guess what it aint gonna be taken into consideration because its considered a "WNTS", which is just our way of saying we realize a lot of people want this but were gonna ignore that and keep on trucking through"
Honestly when you start putting limits on what people can suggest in a "Suggestion Forum" it gets problomatic, What we need is a mod or someone at ROBLOX who patrols the suggestions forum and is given the right by the company ( ROBLOX ) to issue statement on the different suggestions.
Someone who can be like "It is a possibility" or "We will look further into this" just about any kind of official reply on one of these suggestions that gives players an idea that its at least being taken into consideration.
-Mini Rant End-
|
|
KW1Join Date: 2010-11-05
Post Count: 77 |
I don't know what's up with all the people calling this a WNTS but from what I can see none of them are very respectable game developers who I take are just replying without even reading the article... I never once asked for the total removal of the update.
Please let those with brains give the opinions :) |
|
PlayerArcJoin Date: 2013-11-02
Post Count: 18 |
I support this. |
|
firippuJoin Date: 2013-08-06
Post Count: 233 |
bump
|
|
ropes05Join Date: 2015-06-29
Post Count: 7 |
keep fun land. i declare or i will leave. ##### |
|
|
andreja6Join Date: 2008-12-02
Post Count: 1198 |
SAVE COASTERS! |
|
|
|
We don't want roblox to update or this theme park will be gone forever
|
|
KW1Join Date: 2010-11-05
Post Count: 77 |
Skateboards, Coasters, some weapons and even some planes broke because of this update... |
|
|
Supported.
God, so many things are broken here. |
|
|
Along with this, let me point out something.
I think you know what Roblox Point is, right?
The thing that's on THE SIGNUP PAGE FOR THE SITE?
Prove your point that no one plays these games now, buddy. |
|
|
TealTeamJoin Date: 2015-01-06
Post Count: 720 |
bump |
|
|
We should have both physics so the fire truck in Ultimate driving can be steered and Suspension testing be still possible! |
|
cadefreeJoin Date: 2013-12-29
Post Count: 1 |
Roblox needs to let lose on the whole realistic felling it just makes it boring but if the do want to add it at lest put an option for gravity realisticness
|
|
|
'WNTS'
oh, you mean 'dont question any changes we make'
it's not like you get changelogs that actually tell you what they're updating |
|
|
XenonLiJoin Date: 2009-08-19
Post Count: 5013 |
a better solution:
for realistic roller-coasters you can make the velocity of the rollercoaster based on the height and initial velocity.
faster when lower, slower when higher
besides that allowing no true "frictionless" materials is realistic |
|
|
"a better solution:
for realistic roller-coasters you can make the velocity of the rollercoaster based on the height and initial velocity.
faster when lower, slower when higher"
in them olden days (from preliminary coasters to like 2012 or 2011 or something) this was the method
it was abandoned for a reason
these rides were often clunky and 0friction provided a much more realistic and entertaining ride (plus one of the reasons i've been playing roblox for almost 7 years is because of their physics engine)
"besides that allowing no true "frictionless" materials is realistic"
they still have truly frictionless materials
but also, the "frictionless" we had before was far from frictionless, heck, it wasn't nearly as slippery as ice
slide down a 0-friction brick and you'll stop in what would be like 2-3 yards irl
also coasters would slowly slow down due to friction (or other factors such as sharp angles on the rails because you can't round things out very well without having lots of lag), even when the rails were frictionless |
|
XenonLiJoin Date: 2009-08-19
Post Count: 5013 |
and you didn't expect physics or scripting to improve in 4 years?
seriously |
|
devSpeedJoin Date: 2015-01-17
Post Count: 34 |
Support x100 <3
Bump
Ya, you actually think those people got their peniculus erectus stuck in a toaster. |
|
|
Too bad roblox doesn't care what we think :(
|
|