I have come to the conclusion that group size is irrelevant

Mordaux

Join Date: 2009-06-02
Post Count: 1439

#183976049Saturday, February 20, 2016 1:14 AM GMT

Due to the insane amount of PM bot usage. Anyone disagree?

TheShadowMessage

Join Date: 2012-09-21
Post Count: 10379

#183976438Saturday, February 20, 2016 1:21 AM GMT

here. here is a hero let history remember him forever as the one who discovered the dark truth behind group size

Centurians

Join Date: 2012-10-05
Post Count: 28838

#183976481Saturday, February 20, 2016 1:22 AM GMT

cOLD mOLD on a sLATE pLATE ℒℯgitimate Millionaire / Offer on 7.9MIL+ in limiteds! / Also known as: Qiaolian/Pyrante or Rionan

[rfa#hidefromsearch]

Join Date: 0001-01-01
Post Count: 0

#183976512Saturday, February 20, 2016 1:23 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]

Mordaux

Join Date: 2009-06-02
Post Count: 1439

#184390959Saturday, February 27, 2016 6:10 AM GMT

I feel so old.

RyferionPrime

Join Date: 2012-07-01
Post Count: 3782

#184391038Saturday, February 27, 2016 6:12 AM GMT

duh But tbh occasional superclans use size as their source of activity. For example, ideally, theoretically: 400 large powerclan has 200 people on every day, 50 of which attend events. 25k large superclan has 5000 people on once in a while, around 35-50 of which are on at the time of a training. This is theoretical, but yet again, superclans seem to always die on me.

[rfa#hidefromsearch]

Join Date: 0001-01-01
Post Count: 0

#184391192Saturday, February 27, 2016 6:18 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]