Should bethesda let obsidian make another FO game?

ILikeToBragg

Join Date: 2009-11-27
Post Count: 3199

#184588203Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:27 PM GMT

? "There is nothing like a good lie."

Xuborus

Join Date: 2011-12-19
Post Count: 10437

#184588303Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:30 PM GMT

yes, because they could revive the series after bethesda tarnished it. they might as well sell obsidian the rights.

AX94

Join Date: 2011-08-09
Post Count: 7390

#184588389Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:33 PM GMT

Yes! Obsidian actually knows how to make RPGs, unlike Bethesda.

kistvaen

Join Date: 2009-07-25
Post Count: 10413

#184588461Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:36 PM GMT

not unless it has PvP multiplayer

AX94

Join Date: 2011-08-09
Post Count: 7390

#184588814Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:47 PM GMT

Fallout and Multiplayer don't mix. The game is about the desolation of post-nuclear America, not free-for-all shoot-em-up. Single player or gtfo.

kistvaen

Join Date: 2009-07-25
Post Count: 10413

#184589028Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:54 PM GMT

you gtfo nerd rpg games are better in multiplayer

AX94

Join Date: 2011-08-09
Post Count: 7390

#184589155Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:58 PM GMT

MP Fallout would only be good if it were two-player only. Online or splitscreen.

ILikeToBragg

Join Date: 2009-11-27
Post Count: 3199

#184621083Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:26 AM GMT

Let me just throw in my two cents. A multiplayer fallout game should have a slightly different story when there is two players. like for example instead of having the beginning of fallout 3 where the lone wanderer is born. maybe have the story be where they are born twins. "There is nothing like a good lie."