|
PRESS RELEASE ---
THE OFFICE OF THE MAJORITY LEADER OF THE SENATE,
KING FRUITSZ's OFFICE,
FEDERAL HOTEL, WASHINGTON DC,
Currently the SC has done a lot of things that we as Congress don't agree with, one they decided to tell us how we are to expel our members which is totally overstepping their boundaries, I will be making a sc case against this ridiculousness, last time I checked the SC can't alter the constitution without a amendment passing.
Second the house is being called on to start the impeachment of the inactive Supreme Court Justice, SilentShadow.
The SCJ didn't have the balls to remove her for her inactivity so Congress now will.
In the bottom of the replies voice your opinions citizens!
SIGNED, King FruitsZ
|
|
|
plutocrats are in the minority |
|
OzzymenJoin Date: 2011-05-26
Post Count: 7115 |
Completely agree with this, the Supreme Court and the judicial branch overall are really starting to overstep their authority and need to be put into check, I suggest you ignore ANY supreme court rulings on how expulsions are handled, as it states in the CONSTITUTION that each house are in-charge of their own proceedings.
AKA expulsions.
|
|
AIoysiusJoin Date: 2012-02-27
Post Count: 3 |
Completely agree with this, they continue to overstep their boundaries and it needs to be stopped. |
|
|
|
If FruitsZ, Ozzymen, and myself can agree on something, it's true. |
|
CaseFosJoin Date: 2016-04-12
Post Count: 57 |
The authority of they have they abuse it. |
|
BakerleyJoin Date: 2009-10-12
Post Count: 12011 |
"hey decided to tell us how we are to expel our members"
Okay, hang on.
They told you that you have to expel members on a forum thread vote.
Let's look at the constitution that YOU wrote:
"Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and on a public forum expel a member"
"on a public forum expel a member"
They were reminding you about the constitution which YOU WROTE! That isn't overstepping their authority; that's doing their job. |
|
|
@Bak
I am assume you havent seen their majority opinion google doc?
It clearly says in their DoC that congress can't expel for political reasons.
|
|
|
The majority opinion formally recognizes the right of each House of Congress to expel its members, however, formally grants any expelled member the right to appeal to This Court his expulsion on the simple criteria listed below;
#1 - Does this person or his/her actions disrupt Congressional Business?
#2 - Has this person committed a crime or act warranting such punishment?
#3 - Is this person being expelled for political reasons?
If #1 or #2 is correct, and #3 false, then the Supreme Court shall always hold the expulsion valid. If #1 or #2 is not true, and #3 IS true, then the Supreme Court shall always hold the expulsion as non valid and return the Senator or House Representative to their seat.
^^
Read that LOL.
|
|
soviet510Join Date: 2012-09-17
Post Count: 2705 |
no reply |
|
|
Point?
Also, you're not Majority Leader.... |
|
|
"Point?"
Stop overstepping your boundaries lmao
|
|
SeekHuntJoin Date: 2015-06-14
Post Count: 1139 |
If the member you are taking about is WillGaudet, didn't y'all let him in illegally? |
|
Jeremi_hJoin Date: 2012-10-28
Post Count: 92 |
WillGaudet just admitted to lying the whole time.
http://prnt.sc/av77fv
https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=187725091 #KickWillGaudetOutOfCongress
|
|
SeekHuntJoin Date: 2015-06-14
Post Count: 1139 |
And aren't you overstepping your boundaries by claiming to be the majority leader? |
|
|
That actually was a typo
cuz I forgot plutos lost maj
and how is giving myself a title I mistakenly thought I had overstepping anything lmao
|
|
SeekHuntJoin Date: 2015-06-14
Post Count: 1139 |
If it was an accident then it's not overstepping.
But who's the member they asked you to expel? |
|
|
lmao we didn't overstep
you cant expel someone for no reason lmao
also anytime review gave us the power to overrule unconstitutional expulsions lmao |
|
karetsJoin Date: 2012-06-29
Post Count: 2902 |
support
senator fome |
|
|
"lmao we didn't overstep
you cant expel someone for no reason lmao
also anytime review gave us the power to overrule unconstitutional expulsions lmao"
"you cant expel someone for no reason lmao"
no cons says otherwise
the house may determine its own rulings and expel their members for disorderly behavior.
LOL YOUR "ANYTIME REVIEW"
is not able 2 touch constitutional protected sht
|
|
|
you can only expel for disorderly behavior or if a person has done a crime |
|
|
"you can only expel for disorderly behavior or if a person has done a crime"
Where does it say or "crime"
We are allowed to expel for disorderly behavior were we see fit
Your anytime review
doesn't give you the right by the cons to change amendments as you please
and anything that are protected by those amendments you cannot change 2 ur pleasing
|
|
|
"5. No Representative shall commit any action prohibited by this Constitution or by law."
"10. No Senator shall commit any action prohibited by this Constitution or by law"
have you not read the constitution you wrote
also, it's called defining. it's done alot in the SC, and it's kinda our job. |
|
|
""5. No Representative shall commit any action prohibited by this Constitution or by law."
"10. No Senator shall commit any action prohibited by this Constitution or by law"
have you not read the constitution you wrote
also, it's called defining. it's done alot in the SC, and it's kinda our job."
"""5. No Representative shall commit any action prohibited by this Constitution or by law."
"10. No Senator shall commit any action prohibited by this Constitution or by law""
ok the cons gives us the right to expel 4 disorderly behavior so thx for proving my point you moron
"defining" you arent defining crap, youre literally changing it by telling us what we can expel for and what we cant
|
|