Luigi886Join Date: 2008-07-30
Post Count: 4779 |
[ Content Deleted ] |
|
|
kaspar22Join Date: 2009-01-06
Post Count: 999 |
I disagree |
|
|
First of all, thats in "What not to Suggest." And, Robloxians are "Blocks," not "Humans." So, no. |
|
|
XenobosJoin Date: 2008-12-06
Post Count: 415 |
Uff.... Why this is suggested if is not good?
We are made of plastic not humans we can't wear shoes and way too lag because of meshes |
|
linustJoin Date: 2008-09-09
Post Count: 674 |
OH NO roblox is to realastic!!!!!! |
|
Jazman111Join Date: 2008-12-28
Post Count: 4300 |
NO.
Theres this thing called PANTS, use them to make shoes... |
|
|
no no never I hate this idea! blagh worse then eating rotten cabbage! |
|
jamjam195Join Date: 2009-04-18
Post Count: 322 |
i say yes/no becuase we are robloxains and made of plastic and the mesh for the shoes would be too laggy like some hats are. and yes becuase i like the idea becuase i like some shirts/pants but i dont like the shoe parts at the bottom =) |
|
RioluAuraJoin Date: 2008-11-09
Post Count: 483 |
I agree just because of the Jet Boots. |
|
|
No no shoes some can cause lag like jet shoes |
|
hihihibobJoin Date: 2009-06-07
Post Count: 2862 |
we dont have feet, how can we wear shoes... |
|
ManticlawJoin Date: 2009-12-18
Post Count: 89 |
No bad idea think again |
|
FoxOn36Join Date: 2008-09-18
Post Count: 5798 |
1.It wouldn't look right
2. mesh overload
3. footsplosion like the current hatsplosion
4. Possible lag
5. Could cause glitches
6. Could get stuck in objects
7. creates easier targets
8. Can just be put on pants
9. Cheating in obbies
10. Can ruin current games
11. We are BLOCKS, NOT Humans
12. Waste of website space
13. Pointless
14. Boost in brickbattles etc.
15. I say again it wouldn't look right
16. Can easily glitch games
17. Having a key to take them off could cause problems for scripts that already include that key.
18. Could cause another trippy glitch
19. Waste of precious ROBUX
20. Ladder Glitches
21. Could make the falling glitch more common
|
|
|
Acctuly the shoes CAN be blocks just a simple long thin block. Simple! i support!
~=Chandler=~ |
|
megapowerJoin Date: 2008-12-03
Post Count: 5324 |
WE are blocks. Not hummans |
|
|
but the blocks dont collide and they wouldnt have to be for sale!
~=Chandler=~ |
|
|
ARE U BLIND?!?! I SAID IF THE SHOES WERE NOT SET TO COLLIDE,AND WAS JUST THIN LITTLE BLOCKS IT WOULDNT CAUSE AND PROBLEM AND + WE WOULD STILL BE BLOCKS!!
~=Chandler=~ |
|
FoxOn36Join Date: 2008-09-18
Post Count: 5798 |
They would be used to cheat if they cant collide -.-
Even then, try getting around all of the problems I pointed out. |
|
|
FoxOn36Join Date: 2008-09-18
Post Count: 5798 |
Pmub. Horrible idea. |
|
|
Fox, I predict you are blind. DONT COLLIDE MEANS ITS LIKE INVISIBLE. EXEPT ITS VISIBLE AND YOU CAN WALK THROUGH IT! GET THE POINT!?!? |
|
|
Current size will increase by size 0.3. And if the CanCollide is equivalent to the value false it would be nil. |
|
|
I agree because of tennis shoes (and some others but mainly tennis). |
|