|
I think the cap should be 120 as it would not be too fast. |
|
|
No support.
400 would be better--wait, is 400 FPS a thing? |
|
|
|
Do people even like motion blur?
Don't hate on something just because it's new. |
|
|
Why not raise it to unlimited? For god sakes they are making 200 HZ Monitors now!
|
|
|
For you idiots saying "60 FPS is fine" when people first started asking for 60 everybody said "30 FPS is fine" and now look where we are. If you say you have a monitor set to 144hz and you have a decent PC, and you still claim you can't see a difference:
1.) You're lying.
2.) You are visually impaired in some way.
3.) Your monitor isn't adjusted correctly.
4.) You don't have a 144hz monitor.
Yes, 60 FPS is good, but 144 FPS is better. Why would you have good if you could have better?
Don't hate on something just because it's new. |
|
|
"it's absolutely fine at 60"
Until one teeny update happens then it drops a few frames for a couple hundred milliseconds. I paid for my hardware I should be able to use it to its full extent. |
|
waffle502Join Date: 2011-05-25 Post Count: 12155 |
bump |
|
freya02Join Date: 2013-12-04 Post Count: 272 |
Noobs, it's just USELESS to get higher fps than 60 fps, our eyes can't have more than 60 FPS.
No support, that's USELESS.
|
|
waffle502Join Date: 2011-05-25 Post Count: 12155 |
@freya you obviously have never seen frames higher than 60 fps on a 144hz monitor because thts not true and ##### ## ###### |
|
MrEWhiteJoin Date: 2010-11-23 Post Count: 4340 |
Then how come 144 Hz monitors are so much better smoothness wise than 60 Hz? |
|
Noctis28Join Date: 2014-10-24 Post Count: 89 |
support
|
|
TheHybJoin Date: 2012-08-09 Post Count: 1636 |
Why hello cyco |
|
MrEWhiteJoin Date: 2010-11-23 Post Count: 4340 |
b |
|
|
Support. I have been lagging out on a game, and I cannot even play a single game for longer. And I do not have a computer that have more than 60 FPS, that would make my experience lower. Please add this.
sincerely, roblox soldier (RAP: 7) |
|
|
but getting to 144 fps means that you'd need a better computer, OR getting the people at roblox HQ to fix performance issues. besides, roblox is 32 bit, which means it cannot use more then 4GB ram and one core in your processor, so it would be difficult...
#code print("overused memes arent overused") |
|
|
60 frames per second LOL GET OUTTA HERE. 300 frame per second pls
https://www.roblox.com/games/569861696/FacePalm |
|
MrEWhiteJoin Date: 2010-11-23 Post Count: 4340 |
>roblox is 32 bit, which means it cannot use more then 4GB ram and one core in your processor, so it would be difficult... Oh my god ###### ## ##### |
|
|
"Not everybody has a high end computer with nividia GTX 1080 graphics and 200GB RAM and 144Hz monitor"
Who the hell cares? It's as if they'd be preventing anyone who doesn't have high specs to be playing Roblox, they'd just be providing a better experience for those who do. What even is your point? |
|
|
Support, Too bad if you have a bad pc. Buy a new one
https://www.roblox.com/games/569861696/FacePalm |
|
|
|
is it bad that I have a gtx 1080 and a 144 hz monitor |
|
|
as a developer i say this is good suggestion but i also say its not good one...
1. if you want to use you powerful pc play othergames that need more power(roblox was made for everyone and should stay that way(roblox takes less power so people with slow pcs could play)).
2.it wouldnt be fair advantage and besides roblox has v-sync so there arent no texture pop ups in close range.
3.60fps is completely fine its smooth and better then 30fps...and the more fps the harder you see a difference like from 95fps you can hardly see a difference with 130fps.
4.it would remove roblox optimization and expect frame drops in middle of a game.
and many more things you need to consider before you make suggestion like this. |
|
DR2D2Join Date: 2012-01-10 Post Count: 2592 |
support
insert signature here |
|
SynfluxJoin Date: 2016-10-26 Post Count: 195 |
It's ROBLOX for crying out loud. We don't need this.
No support. |
|