TheseAreMySocks
#192659336Sunday, July 03, 2016 2:36 AM GMT

I think the cap should be 120 as it would not be too fast.
PenguinvilleRescue1
#192660700Sunday, July 03, 2016 2:52 AM GMT

No support. 400 would be better--wait, is 400 FPS a thing?
robloxmadeamistake
#192662378Sunday, July 03, 2016 3:16 AM GMT

1k fps cap pls /s
CrunchyToaster
#194525205Monday, July 25, 2016 5:24 PM GMT

Do people even like motion blur? Don't hate on something just because it's new.
IntelEyeSeven7700K
#194526804Monday, July 25, 2016 5:47 PM GMT

Why not raise it to unlimited? For god sakes they are making 200 HZ Monitors now!
CrunchyToaster
#194551938Monday, July 25, 2016 11:17 PM GMT

For you idiots saying "60 FPS is fine" when people first started asking for 60 everybody said "30 FPS is fine" and now look where we are. If you say you have a monitor set to 144hz and you have a decent PC, and you still claim you can't see a difference: 1.) You're lying. 2.) You are visually impaired in some way. 3.) Your monitor isn't adjusted correctly. 4.) You don't have a 144hz monitor. Yes, 60 FPS is good, but 144 FPS is better. Why would you have good if you could have better? Don't hate on something just because it's new.
f00fc7c8_fox
#194553543Monday, July 25, 2016 11:37 PM GMT

"it's absolutely fine at 60" Until one teeny update happens then it drops a few frames for a couple hundred milliseconds. I paid for my hardware I should be able to use it to its full extent.
waffle502
#200706326Sunday, October 30, 2016 8:46 AM GMT

bump
freya02
#200707938Sunday, October 30, 2016 10:43 AM GMT

Noobs, it's just USELESS to get higher fps than 60 fps, our eyes can't have more than 60 FPS. No support, that's USELESS.
waffle502
#200722933Sunday, October 30, 2016 6:49 PM GMT

@freya you obviously have never seen frames higher than 60 fps on a 144hz monitor because thts not true and ##### ## ######
MrEWhite
#200807209Wednesday, November 02, 2016 1:13 AM GMT

Then how come 144 Hz monitors are so much better smoothness wise than 60 Hz?
Noctis28
#200818737Wednesday, November 02, 2016 10:37 AM GMT

support
TheHyb
#203511538Sunday, December 04, 2016 5:52 PM GMT

Why hello cyco
MrEWhite
#204557309Saturday, December 17, 2016 4:57 AM GMT

b
therobloxsoldier084
#204557994Saturday, December 17, 2016 5:13 AM GMT

Support. I have been lagging out on a game, and I cannot even play a single game for longer. And I do not have a computer that have more than 60 FPS, that would make my experience lower. Please add this. sincerely, roblox soldier (RAP: 7)
dullsword4
#204571483Saturday, December 17, 2016 11:52 AM GMT

but getting to 144 fps means that you'd need a better computer, OR getting the people at roblox HQ to fix performance issues. besides, roblox is 32 bit, which means it cannot use more then 4GB ram and one core in your processor, so it would be difficult... #code print("overused memes arent overused")
SwordFighter9122
#204571870Saturday, December 17, 2016 12:09 PM GMT

60 frames per second LOL GET OUTTA HERE. 300 frame per second pls https://www.roblox.com/games/569861696/FacePalm
MrEWhite
#204641478Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:30 AM GMT

>roblox is 32 bit, which means it cannot use more then 4GB ram and one core in your processor, so it would be difficult... Oh my god ###### ## #####
SirCaptainBaconhair
#204642364Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:41 AM GMT

"Not everybody has a high end computer with nividia GTX 1080 graphics and 200GB RAM and 144Hz monitor" Who the hell cares? It's as if they'd be preventing anyone who doesn't have high specs to be playing Roblox, they'd just be providing a better experience for those who do. What even is your point?
SwordFighter9122
#204643972Sunday, December 18, 2016 5:01 AM GMT

Support, Too bad if you have a bad pc. Buy a new one https://www.roblox.com/games/569861696/FacePalm
SirCaptainBaconhair
#204646062Sunday, December 18, 2016 5:29 AM GMT

*It's not as if
CxnderAndButter
#219476314Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:04 PM GMT

is it bad that I have a gtx 1080 and a 144 hz monitor
misthero21
#219477022Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:15 PM GMT

as a developer i say this is good suggestion but i also say its not good one... 1. if you want to use you powerful pc play othergames that need more power(roblox was made for everyone and should stay that way(roblox takes less power so people with slow pcs could play)). 2.it wouldnt be fair advantage and besides roblox has v-sync so there arent no texture pop ups in close range. 3.60fps is completely fine its smooth and better then 30fps...and the more fps the harder you see a difference like from 95fps you can hardly see a difference with 130fps. 4.it would remove roblox optimization and expect frame drops in middle of a game. and many more things you need to consider before you make suggestion like this.
DR2D2
#219480626Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:11 PM GMT

support insert signature here
Synflux
#219480708Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:12 PM GMT

It's ROBLOX for crying out loud. We don't need this. No support.