|
#1 Interpretation of C.VII.VII
Requested By: CaptinDix
His reasoning: Due to some controversy of C.VII.VII stating Rockport shall have no power over TRC and vice-versa, some say that means people on the TRC team are not required to follow Rockport laws, and Rockport not needing to obey TRC as they have no power over each other. Meanwhile others state that the amendment is only pointing towards the groups, and not the teams within the cities. I am requesting to the Supreme Court to interpret the amendment on weather or not it is meaning the groups have no power over each other, or the teams have no power over each other.
C.VII.VII For reference:
Article VII: Rockport shall have no power over TRC except whereas elsewhere defined in this Constitution, and TRC shall have no power in Rockport except whereas elsewhere defined in this Constitution.
Supreme Court Verdict: Passes 3-1-0 (aye abstain nay) - Meaning the groups do in fact have no power over the other except how it is stated in C.VII.VII
________________________________________________________________________________________
#2 Judicial Review of Senator iiKateeee
Requested by Representative Frank
Charge: Breaking Rockport Constitution ( Breaking C.VIII.V )
Evidence: On RJB trello because roblox doesnt allow this site
Forum: http://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=187565803 (Article V)
Supreme Court Verdict: Fails 0-1-3 (Aye abstain nay)
________________________________________________________________________________________
#3 Judicial Review of CoS JonathanTheMuffin
Requested by: bill52600
The charges associated with this JR are as follows:
- 1 count of failing to yield to an emergency vehicle attempting to pull you [JonathanTheMuffin] over
- 2 counts of failing to stop at a stop sign
- 1 count of failing to stop when a law enforcement officer has stopped you [JonathanTheMuffin]
The evidence associated with this JR is as follows:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jSJrbtYVeY
The laws and statutes enforced with this JR can be found here:
http://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=158016164
Supreme Court Verdict: Passes 1-3-0 (aye abstain nay)
________________________________________________________________________________________
#4 Interpretation of C.II.XI
Article XI: In the event of a tie, the Presiding Officer must break it. Abstains count as fail votes. Voting format is read as “AYES-NAYS-ABSTAINS”. Majorities should be rounded down if the tenths place is below 5 and up if it is above 5.
-Aye means this applies to all branches
-Nay means this applies to just the legislative branch due to it only being found in the legislative amendment. (Abstain counts as a No Vote)
Supreme Court Verdict: 1-0-3 (Aye-Abstain-Nay)
Let it be known that C.II.XI only applies to the legislative branch, and in the supreme court abstains are used as no votes. (not fail [nay] votes)
________________________________________________________________________________________
Have a concern about what a law or the constitution means? Feel free to pm me or another SCJ for an answer!
-Signed, Blastatack CCJ
: 13,922 |