5ancuJoin Date: 2015-12-31
Post Count: 6771 |
Also, Idk why RAT is even on there, Poly gives himself additional health at his fort, RAT's guns do +2 damage at Sierra.
The newest thing they've done is bringing back Celeste 2, and letting FoL carry them (like every other clan that is considered skillful does nowadays). |
|
5ancuJoin Date: 2015-12-31
Post Count: 6771 |
Also, the fact that you've placed UAF below TRA kinda offends me. We did beat them 50-0 a year ago with activity similar to the current we have. |
|
|
|
2 years ago and it was 50-1 smh
|
|
|
Sancu, they're the ELITE DIVISION, they're SUPPOSED to carry, it's their job.
|
|
5ancuJoin Date: 2015-12-31
Post Count: 6771 |
"Sancu, they're the ELITE DIVISION, they're SUPPOSED to carry, it's their job."
Do you believe that your elite division advantages at your forts emphasize on FoL members being 'elite', or take away from defining them as such?
@Obtention,
fair point, but does VAK cowering against UAF about a year ago not count either, then? The clan you've placed as #1/2? |
|
|
|
5ancuJoin Date: 2015-12-31
Post Count: 6771 |
@Obtention,
regarding the UAF vs. VAK war?
VAK agreed to a set of war terms that would allow UAF to declare victory if they didn't have a base released by a certain date. They didn't, and UAF, because we actually wanted the war, and were very willing to compromise, postponed that date two or three days. VAK still didn't have their fort ready with the...ermhmm..."necessary" updates.
Theoretically, UAF could've taken the victory there and then, but didn't. Why? Because we were willing to compromise, whereas VAK was only willing to propose ultimatums, the general tone from VAK was, "do this or no war".
I've described the negotiations and the war that never occurred in the following image.
prntscr/7zgihq
Yes, I literally kept that because I had to tell so many idiots on the forums how wrong VAK is on several occasions - that's when you know it's bad.
@RAT guy, possibly FoL,
I'm not butthurt, I'm making a very decent argument. If you're elite, why do you need unnecessary advantages? But seeing as you can't argue against it, that is very likely why you're calling me butthurt. Truth hurts. |
|
|
i mean you guys didnt even show up to negotiations after declaring war so i assume that's the reason you're attacking rat here, because you know you can't back it up and that you don't have to
|
|
|
rat hosts over 200 bps in like a week idk how anyone is more active than us
|
|
5ancuJoin Date: 2015-12-31
Post Count: 6771 |
"you guys didnt even show up to negotiations after declaring war"
1) RAT declared war, not UAF
2) RAT was discovered to have +2 damage at Sierra, thus cheating
3) Poly gave himself and the rest of the RAT team extra health because he got mad once - he cheats
4) When a clan declares war, you expect them to be willing to compromise, right? Well, not RAT!
5) UAF wanted the admiral pistols removed, but RAT had something against that, even though they insisted they would never be used against UAF (they were)
6): RAT sucks bowls |
|
5ancuJoin Date: 2015-12-31
Post Count: 6771 |
7) RAT discontinued negotiations
8) RAT had, God knows how many people partaking in their negotiations, UAF had False. Imagine having to negotiate in a state like that |
|
InsurrectJoin Date: 2013-10-04
Post Count: 22734 |
lolddd |
|
|
1) RAT declared war, not UAF
2) RAT was discovered to have +2 damage at Sierra, thus cheating
3) Poly gave himself and the rest of the RAT team extra health because he got mad once - he cheats
4) When a clan declares war, you expect them to be willing to compromise, right? Well, not RAT!
5) UAF wanted the admiral pistols removed, but RAT had something against that, even though they insisted they would never be used against UAF (they were)
7) RAT discontinued negotiations
8) RAT had, God knows how many people partaking in their negotiations, UAF had False. Imagine having to negotiate in a state like that
--
UAF declared war. Not RAT.
RAT removed that immediately afterwards, but it still didn't prevent clans from getting wins, so I don't see why you find this so troubling.
Poly has never given the RAT team extra health, only raiders as a joke because they are doing terribly
RAT did compromise. UAF didn't. UAF actually made updates to their base making it ridiculously unfair just to spite RAT, which was hilarious considering we still won countless raids.
I'll admit, SPFlights is just plain stupid.
Falsewarrior discontinued negotiations, not RAT. I say this because False scheduled several meetings for war and didn't turn up to any of them, we clearly weren't getting a war so we discontinued war negotiations.
RAT had Shine, Moolego and Damien. You had False and Moolego.
In conclusion, stop trying to argue things you >CLEARLY< don't know anything about.
|
|
|
I remember once Moojl was in game and they literally ignored any efforts anyone made to call them into negotiations
|
|
scheil3eJoin Date: 2016-05-20
Post Count: 438 |
"UAF declared war. Not RAT."
I'll just ignore the rest of what you said because it has no substance to it or isn't true. What I quoted isn't true either, RAT declared war, not UAF.
UAF updated the base to show RAT how much bs the SPFlights are, yet RAT continues to exist on having them there to this day. Quite hypocritical, I would say. |
|
|
Not sure why Yugi/Harb are bashing on FC when FC has the most recent (and successful) war out of the >entire clan world<
Not to mention the fact that the FC/RAA conflict is fairly recent in terms of the stagnant clan world. |
|
|
"RAT removed that immediately afterwards, but it still didn't prevent clans from getting wins, so I don't see why you find this so troubling."
Oh so just because clans could still win at your unfair fort means that CHEATING was okay to do for well over a year?
Yeah nice, thanks for pointing out what's wrong with clans these days. |
|
|
Anyone wanna send me a giant list of prevalent clans?
I'd be glad to sift through them
|
|
galbotrixJoin Date: 2008-12-19
Post Count: 1330 |
I think you're blabbing too much about it being successful, it was nothing more than a war against a 100x weaker clan. FC would be better if you looked to improving yourself instead of boasting about a war being "successful".
Oi, is that a biscuit? |
|
|
"I think you're blabbing too much about it being successful, it was nothing more than a war against a 100x weaker clan. FC would be better if you looked to improving yourself instead of boasting about a war being "successful"."
Oh I'm sorry, I guess clans declaring war and the wars never taking place or wars start and then end due to underhanded tactics means those clans that engage in such wars are better than those that fight honorably!
Additionally, just because we fought a weaker clan (A clan that actually declared war on us) doesn't disregard the war's success at all. It was a war with a very limited amount of flaming, successful cooperation, and was actually >completed<.
Whether it was a weaker opponent or not, it was a war that actually stuck to morals and values, a war similar to what we would have seen 4 years ago, but not now. |
|
galbotrixJoin Date: 2008-12-19
Post Count: 1330 |
You're extremely arrogant to think that just because you won a war you instantly are better than most clans, that's my point. This is what brings our community to a frowning because people try to prove themselves with something that totally doesn't relate to their argument and makes them look arrogant.
I like FC don't get me wrong, but if you're going to make your point off a war with a clan that has always played fair in every war they've had under this leader's ownership then you're claiming you've won a war fairly like everyone else has. Not much of an accomplishment.
Oi, is that a biscuit? |
|
2kmoreJoin Date: 2009-04-25
Post Count: 26218 |
"I'm still waiting for Poly to get back to me on the UAF-RAT thingy. Nearly two months." - Falsewarrior
|
|
|
We tried contacting him and he didn't reply 2k.
|
|